Gov. Gavin Newsom signs new gun legislation in California
Articles,  Blog

Gov. Gavin Newsom signs new gun legislation in California


GUN GUN SAFETY GUN SAFETY AND GUN SAFETY AND GUNS GUN SAFETY AND GUNS IN GUN SAFETY AND GUNS IN
CALIFORNIA GUN SAFETY AND GUNS IN
CALIFORNIA IS GUN SAFETY AND GUNS IN
CALIFORNIA IS THE GUN SAFETY AND GUNS IN
CALIFORNIA IS THE HOT GUN SAFETY AND GUNS IN
CALIFORNIA IS THE HOT TOPIC. GUN SAFETY AND GUNS IN
CALIFORNIA IS THE HOT TOPIC.
THAT GUN SAFETY AND GUNS IN
CALIFORNIA IS THE HOT TOPIC.
THAT BRINGS GUN SAFETY AND GUNS IN
CALIFORNIA IS THE HOT TOPIC.
THAT BRINGS US GUN SAFETY AND GUNS IN
CALIFORNIA IS THE HOT TOPIC.
THAT BRINGS US TO GUN SAFETY AND GUNS IN
CALIFORNIA IS THE HOT TOPIC.
THAT BRINGS US TO OUR GUN SAFETY AND GUNS IN
CALIFORNIA IS THE HOT TOPIC.
THAT BRINGS US TO OUR QUESTION CALIFORNIA IS THE HOT TOPIC.
THAT BRINGS US TO OUR QUESTION CALIFORNIA IS THE HOT TOPIC.
THAT BRINGS US TO OUR QUESTION
OF CALIFORNIA IS THE HOT TOPIC.
THAT BRINGS US TO OUR QUESTION
OF THE CALIFORNIA IS THE HOT TOPIC.
THAT BRINGS US TO OUR QUESTION
OF THE DAY. THAT BRINGS US TO OUR QUESTION
OF THE DAY. THAT BRINGS US TO OUR QUESTION
OF THE DAY.
GOVERNOR THAT BRINGS US TO OUR QUESTION
OF THE DAY.
GOVERNOR NEWSOM THAT BRINGS US TO OUR QUESTION
OF THE DAY.
GOVERNOR NEWSOM HAS THAT BRINGS US TO OUR QUESTION
OF THE DAY.
GOVERNOR NEWSOM HAS THE THAT BRINGS US TO OUR QUESTION
OF THE DAY.
GOVERNOR NEWSOM HAS THE OPTION OF THE DAY.
GOVERNOR NEWSOM HAS THE OPTION OF THE DAY.
GOVERNOR NEWSOM HAS THE OPTION
TO OF THE DAY.
GOVERNOR NEWSOM HAS THE OPTION
TO SIGN, OF THE DAY.
GOVERNOR NEWSOM HAS THE OPTION
TO SIGN, VETO OF THE DAY.
GOVERNOR NEWSOM HAS THE OPTION
TO SIGN, VETO OR OF THE DAY.
GOVERNOR NEWSOM HAS THE OPTION
TO SIGN, VETO OR IGNORE OF THE DAY.
GOVERNOR NEWSOM HAS THE OPTION
TO SIGN, VETO OR IGNORE 250 OF THE DAY.
GOVERNOR NEWSOM HAS THE OPTION
TO SIGN, VETO OR IGNORE 250 NEW GOVERNOR NEWSOM HAS THE OPTION
TO SIGN, VETO OR IGNORE 250 NEW GOVERNOR NEWSOM HAS THE OPTION
TO SIGN, VETO OR IGNORE 250 NEW
BILLS GOVERNOR NEWSOM HAS THE OPTION
TO SIGN, VETO OR IGNORE 250 NEW
BILLS AND GOVERNOR NEWSOM HAS THE OPTION
TO SIGN, VETO OR IGNORE 250 NEW
BILLS AND IN GOVERNOR NEWSOM HAS THE OPTION
TO SIGN, VETO OR IGNORE 250 NEW
BILLS AND IN THAT GOVERNOR NEWSOM HAS THE OPTION
TO SIGN, VETO OR IGNORE 250 NEW
BILLS AND IN THAT NEW GOVERNOR NEWSOM HAS THE OPTION
TO SIGN, VETO OR IGNORE 250 NEW
BILLS AND IN THAT NEW BILL, TO SIGN, VETO OR IGNORE 250 NEW
BILLS AND IN THAT NEW BILL, TO SIGN, VETO OR IGNORE 250 NEW
BILLS AND IN THAT NEW BILL,
SOME TO SIGN, VETO OR IGNORE 250 NEW
BILLS AND IN THAT NEW BILL,
SOME OF TO SIGN, VETO OR IGNORE 250 NEW
BILLS AND IN THAT NEW BILL,
SOME OF THE TO SIGN, VETO OR IGNORE 250 NEW
BILLS AND IN THAT NEW BILL,
SOME OF THE THINGS TO SIGN, VETO OR IGNORE 250 NEW
BILLS AND IN THAT NEW BILL,
SOME OF THE THINGS HE TO SIGN, VETO OR IGNORE 250 NEW
BILLS AND IN THAT NEW BILL,
SOME OF THE THINGS HE WILL TO SIGN, VETO OR IGNORE 250 NEW
BILLS AND IN THAT NEW BILL,
SOME OF THE THINGS HE WILL BE BILLS AND IN THAT NEW BILL,
SOME OF THE THINGS HE WILL BE BILLS AND IN THAT NEW BILL,
SOME OF THE THINGS HE WILL BE
ADDRESSING BILLS AND IN THAT NEW BILL,
SOME OF THE THINGS HE WILL BE
ADDRESSING IS BILLS AND IN THAT NEW BILL,
SOME OF THE THINGS HE WILL BE
ADDRESSING IS A BILLS AND IN THAT NEW BILL,
SOME OF THE THINGS HE WILL BE
ADDRESSING IS A SERIES BILLS AND IN THAT NEW BILL,
SOME OF THE THINGS HE WILL BE
ADDRESSING IS A SERIES OF BILLS AND IN THAT NEW BILL,
SOME OF THE THINGS HE WILL BE
ADDRESSING IS A SERIES OF BILLS SOME OF THE THINGS HE WILL BE
ADDRESSING IS A SERIES OF BILLS SOME OF THE THINGS HE WILL BE
ADDRESSING IS A SERIES OF BILLS
AIMED SOME OF THE THINGS HE WILL BE
ADDRESSING IS A SERIES OF BILLS
AIMED AT SOME OF THE THINGS HE WILL BE
ADDRESSING IS A SERIES OF BILLS
AIMED AT PREVENTING SOME OF THE THINGS HE WILL BE
ADDRESSING IS A SERIES OF BILLS
AIMED AT PREVENTING GUN SOME OF THE THINGS HE WILL BE
ADDRESSING IS A SERIES OF BILLS
AIMED AT PREVENTING GUN VIOLENCE ADDRESSING IS A SERIES OF BILLS
AIMED AT PREVENTING GUN VIOLENCE ADDRESSING IS A SERIES OF BILLS
AIMED AT PREVENTING GUN VIOLENCE
. ADDRESSING IS A SERIES OF BILLS
AIMED AT PREVENTING GUN VIOLENCE
. SHOULD ADDRESSING IS A SERIES OF BILLS
AIMED AT PREVENTING GUN VIOLENCE
. SHOULD THE ADDRESSING IS A SERIES OF BILLS
AIMED AT PREVENTING GUN VIOLENCE
. SHOULD THE AGE ADDRESSING IS A SERIES OF BILLS
AIMED AT PREVENTING GUN VIOLENCE
. SHOULD THE AGE BE ADDRESSING IS A SERIES OF BILLS
AIMED AT PREVENTING GUN VIOLENCE
. SHOULD THE AGE BE RAISED ADDRESSING IS A SERIES OF BILLS
AIMED AT PREVENTING GUN VIOLENCE
. SHOULD THE AGE BE RAISED TO AIMED AT PREVENTING GUN VIOLENCE
. SHOULD THE AGE BE RAISED TO AIMED AT PREVENTING GUN VIOLENCE
. SHOULD THE AGE BE RAISED TO
21 AIMED AT PREVENTING GUN VIOLENCE
. SHOULD THE AGE BE RAISED TO
21 TO AIMED AT PREVENTING GUN VIOLENCE
. SHOULD THE AGE BE RAISED TO
21 TO PURCHASE AIMED AT PREVENTING GUN VIOLENCE
. SHOULD THE AGE BE RAISED TO
21 TO PURCHASE A AIMED AT PREVENTING GUN VIOLENCE
. SHOULD THE AGE BE RAISED TO
21 TO PURCHASE A GUN AIMED AT PREVENTING GUN VIOLENCE
. SHOULD THE AGE BE RAISED TO
21 TO PURCHASE A GUN WITH AIMED AT PREVENTING GUN VIOLENCE
. SHOULD THE AGE BE RAISED TO
21 TO PURCHASE A GUN WITH NO . SHOULD THE AGE BE RAISED TO
21 TO PURCHASE A GUN WITH NO . SHOULD THE AGE BE RAISED TO
21 TO PURCHASE A GUN WITH NO
EXCEPTIONS? 21 TO PURCHASE A GUN WITH NO
EXCEPTIONS? 21 TO PURCHASE A GUN WITH NO
EXCEPTIONS?
JOE 21 TO PURCHASE A GUN WITH NO
EXCEPTIONS?
JOE WROTE 21 TO PURCHASE A GUN WITH NO
EXCEPTIONS?
JOE WROTE BACK 21 TO PURCHASE A GUN WITH NO
EXCEPTIONS?
JOE WROTE BACK AND 21 TO PURCHASE A GUN WITH NO
EXCEPTIONS?
JOE WROTE BACK AND SAID EXCEPTIONS?
JOE WROTE BACK AND SAID EXCEPTIONS?
JOE WROTE BACK AND SAID
POSSIBLY, EXCEPTIONS?
JOE WROTE BACK AND SAID
POSSIBLY, BUT EXCEPTIONS?
JOE WROTE BACK AND SAID
POSSIBLY, BUT HOW EXCEPTIONS?
JOE WROTE BACK AND SAID
POSSIBLY, BUT HOW WOULD EXCEPTIONS?
JOE WROTE BACK AND SAID
POSSIBLY, BUT HOW WOULD LAW JOE WROTE BACK AND SAID
POSSIBLY, BUT HOW WOULD LAW JOE WROTE BACK AND SAID
POSSIBLY, BUT HOW WOULD LAW
ENFORCEMENT JOE WROTE BACK AND SAID
POSSIBLY, BUT HOW WOULD LAW
ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES JOE WROTE BACK AND SAID
POSSIBLY, BUT HOW WOULD LAW
ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES HANDLE POSSIBLY, BUT HOW WOULD LAW
ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES HANDLE POSSIBLY, BUT HOW WOULD LAW
ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES HANDLE
THIS? ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES HANDLE
THIS? ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES HANDLE
THIS?
WOULD ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES HANDLE
THIS?
WOULD ALL ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES HANDLE
THIS?
WOULD ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES HANDLE
THIS?
WOULD ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES HANDLE
THIS?
WOULD ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT HAVE THIS?
WOULD ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT HAVE THIS?
WOULD ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT HAVE
TO THIS?
WOULD ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT HAVE
TO BE THIS?
WOULD ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT HAVE
TO BE 21 THIS?
WOULD ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT HAVE
TO BE 21 TO THIS?
WOULD ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT HAVE
TO BE 21 TO BE THIS?
WOULD ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT HAVE
TO BE 21 TO BE AN THIS?
WOULD ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT HAVE
TO BE 21 TO BE AN OFFICER? WOULD ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT HAVE
TO BE 21 TO BE AN OFFICER? WOULD ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT HAVE
TO BE 21 TO BE AN OFFICER?
>>WOULD ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT HAVE
TO BE 21 TO BE AN OFFICER?
>>INTERESTING. TO BE 21 TO BE AN OFFICER?
>>INTERESTING. TO BE 21 TO BE AN OFFICER?
>>INTERESTING.
RIGHT TO BE 21 TO BE AN OFFICER?
>>INTERESTING.
RIGHT NOW, TO BE 21 TO BE AN OFFICER?
>>INTERESTING.
RIGHT NOW, 67% TO BE 21 TO BE AN OFFICER?
>>INTERESTING.
RIGHT NOW, 67% OF TO BE 21 TO BE AN OFFICER?
>>INTERESTING.
RIGHT NOW, 67% OF YOU TO BE 21 TO BE AN OFFICER?
>>INTERESTING.
RIGHT NOW, 67% OF YOU ARE>>INTERESTING.
RIGHT NOW, 67% OF YOU ARE>>INTERESTING.
RIGHT NOW, 67% OF YOU ARE
SAYING>>INTERESTING.
RIGHT NOW, 67% OF YOU ARE
SAYING NO.>>INTERESTING.
RIGHT NOW, 67% OF YOU ARE
SAYING NO. THE>>INTERESTING.
RIGHT NOW, 67% OF YOU ARE
SAYING NO. THE LEGISLATION>>INTERESTING.
RIGHT NOW, 67% OF YOU ARE
SAYING NO. THE LEGISLATION WAS RIGHT NOW, 67% OF YOU ARE
SAYING NO. THE LEGISLATION WAS RIGHT NOW, 67% OF YOU ARE
SAYING NO. THE LEGISLATION WAS
BILLED RIGHT NOW, 67% OF YOU ARE
SAYING NO. THE LEGISLATION WAS
BILLED ON RIGHT NOW, 67% OF YOU ARE
SAYING NO. THE LEGISLATION WAS
BILLED ON INVESTMENTS RIGHT NOW, 67% OF YOU ARE
SAYING NO. THE LEGISLATION WAS
BILLED ON INVESTMENTS MADE RIGHT NOW, 67% OF YOU ARE
SAYING NO. THE LEGISLATION WAS
BILLED ON INVESTMENTS MADE IN SAYING NO. THE LEGISLATION WAS
BILLED ON INVESTMENTS MADE IN SAYING NO. THE LEGISLATION WAS
BILLED ON INVESTMENTS MADE IN
THE SAYING NO. THE LEGISLATION WAS
BILLED ON INVESTMENTS MADE IN
THE 2019/2020 SAYING NO. THE LEGISLATION WAS
BILLED ON INVESTMENTS MADE IN
THE 2019/2020 STATE SAYING NO. THE LEGISLATION WAS
BILLED ON INVESTMENTS MADE IN
THE 2019/2020 STATE BUDGET. BILLED ON INVESTMENTS MADE IN
THE 2019/2020 STATE BUDGET. BILLED ON INVESTMENTS MADE IN
THE 2019/2020 STATE BUDGET.
WE BILLED ON INVESTMENTS MADE IN
THE 2019/2020 STATE BUDGET.
WE COMBED BILLED ON INVESTMENTS MADE IN
THE 2019/2020 STATE BUDGET.
WE COMBED THROUGH BILLED ON INVESTMENTS MADE IN
THE 2019/2020 STATE BUDGET.
WE COMBED THROUGH SOME BILLED ON INVESTMENTS MADE IN
THE 2019/2020 STATE BUDGET.
WE COMBED THROUGH SOME OF BILLED ON INVESTMENTS MADE IN
THE 2019/2020 STATE BUDGET.
WE COMBED THROUGH SOME OF THOSE THE 2019/2020 STATE BUDGET.
WE COMBED THROUGH SOME OF THOSE THE 2019/2020 STATE BUDGET.
WE COMBED THROUGH SOME OF THOSE
BILLS. WE COMBED THROUGH SOME OF THOSE
BILLS. WE COMBED THROUGH SOME OF THOSE
BILLS.
ONE WE COMBED THROUGH SOME OF THOSE
BILLS.
ONE OF WE COMBED THROUGH SOME OF THOSE
BILLS.
ONE OF THEM WE COMBED THROUGH SOME OF THOSE
BILLS.
ONE OF THEM IS WE COMBED THROUGH SOME OF THOSE
BILLS.
ONE OF THEM IS BILL WE COMBED THROUGH SOME OF THOSE
BILLS.
ONE OF THEM IS BILL NUMBER WE COMBED THROUGH SOME OF THOSE
BILLS.
ONE OF THEM IS BILL NUMBER 61, BILLS.
ONE OF THEM IS BILL NUMBER 61, BILLS.
ONE OF THEM IS BILL NUMBER 61,
THE BILLS.
ONE OF THEM IS BILL NUMBER 61,
THE ACQUISITION BILLS.
ONE OF THEM IS BILL NUMBER 61,
THE ACQUISITION OF BILLS.
ONE OF THEM IS BILL NUMBER 61,
THE ACQUISITION OF FIREARMS ONE OF THEM IS BILL NUMBER 61,
THE ACQUISITION OF FIREARMS ONE OF THEM IS BILL NUMBER 61,
THE ACQUISITION OF FIREARMS
UNDER ONE OF THEM IS BILL NUMBER 61,
THE ACQUISITION OF FIREARMS
UNDER 21 ONE OF THEM IS BILL NUMBER 61,
THE ACQUISITION OF FIREARMS
UNDER 21 YEARS ONE OF THEM IS BILL NUMBER 61,
THE ACQUISITION OF FIREARMS
UNDER 21 YEARS OF ONE OF THEM IS BILL NUMBER 61,
THE ACQUISITION OF FIREARMS
UNDER 21 YEARS OF AGE ONE OF THEM IS BILL NUMBER 61,
THE ACQUISITION OF FIREARMS
UNDER 21 YEARS OF AGE BY THE ACQUISITION OF FIREARMS
UNDER 21 YEARS OF AGE BY THE ACQUISITION OF FIREARMS
UNDER 21 YEARS OF AGE BY
ELIMINATING THE ACQUISITION OF FIREARMS
UNDER 21 YEARS OF AGE BY
ELIMINATING THE THE ACQUISITION OF FIREARMS
UNDER 21 YEARS OF AGE BY
ELIMINATING THE EXISTING UNDER 21 YEARS OF AGE BY
ELIMINATING THE EXISTING UNDER 21 YEARS OF AGE BY
ELIMINATING THE EXISTING
EXCEPTION UNDER 21 YEARS OF AGE BY
ELIMINATING THE EXISTING
EXCEPTION FOR UNDER 21 YEARS OF AGE BY
ELIMINATING THE EXISTING
EXCEPTION FOR 18-20-YEAR-OLDS ELIMINATING THE EXISTING
EXCEPTION FOR 18-20-YEAR-OLDS ELIMINATING THE EXISTING
EXCEPTION FOR 18-20-YEAR-OLDS
OR ELIMINATING THE EXISTING
EXCEPTION FOR 18-20-YEAR-OLDS
OR A ELIMINATING THE EXISTING
EXCEPTION FOR 18-20-YEAR-OLDS
OR A VALID ELIMINATING THE EXISTING
EXCEPTION FOR 18-20-YEAR-OLDS
OR A VALID HUNTING ELIMINATING THE EXISTING
EXCEPTION FOR 18-20-YEAR-OLDS
OR A VALID HUNTING LICENSE. EXCEPTION FOR 18-20-YEAR-OLDS
OR A VALID HUNTING LICENSE. EXCEPTION FOR 18-20-YEAR-OLDS
OR A VALID HUNTING LICENSE.
THAT EXCEPTION FOR 18-20-YEAR-OLDS
OR A VALID HUNTING LICENSE.
THAT IS EXCEPTION FOR 18-20-YEAR-OLDS
OR A VALID HUNTING LICENSE.
THAT IS A EXCEPTION FOR 18-20-YEAR-OLDS
OR A VALID HUNTING LICENSE.
THAT IS A BIG EXCEPTION FOR 18-20-YEAR-OLDS
OR A VALID HUNTING LICENSE.
THAT IS A BIG DEAL EXCEPTION FOR 18-20-YEAR-OLDS
OR A VALID HUNTING LICENSE.
THAT IS A BIG DEAL AND EXCEPTION FOR 18-20-YEAR-OLDS
OR A VALID HUNTING LICENSE.
THAT IS A BIG DEAL AND A EXCEPTION FOR 18-20-YEAR-OLDS
OR A VALID HUNTING LICENSE.
THAT IS A BIG DEAL AND A LOT EXCEPTION FOR 18-20-YEAR-OLDS
OR A VALID HUNTING LICENSE.
THAT IS A BIG DEAL AND A LOT OF OR A VALID HUNTING LICENSE.
THAT IS A BIG DEAL AND A LOT OF OR A VALID HUNTING LICENSE.
THAT IS A BIG DEAL AND A LOT OF
PEOPLE OR A VALID HUNTING LICENSE.
THAT IS A BIG DEAL AND A LOT OF
PEOPLE ARE OR A VALID HUNTING LICENSE.
THAT IS A BIG DEAL AND A LOT OF
PEOPLE ARE PRO-GUN OR A VALID HUNTING LICENSE.
THAT IS A BIG DEAL AND A LOT OF
PEOPLE ARE PRO-GUN ADVOCATES. THAT IS A BIG DEAL AND A LOT OF
PEOPLE ARE PRO-GUN ADVOCATES. THAT IS A BIG DEAL AND A LOT OF
PEOPLE ARE PRO-GUN ADVOCATES.
THEY THAT IS A BIG DEAL AND A LOT OF
PEOPLE ARE PRO-GUN ADVOCATES.
THEY LIKE THAT IS A BIG DEAL AND A LOT OF
PEOPLE ARE PRO-GUN ADVOCATES.
THEY LIKE TO THAT IS A BIG DEAL AND A LOT OF
PEOPLE ARE PRO-GUN ADVOCATES.
THEY LIKE TO HUNT, THAT IS A BIG DEAL AND A LOT OF
PEOPLE ARE PRO-GUN ADVOCATES.
THEY LIKE TO HUNT, BRITNEY. PEOPLE ARE PRO-GUN ADVOCATES.
THEY LIKE TO HUNT, BRITNEY. PEOPLE ARE PRO-GUN ADVOCATES.
THEY LIKE TO HUNT, BRITNEY.
>>PEOPLE ARE PRO-GUN ADVOCATES.
THEY LIKE TO HUNT, BRITNEY.
>>IT PEOPLE ARE PRO-GUN ADVOCATES.
THEY LIKE TO HUNT, BRITNEY.
>>IT IS PEOPLE ARE PRO-GUN ADVOCATES.
THEY LIKE TO HUNT, BRITNEY.
>>IT IS A PEOPLE ARE PRO-GUN ADVOCATES.
THEY LIKE TO HUNT, BRITNEY.
>>IT IS A HOT PEOPLE ARE PRO-GUN ADVOCATES.
THEY LIKE TO HUNT, BRITNEY.
>>IT IS A HOT TOPIC PEOPLE ARE PRO-GUN ADVOCATES.
THEY LIKE TO HUNT, BRITNEY.
>>IT IS A HOT TOPIC AND PEOPLE ARE PRO-GUN ADVOCATES.
THEY LIKE TO HUNT, BRITNEY.
>>IT IS A HOT TOPIC AND WE THEY LIKE TO HUNT, BRITNEY.
>>IT IS A HOT TOPIC AND WE THEY LIKE TO HUNT, BRITNEY.
>>IT IS A HOT TOPIC AND WE
WILL THEY LIKE TO HUNT, BRITNEY.
>>IT IS A HOT TOPIC AND WE
WILL SHARE THEY LIKE TO HUNT, BRITNEY.
>>IT IS A HOT TOPIC AND WE
WILL SHARE YOUR THEY LIKE TO HUNT, BRITNEY.
>>IT IS A HOT TOPIC AND WE
WILL SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS>>IT IS A HOT TOPIC AND WE
WILL SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

29 Comments

  • john carioscia

    RECALL THIS AMERICA HATING SOCIALIST P.O.S. CA. HE'S A PUBLIC SERVANT, NOT A KING, SAVE THE CONSTITUTION! GET RID OF HIM NOW!

  • Joey Benoit

    Governor f**** nuisance! Here he goes again jacking off the Patriots in California! Or the lemmings! Governor please jump jump off the Golden gate! Just do a line of blow and go!

  • jspizzle kratch

    I like how these ladies brought up hunting and hunters.
    I have advice for them hunters. Do not comply with your state's infringements on your guns.
    You Californians are letting the government decide which guns you can choose.

  • Otto Nicator

    I support such laws…

    I support Separation of Church and State also.. Mostly because I do not believe in the rehabilitation of Criminals and or repeat offenders… I support Capital punishment, also..

    Whatever can be done to go after Criminals, regardless of their demographic or denomination, to the fullest extent of the Law… If they want to be 'martyred', so be it…

    This World does not belong to Christians or Criminals….. Enough of their stories and fiction…….. Chip these people, 'Mark of the Beast', forget walls and 'State supervised Religion', enough of that…. Federally mandate everything…

  • November

    Step by step, inch by inch, they relentlessly work to disarm the public. And just like when turning off the power, the fires starts right after.

  • mohider khana

    Gavin Newsum has started the full scale CHICOM takeover of Cali while his PG&E buddies drive out the people and grab their land under after setting fires… watch as food becomes more expensive and harder to get. Invasion 2019 … High Treason

  • Cody M.

    This gun law will :
    1 . Allow your employer, family member or associate to notify authorities that you are an armed threat.
    2. Deny legal firearms purchase based on those claims by non-qualified assessment of mental health.
    3. Enact search warrants based on original claims by assessment to invade and confiscate all firearms from citizens homes based on original claim of eminent danger.
    This is not due process. This is the secret police of the USSR.
    They want bogus warrants based on false claims to kick your door down, take away the perceived threat.

  • Cody M.

    Please get out and sign the petition to recall Gavin Newsom in person at a location near you. We need to collect over 1 million signatures before February and that’s not even half the work to undo some of the damage that this monster and his predecessor have caused our beautiful state. 🇺🇸

  • Jimmy’s Tacoma

    Jimmy Drake for California Governor local man, husband, brother, father, union steward, and constitutionalist. A small town man with small business at heart. I will continue to fight evil and fight for the people to bring back justice to the people. Please spread the word and share.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *