I object to Judge Kavanaugh’s views on the 4th amendment: Napolitano
Articles,  Blog

I object to Judge Kavanaugh’s views on the 4th amendment: Napolitano


DEALS DURING THIS INCREDIBLE CELEBRATION IN JUST A BIT. NOW TO OUR TOP STORY THIS HALF HOUR, MAJOR MEETING, SUPREME COURT NOMINEE BRETT KAVANAUGH SET TO MIDDLE SET TO MEEDLE SET TO MEETLE SET TO MEET WITH WEST VIRGINIA SENATOR JOE MANSION TODAY. HE’S EXPECTED TO BE A PIVOTAL VOTE FOR KAVANAUGH’S CONFIRMATION THIS FALL. HERE NOW, JUDGE ANDREW NAPOLITANO. WHAT DO YOU THINK MANSION WANTS OUT OF THIS ONE?>>VOTES FROM HIS VERY DIFFICULT CONTEST WITH THE REPUBLICAN ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, A JERSEY GUY, WHO THIS IS THE INTERSECTION OF THE THEIR BEST INTEREST, THEIR INTEREST IN KEEPING THEIR JOB, TO VOTE AGAINST WHAT THE MAJORITY OF THEIR PARTY WANTS. I WOULDN’T BE SURPRISED IF JOE RE-ELECTION, TOUGH RACES IN STATES THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP CARRIED BY HEAVY MARGINS VOTE FOR JUDGE KAVANAUGH. I ALSO THINK THAT JUDGE KAVANAUGH DOES NOT NEED A SINGLE DEMOCRATIC VOTE BECAUSE I THINK ALL THE REPUBLICANS WILL VOTE FOR HIM. JOHN McCAIN NOT VOTING AND AND COMFORTABLE FOR MANSION AND THE OTHERS TO VOTE FOR HIM. IT LETS THEM SCORE POINTS AT HOME AND THEY WEREN’T THE OTHERS PULL AWAY FROM BRETT KAVANAUGH, THEN MITCH McCONNELL MUST HAVE THOSE DEMOCRATS, OTHERWISE THE NOMINATION LOSES. I DON’T SEE THAT HAPPENING. MIGHT CAUSE CONCERN ABOUT THIS JUSTICE. IS THERE ANYTHING?>>THERE ARE REPUBLICANS, I AMONG THEM, WHO OBJECT TO JUDGE KAVANAUGH’S VIEWS ON THE FOURTH AMENDMENT. I CHARACTERIZED HIS NOMINATION AT THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF THE TYPE OF PERSON PRESIDENT TRUMP NOMINATED IN NEIL GORSUCH AND SAID HE WOULD NOMINATE. THIS JUDGE IS FROM THE HEART AND SOUL OF THE WASHINGTON ESTABLISHMENT. HIS ENTIRE LIFE WITH THE EXCEPTION OF HIS SEVEN YEARS AT YALE, WE’LL GRANT HIM THOSE SEVEN YEARS AT YALE, YOU WORE>>HAS BEEN SPENT AS PART OF THE WASHINGTON ESTABLISHMENT. THE PARTICULAR STICKING POINT WITH SENATOR PAUL AND SENATOR LEE AND THOSE OF US WHO BELIEVE THAT THE CONSTITUTION MEANS WHAT IT SAYS IS THE FOURTH AMENDMENT. JUDGE KAVANAUGH HAS WRITTEN THAT INTELLIGENCE IS NOT COVERED BY THE FOURTH AMENDMENT, MEANING THE NSA CAN SPY ALL THEY LIKE. WITH THE EXCEPTION OF HIS OPINION, THERE’S NO OPINION HOLDING THAT. CHERYL: THERE’S A LOT OF CONFIDENCE ABOUT KAVANAUGH’S CONSISTENT FORM — CONFIRMATION. MARIA SPOKE WITH THE VICE PRESIDENT.>>I THINK THE VICE PRESIDENT IS CORRECT, THEY WON’T NEED THE DEMOCRATIC VOTES. CHERYL: LISTEN TO WHAT HE TOLD HER ABOUT THE NOMINATION. LISTEN TO THIS.>>FOR THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES IN THIS DELIBERATION, HE WAS LOOKING FOR A JUDGE WITH EXTRAORDINARY CREDENTIALS AND I THINK CREDENTIALS IND I THINK CREDENTIALS I T I THINK CREDENTIALS I THI THINK CREDENTIALS I THINK LNK JUDGE THAT WOULD NOT LEGISLATE FROM THE BENCH. WE REMAIN CONFIDENT THAT BEFORE THE FALL IS OUT THAT JUDGE BRETT KAVANAUGH WILL BE JUSTICE BRETT KAVANAUGH.>>I THINK HE’S CORRECT THAT HE WILL BE ON THE BENCH BEFORE THE FIRST MONDAY IN NOVEMBER WHICH IS BEFORE THE NEW SUPREME COURT SESSION BEGINS. I DON’T THINK SHUCK SHY — CHUCK SCHUMER HAS THE MUSCLE. CHERYL: WHAT DOES THAT MEAN FOR MIDTERMS, ACTUALLY. WHAT DO YOU THINK IS GOING TO HAPPEN COMING DOWN THE PIKE, WHAT CASES, YOU’RE WORRIED ABOUT THE FOURTH AMENDMENT ISSUE, WHAT CASES DO YOU SEE THAT THEY COULD HEAR AS THE NEXT SUPREME COURT SITS?>>NOT BEFORE THE MIDTERM BUT THEY WILL EVENTUALLY BE HEARING IN ORDER TO GET INTO OR GET PLACE. I ONCE ASKED JUSTICE SCALIA ABOUT THIS. HE SAID I DON’T THINK I SHOULD ANSWER. I KNOW THAT CASE — I ASKED HIM THIS IN FRONT OF AN AUDIENCE — THE CASE IS MAKING ITS WAY TO THE SUPREME COURT. THAT WILL PROBABLY MAKE ITS WAY TO THE SUPREME COURT ASSUMING HE’S CONFIRMED IN THE NEXT TWO MONTHS IN HIS FIRST YEAR ON THE BENCH. CHERYL: I HAVE TO ASK YOU ABOUT WHAT DO YOU MAKE ABOUT THAT?>>SHE ONCE SAID IF DONALD TRUMP WAS ELECTED PRESIDENT SHE WOULD MOVE TO CANADA. I DON’T KNOW WHERE THE NUMBER FIVE CAME FROM. SHE IS REALLY UP THERE IN YEARS, THE OLDEST JUSTICE WE HAD THAT WEPT ON IN 63 AND RETIRED AT 93. SO SHE STILL HAS A LITTLE WAYS TO GO.>>SHE’S 85.>>SHE’S ONLY 85.>>AND THE CALISTHENICS. EXERCISES EVERY DAY.>>WINE AND EXERCISE. CHERYL: THERE YOU GO, WINE AND EXERCISE.>>NOT A BAD COMBINATION, EVEN AT 7:45 IN THE MORNING.>>AT LEAST I HAVE ONE OF THE TWO DOWN. CHERYL: AND THERE’S FOOD ON THE SHOW AS WELL.>>WHERE’S THE CHEESECAKE.

67 Comments

  • Marky Mark

    Bible Prophecy says All world goverments/U.N. Will turn on all religions globally..The last standing religion will be that of Gods, and once they try to attack that last religion it's like poking God in the eye ball, great anger comes upon them ungodly people instantly sudden destruction.

  • Patz13

    Brett Kavanaugh thinks the 4th Amendment does NOT apply to intelligence??? That is so weird!!! Of course intelligence is the same as law enforcement. Kavanaugh has some weird ideas.

  • Gigi Devoe

    OMG: I'm org. from W VA. How did we elect a gay pedifile?
    Kavannah seems very gay & seems WAY TO INTERESTED IN HIS DAUGHTERS. SO MUCH INCEST GOING ON WITHIN ELITE FAMILIES!

  • Direbear Coat

    That's the one thing that I really do not like about Kavanaugh. His take on the Forth Amendment is way off. The Forth Amendment does NOT make any exception for spy agencies to spy on Americans. Law Enforcement need a warrant from a judge to search your house, your papers, etc.

    Law Enforcement is government. Well, the NSA, CIA, FBI, etc are all spy agencies, but they are government too. The Forth Amendment just says that GOVERNMENT shall not search your stuff with out a warrant. It doesn't make any exception for spy agencies, but that is Kavanaugh's argument. He's saying that it does make an exception for spy agencies.

    That is wrong. That is what opens the doors, even wider, towards a police state. The doors towards a police state were opened when the Patriot Act was created. Kavanaugh's stance on the forth Amendment pushes the door towards a police state even wider. It weakens Americans' rights from unreasonable search and seizure by the government.

  • StephenNu9

    With respect to the 4th Amendment, the government does need a mechanism to protect itself from foreign and domestic enemies. Some latitude is needed for that.

  • PrairieSkies S

    It's probably illegal for the President to "crow" a little bit when he "tweets" on Twitter about all his successes!

  • Scottie Palm

    i cant believe this is being allowed to go on its going to completely destroy our constitution and country. it very clearly states the president is the one who nominates judges to the bench and the senate are there to confirm he or she is qualified and competent and for dems to say they are going to use there position to not vote for someone simply because they dont like the president is a total disgrace every man and women of congress who were honorable and did there duty and would be disgusted

  • Salty Bear

    Oh yea, West Virginia has had democrat representatives for decades…. Why do you think the river that flows through Logan has been filthy since the 70's….. Because Demorats don't clean up dick.

  • Farmer Dude357

    There is no 4th amendment in America. When Nazi dogs search your belonging against your will, the 4th no longer exists.

  • dafttool

    I object to any Supreme Court Justice believing presidents are immune from investigations, making them above the law. There are a lot of things I have ideological issues with him, but the one thing I feel strongest about is his giving presidents a free pass. (And let’s be clear, defenders of him, you can’t impeach a president if you can’t investigate wrongdoings. This isn’t just about the criminal Trump; believe it or not, but some future president could even be worse, & the people need recourse. If Hillary had been elected, wouldn’t you want the option to investigate her if wrongdoing was suspected?) We got rid of kings for a reason. I repeat, NO MAN IS ABOVE THE LAW

  • Crunchy Taco

    Nappy is a tool, but he's right here. Kavanaugh doesn't respect our 4th amendment. That alone disqualifies him. We need someone that fully abides by our constitution and it's amendments.

  • Dennis G

    If you remember way back when Trump was elected Nap was Ra, Ra, Trump Then he interviewed Nap and he wasn't given any job , Then He was not on the list of possible Supreme Court Judges that frosted Nap and changed him to what he is now. Apparently Nap the snowflake didn't get his way now he is pouting and FOX is letting this self centered talk as an expert attack Trump anyway he can on the sly. At least CNN doe's not hide their feelings like this SNAKE

  • myron huddleston

    A Judge's word should be as good as gold , everyday that she remains on the bench is an insult to her fellow judges and just proves her word as worthless as used toilet paper .

  • brian

    Kavanaugh won't get in .. Trump will have to look for someone the country will except. The process won't allow him in. Trump should have just picked a decent and fair man from the beginning.
    This will be attempt #2 to try and get him on the the supreme court. Kavanaugh tried for 3 agonizing years during President Bush administration to get in but failed.

  • Bob Johnson

    John McCain is operating strictly on his hate for Trump. He is obsessed about how Trump won and he lost a presidential election. I imagine he lays awake at night gnashing his teeh and tossing and turning trying to figure out why he lost and Trump won. It is so simple; he is a life-long RINO. Ginsberg's hate for Conservatives is what keeps her going. She is too hateful to just retire or even die.

  • Tom Adams

    Trump explicitly said he had a litmus test then back-pedaled. Kavanaugh is unlikely to recognize 40 plus years in the right to choose as compelling. It's highly likely he would vote to overturn Roe vs Wade. Kavanaugh the fat-head is not the the brainy person the right makes him out to be

  • Daniel Sanders

    What I want to know is… If I whip my nob out in public…does the 4th adherent…excuse me, admenedment.. protect me from prosecution? If not this is not news I am interested in

  • GrantAugustus1

    I DONT TRUST MANCHIN OR NAPOLITANO SORRY NOT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE SENATOR BEST INTREST OF THE PEOPLE PEOPLE ELECT SENATORS HOUSE OF REPS AND PRES SO KAVANAUGH if the majority want him in more than LIKELY HE WILL BE IN!!! AND SENATORS WATCH OUT BECUASE HE IS NOT IN MOST OF YOU SENATORS WILL BE OUT POST HASTE!!

  • GrantAugustus1

    The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights that prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures. It requires "reasonable" governmental searches and seizures to be conducted only upon issuance of a warrant, judicially sanctioned by probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized. Under the Fourth Amendment, search and seizure should be limited in scope according to specific information supplied to the issuing court, usually by a law enforcement officer who has sworn by it. Fourth Amendment case law deals with three issues: what government activities constitute "search" and "seizure"; what constitutes probable cause for these actions; and how violations of Fourth Amendment rights should be addressed. Early court decisions limited the amendment's scope to a law enforcement officer's physical intrusion onto private property, but with Katz v. United States, the Supreme Court held that its protections, such as the warrant requirement, extend to the privacy of individuals as well as physical locations. Law enforcement officers need a warrant for most search and seizure activities, but the Court has defined a series of exceptions for consent searches, motor vehicle searches, evidence in plain view, exigent circumstances, border searches, and other situations.

  • GrantAugustus1

    OK WHEN IT COMES TO INTELLIGENCE SO WAS IT ILLEGAL FOR SOMEONE TO GIVE TRUE NEWS STORIES AT THE TIME TO THEN candidate TRUMP that showed TRUE EVIDENCE THAT HILLARY WAS GUILTY and that was PURE RAW INTELLIGENCE yet the GOV DID NOT DO ANY INVESTIGATIONS ON THE EMAILS!!!

  • GrantAugustus1

    WELL CELL PHONES ARE PERSONAL USE IF THEY WERE BOUGHT PERSONALLY THEN I DO SAY YES A WARRANT NOW IF ITS A BUSINESS PHONE I THINK SAME STILL APPLIES BUT INTELLIGENCE NO WAY!!!

  • Edward Stack Sr

    Napolitano objects? They are not in a court of law and his opinion is unwarranted because is running for a higher position than that Napolitano holds! Critics are a dime a dozen……cheap and inexpensive.

  • Jimmy Crickets

    Trump has to get rid of Obamabinladen and Hilary anti patriots mad Maxine Waters should be in jail next to the other two

  • Larry Larry

    U mush ask about him being SES.. Then ur letting thr fox in the hen house..for life.. There has be. Get these trained sleeper Traitors. All 10,000. Of them are guilty
    Of colusion to commit Treason. A poleygraph a
    Become required daily attire. It is the eye to the soul. Get the roll of the SES out them all, fire them,
    Judge them punish them.

  • Boldly Setting Captives Free

    United States Protestant Christians should be outraged! Roughly 49% of Americans (U.S. Citizens) are Protestant Christians. ZERO % of U.S. Supreme Court Justices are Protestant Christians. Why?

  • Steve Laupert

    Thanks for the judges information on this appointee so my gut feeling on this guy was correct what is trump doing? This shows trump is for the establishment and he ain’t draining the swamp! You can tell a guys policies by there posture and this Brett guy is soft too free with his emotions

  • Mel Gonzalez

    Ask this Ivy League clown why he's ok, with his buddy Ken Starr sex scandal at Baylor university. He's also,ok with the orange toad in Washington grabbing on women. What a sham this guy is. The law is shit, when your getting paid.

  • Big E

    By the time this show aired, Senator Josef Feinstein had received the letter from Dr. Ford and nobody was told except those in the inner sanctum. Not until the confirmation hearing was it leaked and allegations brought forth. Sure smacks of a show trial.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *