Owaisi ने Triple Talaq को Sabarimala से Compare किया? | Triple Talaq Bill 2019
Articles,  Blog

Owaisi ने Triple Talaq को Sabarimala से Compare किया? | Triple Talaq Bill 2019


So apparently the Sabarimala and Triple talaq issues are the same Hell and welcome to The Show, thank you for watching and thank you for joining me! The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill 2019, is the first legislation to be tabled in Parliament by Modi’s new govt. Seeking to justify the need to bring in the legislation, Prasad said there were 543 cases of triple talaq (instant divorce) reported in the country. After the Supreme Court judgement banning triple talaq practise, Prasad said more than 200 cases were reported Under instant triple talaq, a Muslim man can divorce his wife by uttering talaq three times in one go, and it has detroyed many women’s lives the the past few years. This is the same bill, that many people may remember as the bill that the secular congress party said that will remove if they came to power. But anyway people remember what happened in May The provisions of the bill wereAll declarations of instant triple talaq, including in written or electronic form, will be void (i.e. not enforceable in law) and illegal. Instant triple talaq remains a cognizable offence with a maximum of three years imprisonment and a fine. The amount of any fine is at the discretion of the magistrate hearing the case The offence will be cognizable only if information relating to the offence is given by the wife or one of her blood relatives. The offence is non-bailable. However, there is a provision that the magistrate hearing the case may grant bail to the accused. The bail may be granted only after hearing the wife and if the magistrate is satisfied that there exist reasonable grounds for granting bail. So as expected there were some opposition to the bill and one of the big oppositions to the bill came from the beloved of liberals, the paragon of secularism, Hyderabad MP and All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen chief Asaduddin Owaisi Those opposing the Bill have argued that if instant triple talaq does not result in divorce in the wake of the Supreme Court order, how a Muslim man would be forced to provide subsistence to the woman, who is still his wife legally.The husband will be three years in jail then who is going to pay for the maintenance? I think there are some good questions to be asked and I don’t think the bill is perfect and just like the dowry bill, this bill can also be misused But that’s not enough, the point of being aliberal is that you MUST go over the top. He said, “Through this, I would like to ask the government that they have all the love for Muslim women. Why don’t they have the same sentiment for Hindu women of Kerala? Why are you against Sabarimala?” This is a nice strategy: act as if Sabarimala and Triple talaq is the same thing: If you have so much care for Hindu women, then lets compare the two situations First and foremost, the lives of women are not affected if they are not entering into a single particular Temple. However, if a woman is given Triple Talaq by her husband, it throws her entire life into chaos. Secondly, the traditions at Sabarimala Temple are not universal in nature. It is not even a universal aspect of every Temple of Bhagavan Ayyapa. It is specific to that particular Temple alone. Therefore, if a woman wishes to worship Him, she can still go to other Temples dedicated to Him The Muslim custom is applicable to every single woman of the community and there is no escape from it, it hangs like a sword around their neck at every moment of their life. At any time, her life can be destroyed anywhere in the country and they have no help the Sabarimala traditions do not have the capacity to oppress women unlike the custom of Triple Talaq As a consequence of Triple Talaq, many women are then subjected to the extremely evil tradition of Nikah Halala Nikah-halala is a practice of a divorced woman having to consummate the marriage with another man and then getting a divorce from him before remarrying her previous husband. We abuse pakistan so much, it is a failed state and a terrorist nation, but even they have banned Triple talaq, but we are so secular that we don’t even ban the most blatant human rights abuses. Women’s lives can be ruined, but secularism shouldn’t ever be in danger. This is the argument of the seculars Its om to question the Bill, but these silly comparisons do not help at all What do you think? let me know below? Make sure to like, share & subscribe! Consider supporting on Patreon! make sure to subscribe and press the bell icon, I will see you next time, and until then, stay happy, stay healthy and I’ll see you soon!

100 Comments

  • The Sham Sharma Show

    Do you guys feel this comparison is justified? What are your thoughts on the bill? Let me know below!

  • NK

    Laandyaa laayandaa hai.. U cannot speak 🗣 & debate any sense with a laandyaa… Sab kuch ulta… Hindu mooch rakhte hai but shave karte hai. Laandyaa ulta… No mooch aur jehadee daadee…. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • KR KU

    No no no … It's equal to Nida Khan They are your mothers, daughters, sisters, grandmothers, grand daughters all Nida Khans! https://youtu.be/pnov8qprllk PROGRESSIVE MUSLIMS Imam – TRUTH https://youtu.be/ElY8sRu9Hi0 – learn more- https://youtu.be/Qf_UX7WnSWs Moo's think they are God's and are leftovers of Genghis Khan Mongol methods introduced after wiping out 4th Caliphate – Genghis Khan's shamans/priests took over preaching. Pure FACT.

  • KR KU

    NIDAKHAN – https://youtu.be/9J2zuFA3eKg why HalalaRAPE UR mothers, daughters, sisters, grandmothers, grand daughters Nida Khans! https://youtu.be/pnov8qprllk PROGRESSIVE MUSLIMS Imam – TRUTH https://youtu.be/ElY8sRu9Hi0 – learn more- https://youtu.be/Qf_UX7WnSWs Moo's think they are God's and are leftovers of Genghis Khan Mongol methods introduced after wiping out 4th Caliphate – Genghis Khan's shamans/priests took over preaching. Pure FACT.

  • Durga Prasad Gollapalli

    Sir you missed out on the point that, Hindu Women not allowed in one sabarimala temple but muslim women not allowed in all mosques.

  • INDRANIL MUKHERJEE

    Jiska khudka wajudhi baimani aur jhut ki buniyaad per hai wo kisi mudde pe sawal utana ka kabil nehi hai… Iska utni hasiyaat hi nehi hai… Raha is deshdorhi ka comment ki ye shale kavi vi kisika nehi hoga q ki inke khun mai hi baimaani hai…

  • Atharva Wankhede Jr.

    yaar sham….kyu rahul gandhi ka mazak udaaya 1:57 …bhai paani pee raha tha n mai…thuk dida pura laptop keyboard pr..

  • Manish

    This frustrated and idiot Owaisi only talks about divorced Hindu women, constitution, jallikattu, sabarimala ban etc. He is good for nothing for his own community and I bet this guy is such a coward that he will actually shout 100 times Vande Mataram when someone keep knife on his neck.

  • B4d Bucky

    मुझे तो ऐसा लगता है की ओवैसी 1 no. का निहायती चू*या प्राणी है।

  • Unnat

    I too have written about this issue in my article secular India, tried posting on OpIndia but haven't been published yet.

  • Vinod Thakker.

    Owaisi was a Hindu, Indian and will remain so until he is alive, but die is a Muslim! Nothing is for ever except a way of righteousness which is for ever. This is a route which Hindus follow.

  • Ambarsaria

    please ek video is par bhi banao .शर्मा जी नेपाल सरकार भारतीय चैनलों को नेपाल में बंद करने के लिए एक नया कानून जा चुकी है ऐसा करने से अब पाकिस्तानी और चाइना के चैनल ही नेपाली dekh सकेंगे इससे भारत और हिंदुओं का प्रभाव नेपाल पर खत्म हो जाएगा l भारत और हिंदुओं के खिलाफ जहर nepalion में भरा जाएगा l प्लीज इस पर भी एक वीडियो बनाइए lनेपाल चाइना के कंट्रोल में आकर यह सब कुछ कर रहा है l,🕉️🕉️🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • Amit Kushwaha

    if they want to be subhumans , let them be , no need of banning triple talak. But i want population control and polygamy ban in india. rest can be ignored because they (community asa whole ) are too much subs to be elevated to the standards of a human.

  • Sarat Saratchandran

    Temple practices can't be compared with local Mulla made Talaq practices, not part of Koran or the practices of major Muslim countries. They are a misogynist agenda cooked up in financially depriving Muslim women of their rightful claim of the marital wealth and equality, in case of separation, more over it an indecent act.

  • Techno Crat

    I don't agree with ur argument that if a person is jailed then how can he pay subsistence. This is ridiculous. Giving triple talak is a criminal offense of destroying the life of that woman and her children thrown on the road. He can pay the subsistence in the same way when people are jailed in other criminal offence and also are charged with fines for thousands of Rs. If they can't pay these fines then their imprisonment is extended as per IPC. Prisoners have savings with themselves and their families. also they earn some nominal amount when they r in jail when they do rigorous imprisonment as per Indian Law. Secondly it's not just dowry laws, every law can be abused in some way or the other, but this can't be a precinct to not make a law. I think ur opinion against criminalizing triple talaq is a greatest blunder that an educated mind can make

  • Krishan Kumar

    Behuda hai Owaisi… arey ye toh humesha se hi bahyaat baatein karta hai…Muslim dharm me har pyaar mohabbataur acchi baatein kabool nahi hai, par saalo se maar kaat ki baat kar lo toh avval hai ye, triple talaq ko bilkul laagu karna chahiye not because only because it ruins muslim Women’s life but also because all women of a nation should have equivalent right and Sabarimala aur triple talaq ko ek bolne Wala saala kaana ho sakta hai. Ek aankh ka andha.. Owaisi ainwayi

  • Surbhi Gupta

    Things will get worse if congress won't change its attitude. If congress still oppose triple talaq then 52 seats will reduce further.

  • A.Anantha Padmanabhan Padmanabhan

    Owaisi's comparison is a foolish one. First of all women entry in sabarimala doesn't means all women are banned. Only women who is in menstrual age is banned. Secondly, how can anyone just compare it with a system that makes a women's life insecure for whole life. She will go under difficulties even for food. This comparison is just for bla bla bla.

  • Bornagain Human

    Owaisi is Razakar spawn. Anywhere else, he wouldnt even have been born considering what his four fathers did against indian natives. We have nobody else to blame except ourselves.

  • Ganesh Dore

    TTT law as framed by Ravi Shankar Prasad has a bail provision. Thus law has teeth ( arrest ) and man can approach a judge quickly for bail . and Magistrate can decide on " guzara Basta " . Milord.. ye point note kiya jaye.

  • smita bade

    Ofcourse they are not same n non comparable.. Its just diversion tactics by opportunist ppl like owaici n congress 😏

  • Nix Awesome

    I like Assauddin Owaisi… look how he defends India really well in international platforms and media (even in pakistan). He is pro-India…he is Indian… but when it comes to religious thoughts kuch chezein match nahi hoti…

  • Mirrorwarrior

    Well the entire Sabrimala issue was started by Communists/Urban Naxals, Islamofascists and Christian Evangelicals. None of the actual devotees questioned it as there are similar temples where men are not allowed. Triple talaq is a violation of the civil rights of a person. Well no wonder they are still so backward.

  • Seema Agarwal

    Dear bro Sham…I am from Chennai and I totally respect the sanctity of Sabrimalai temple … people of all the four states really have not just religious but emotional sentiments for this temple…and as a woman I hv no issues in waiting till age 50 if at all I think of visiting It makes no difference to my life as a woman.

  • Pranav Venugopal

    Diety ayappa in sabarimala is naisthik brahmachari. Its not that women are not allowed. Women of a certain age not allowed.
    Many are ignorant

  • vik -17

    Hindu man ( modi ) supporting Muslim women in triple talaq
    and muslim men (owasi) is supporting Hindu women in sabrimala 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    In short modi hate women's and owasi hate women 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

  • zafar sadik

    tell about those 22 lac hindu women who are married but abandoned by husband. their life is actually destroyed not those triple talaq women becoz they can marry and settle their life again instead of living with a husband who dont want to stay with his wife anymore. but triple talaq is not valid according to islamic law and even as per indian law after supreme court judgement. more important is to make a law for those abandoned hindu women and send modi to jail…sabarimala is a case of gender equality which is more serious than a civil contract of marriage.

  • 666 DemonKiller

    Modiji honestly muslim aurto ke wajah se jeete hai. Ab kuch baki hai toh un aurto ko wapis Hindu dharm ko apnana hai. Kyunki waisr bhi unke purvajo ko jabardasti convert kiya tha

  • Jay J

    Ladies must be allowed as per supreme court directive.Some decades back the temple owned and operated by "Mala araya" community .They did "Jyothi" .
    Then ladies allowed. Now they also ask for their rights on temple as they control some surrounding temples. They told Brahmins forcefully took temple from them .They also want to get it back.

  • Aman Singh

    Anything or religious which consist violation of Human Rights shall not exist. Triple talaq is one of them. Is cheese Par kabhi bill Tayar hi nai hona Chahiye tha direct action hona Chahiye tha. Us action ke koi aade aata hai jail me dalo unko. Bhadva mulla Ho ya koi bhi Ho. Simple talaq norms means there should be equally importance given to both male and female to get separated. If male wants to separate with female and female doesn't then such rules applies that the female is entitle to get half of the property. Just like with the Hindu family. There should not be separate law.

  • plant trees

    In prostitution – a man uses many women
    In triple talaq – a man uses many women

    Prostitution- it's illegal
    Triple talaq- it's very much legal

  • Tharun Tez

    one more thing about this triple talaq is that there would be a 3 months notice period after husband gives triple talaq to his wife. divorce would be completed after 3 months. there is an option of reunion with in these 3 months but again, husband can use that TTT statement for second time as well in this period. this is the marriage law muslims practice in our country 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ .. how can someone compare this to sabarimala issue ?

  • Lagey Raho Online

    I challenge any FemiNazi to have a debate with any so called scholar of Islam ie. Oweisi. Questions are allowed to ask to Hinduism or Sanatan, dare to ask Islam… What the hell is this thing called secularism???

  • santhosh yadav

    Chutisala… Halala nikah.. Bahut pasand aisa….. Kaisa support karta.. Hay… Woo ladkiyo ko pucho kitna saal saja dena… Woo.. Tho… Minimum 20sal jail me dalna bol raha hay

  • Poonam Abbi

    Sham SharmA, BANDHU, aap ka logic aur argument hi GAKLAT HAI… AAP KA RESPONSE GALAT HAI… J BHI TRIPLE TALAQ AUR SABRAMALAI ko compare kar ke ek hi bata rahe hain, un se poochho, ki triple talaq to BEEWI APNE SHAUHAR KE TALAQ DENE KE BAAD APNA HAQ MAANG RAHI HAI…. sABARAMALAI MEIN JAANEY KI DEMAND KARNE WALI AURTEIN NA TO HINDU HAIN, NA SABARAMALAI KE AYYAPPA SWAMI MEIN VISHWAAS KARTI HAIN, NA HI UN KI BEEWI HAIN… KIS HAQ S SABARAMALAI MEIN ENTRY KI DEMAND HAE ISAIYON, MUSLN, SECULARS, NON BELIEVERS, INTELLECTUALS SIRF SHOR MACHAANEY KE LIYE HAI… IN KO DHAKKA DO… AAP IN KE SAATH BEHAS KARNA BHAINS KE AAGAY BEEN BAJANA HAI…

    JO AURAT SABARAMALAI MEIN NAHI ALLOWED, USKO KHANE KE LAALEY NAHI PAD JAATEY, USKI JEEVIKA BAND NAHI HOTI. tRIPLE TALAQ MEIN MUSALMANO KI YE AME HAI… WO BEEWIYAAN KAREIN UN SE BACHCHON KI FAUJ PAIDA KAREIN AUR PHR HINDUON KE SAR PAR DAAL S=DEIN UNHEIN PAALNA AUR PAAL KAR FIDAAYEN BANANEY KE LIYE.

  • RAHUL PURUSHOTHAMAN

    https://www.opindia.com/2019/05/love-jihad-is-not-a-figment-of-the-right-wing-imagination-it-is-a-real-and-present-danger/

  • Divyesh Raiyani

    अरे ओ भोसडीवाले चाचा 😊😊😊
    ये वाला एक दम ज़ोरदार था

  • Sharmi

    Is there also brutal circumcision for Muslim young girls in India, such as in Africa and the Middle East?
    Do Muslim women have or take the right to give their opinions about 3x talaq?

  • amit Patel

    Halala it a dirty way to get back together
    Just get back together by ghar wapsi
    And stick together to ur purvaj religion
    Hinduism

  • anurag tyagi

    भाई मैं आपकी सारी वीडियो देखता हूं आपकी वीडियो से मुझे बहुत कुछ जानने का मौका मिला और आप से मेरी एक प्रार्थना है कि आप अधिकतर वीडियो हिंदी में बताएं जिससे आपकी बात सभी देशवासियों तक पहुंच सके धन्यवाद
    जय श्री राम
    भारत माता की जय

  • Sivasairam Chitrada

    Indian temples are not meant for worship but to get energised. Sabarimala Ayyappa Temple is energised in such a way that it is not meant for female bodies capable of menstruation. Their body won't be conducive during that age & is fatal also. People aware of Prāna prathishta ( Consecration & Energising ) can easily sense the difference in that premises.

    There are temples called KĀMĀKHYA, exclusively designed for Women menstruation & reproduction.

    There are temples called Bhairavi Temples ( absolute feminine energy loaded temples ) no way allowed for male bodies ( men ) where it can seriously damage men.

    Why don't these liberals come & fight for MEN's rights & equality there at Bhairavi Temple & Kāmākhya temples !?!

    Brainless beliefs can lead human no where but grave alone.

  • Manikyan H

    You are accusing secular people for this???
    May be u should only use the term Leftists for this.

    Because do u know that secular people like freethinkers of Kerala are pro UCC and anti triple talaq and had spoken and done debate in many cases.

  • Ali Siddiq

    उसने सबरीमाला का नाम लिया और आपकी गांड जल गई। बस यही कमेंट करने था।

  • GREAT VOICE

    साबरी माला में सिर्फ कच्छे में एंट्री होनी चाइए । लुगाई आना अपने आप बन्द होजाएगी ।

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *