Articles

Kellyanne Conway Claims It Is Unconstitutional To Embarrass Trump


Kellyanne Conway is many things but a legal
scholar. She certainly is not. This past weekend during an appearance on
Fox News, Sunway, ah, Sunday, Kellyanne Conway made the following statement about what is
apparently, at least according to her in the constitution, here it is, [tear on impeachment. What does he think about those in the house
pursuing it? Complete nonsense. Even Jerry now said, oh impeachment is just
a term. This is a process. They can’t even, they need to get a messaging
meeting and they need to read the constitution. The Democratic Party are we seeing American? The congress work for you. They work for you and they’re wasting your
money and their time on trying to impeach a president where there are no high crimes
and misdemeanors. They thought the Mueller report would be the
end all. They even had Bob Muller come and talk about
the Muller important. It was a disaster. So they work for you. Tell them to vote on the US MCA, get that
trade deal done. Tell them drug pricing, infrastructure, keep
this great economy humming along and stop the nonsense of harassing and embarrassing
this president. And the people around him when you have no
constitutional or legal basis to do so.] So I guess there you have it folks. The Democrats are kind of up a creek at this
point because according to Kellyanne Conway, it is unconstitutional to embarrass the president
of the United States. Uh, you can’t harass him. You can’t embarrass him, you can’t launch
investigations. Cause Kellyanne Conway says all of that is
anti-constitution. Now, if Kellyanne Conway would actually take
the time to read the US constitution, she would understand that we do have a system
of checks and balances and that the US congress does have a responsibility to the American
public to hold the president of the United States accountable when necessary. If it embarrassed him, oh well there is no
a clause that says, oh, you can investigate if it’s going to embarrass him. That doesn’t exist. So you can carry out these investigations
if it reveals horrible info. So be it kind of like with the Bill Clinton’s
impeachment hearing in the nineties we didn’t need to know all of that, but we do. And for those of us who lived through it,
unfortunately those, uh, words and images are burned into our brains and I’m willing
to bet that that embarrassed President Bill Clinton, but at the same time, you didn’t
have brain dead Democrats coming out saying, oh, it’s own constitutional to embarrass him. They talked about how ridiculous it was, sure,
but never tried to claim that it was unconstitutional to be carrying out these investigations. And here’s the thing, and this is what Kellyanne
Conway doesn’t seem to understand. The more she goes out there and says that
these investigations should not exist, that it’s presidential harassment or that it’s
unconstitutional, the more guilty it makes her boss look. So she better pray that embarrassing the president
never becomes unconstitutional because she’s probably going to be the first one prosecuted
under that brand new amendment that may be Republicans are in fact working on, who knows,
because they’re all a little bit crazy these days. The Democrats have the authority to carry
out these investigations. The Democrats have a responsibility to carry
out these investigations and let the public know the truth of what’s going on. And again, if it happens to embarrass the
president and the process, maybe he should have thought about that one before he decided
to run for president, but more importantly, number two, before he did the really bad things,
that would be embarrassing if anybody ever found out about them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *