Texas domestic violence bill vetoed over last-minute amendment | KVUE
Articles,  Blog

Texas domestic violence bill vetoed over last-minute amendment | KVUE


IT IT COULD IT COULD HAVE IT COULD HAVE BEEN IT COULD HAVE BEEN A IT COULD HAVE BEEN A BIG IT COULD HAVE BEEN A BIG COMFORT IT COULD HAVE BEEN A BIG COMFORT
TO IT COULD HAVE BEEN A BIG COMFORT
TO DOMESTIC IT COULD HAVE BEEN A BIG COMFORT
TO DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE IT COULD HAVE BEEN A BIG COMFORT
TO DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE VICTIMS IT COULD HAVE BEEN A BIG COMFORT
TO DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE VICTIMS IN IT COULD HAVE BEEN A BIG COMFORT
TO DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE VICTIMS IN TEXAS… IT COULD HAVE BEEN A BIG COMFORT
TO DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE VICTIMS IN TEXAS… A TO DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE VICTIMS IN TEXAS… A TO DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE VICTIMS IN TEXAS… A
BETTER TO DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE VICTIMS IN TEXAS… A
BETTER SYSTEM VIOLENCE VICTIMS IN TEXAS… A
BETTER SYSTEM VIOLENCE VICTIMS IN TEXAS… A
BETTER SYSTEM
TO VIOLENCE VICTIMS IN TEXAS… A
BETTER SYSTEM
TO INFORM VIOLENCE VICTIMS IN TEXAS… A
BETTER SYSTEM
TO INFORM THEM VIOLENCE VICTIMS IN TEXAS… A
BETTER SYSTEM
TO INFORM THEM AND VIOLENCE VICTIMS IN TEXAS… A
BETTER SYSTEM
TO INFORM THEM AND AUTHORITES BETTER SYSTEM
TO INFORM THEM AND AUTHORITES BETTER SYSTEM
TO INFORM THEM AND AUTHORITES
ABOUT BETTER SYSTEM
TO INFORM THEM AND AUTHORITES
ABOUT WHAT TO INFORM THEM AND AUTHORITES
ABOUT WHAT TO INFORM THEM AND AUTHORITES
ABOUT WHAT
BOND TO INFORM THEM AND AUTHORITES
ABOUT WHAT
BOND CONDITION TO INFORM THEM AND AUTHORITES
ABOUT WHAT
BOND CONDITION ATTACKERS TO INFORM THEM AND AUTHORITES
ABOUT WHAT
BOND CONDITION ATTACKERS HAVE. ABOUT WHAT
BOND CONDITION ATTACKERS HAVE. ABOUT WHAT
BOND CONDITION ATTACKERS HAVE.
BUT ABOUT WHAT
BOND CONDITION ATTACKERS HAVE.
BUT THAT ABOUT WHAT
BOND CONDITION ATTACKERS HAVE.
BUT THAT LAW ABOUT WHAT
BOND CONDITION ATTACKERS HAVE.
BUT THAT LAW ISN’T ABOUT WHAT
BOND CONDITION ATTACKERS HAVE.
BUT THAT LAW ISN’T HAPPENING BOND CONDITION ATTACKERS HAVE.
BUT THAT LAW ISN’T HAPPENING BOND CONDITION ATTACKERS HAVE.
BUT THAT LAW ISN’T HAPPENING
NOW.. BOND CONDITION ATTACKERS HAVE.
BUT THAT LAW ISN’T HAPPENING
NOW.. THE BOND CONDITION ATTACKERS HAVE.
BUT THAT LAW ISN’T HAPPENING
NOW.. THE GOVERNOR BUT THAT LAW ISN’T HAPPENING
NOW.. THE GOVERNOR BUT THAT LAW ISN’T HAPPENING
NOW.. THE GOVERNOR
VETOED BUT THAT LAW ISN’T HAPPENING
NOW.. THE GOVERNOR
VETOED IT BUT THAT LAW ISN’T HAPPENING
NOW.. THE GOVERNOR
VETOED IT BECAUSE BUT THAT LAW ISN’T HAPPENING
NOW.. THE GOVERNOR
VETOED IT BECAUSE OF BUT THAT LAW ISN’T HAPPENING
NOW.. THE GOVERNOR
VETOED IT BECAUSE OF AN NOW.. THE GOVERNOR
VETOED IT BECAUSE OF AN NOW.. THE GOVERNOR
VETOED IT BECAUSE OF AN
AMENDMENT NOW.. THE GOVERNOR
VETOED IT BECAUSE OF AN
AMENDMENT DESIGNED NOW.. THE GOVERNOR
VETOED IT BECAUSE OF AN
AMENDMENT DESIGNED TO VETOED IT BECAUSE OF AN
AMENDMENT DESIGNED TO VETOED IT BECAUSE OF AN
AMENDMENT DESIGNED TO
HELP VETOED IT BECAUSE OF AN
AMENDMENT DESIGNED TO
HELP A VETOED IT BECAUSE OF AN
AMENDMENT DESIGNED TO
HELP A RADIOACTIVE VETOED IT BECAUSE OF AN
AMENDMENT DESIGNED TO
HELP A RADIOACTIVE WASTE AMENDMENT DESIGNED TO
HELP A RADIOACTIVE WASTE AMENDMENT DESIGNED TO
HELP A RADIOACTIVE WASTE
DUMPSITE AMENDMENT DESIGNED TO
HELP A RADIOACTIVE WASTE
DUMPSITE SAVE HELP A RADIOACTIVE WASTE
DUMPSITE SAVE HELP A RADIOACTIVE WASTE
DUMPSITE SAVE
MONEY. DUMPSITE SAVE
MONEY. DUMPSITE SAVE
MONEY.
PATTRIK DUMPSITE SAVE
MONEY.
PATTRIK PEREZ DUMPSITE SAVE
MONEY.
PATTRIK PEREZ SPOKE DUMPSITE SAVE
MONEY.
PATTRIK PEREZ SPOKE WITH DUMPSITE SAVE
MONEY.
PATTRIK PEREZ SPOKE WITH A DUMPSITE SAVE
MONEY.
PATTRIK PEREZ SPOKE WITH A GROUP MONEY.
PATTRIK PEREZ SPOKE WITH A GROUP MONEY.
PATTRIK PEREZ SPOKE WITH A GROUP
WHO MONEY.
PATTRIK PEREZ SPOKE WITH A GROUP
WHO WORKED MONEY.
PATTRIK PEREZ SPOKE WITH A GROUP
WHO WORKED ON MONEY.
PATTRIK PEREZ SPOKE WITH A GROUP
WHO WORKED ON THE PATTRIK PEREZ SPOKE WITH A GROUP
WHO WORKED ON THE PATTRIK PEREZ SPOKE WITH A GROUP
WHO WORKED ON THE
BILL PATTRIK PEREZ SPOKE WITH A GROUP
WHO WORKED ON THE
BILL ON PATTRIK PEREZ SPOKE WITH A GROUP
WHO WORKED ON THE
BILL ON BEHALF PATTRIK PEREZ SPOKE WITH A GROUP
WHO WORKED ON THE
BILL ON BEHALF OF PATTRIK PEREZ SPOKE WITH A GROUP
WHO WORKED ON THE
BILL ON BEHALF OF VICTIMS. WHO WORKED ON THE
BILL ON BEHALF OF VICTIMS. BILL ON BEHALF OF VICTIMS. BILL ON BEHALF OF VICTIMS.

MIKE BILL ON BEHALF OF VICTIMS.

MIKE — BILL ON BEHALF OF VICTIMS.

MIKE — THE BILL ON BEHALF OF VICTIMS.

MIKE — THE GOVERNOR BILL ON BEHALF OF VICTIMS.

MIKE — THE GOVERNOR ACTUALLY MIKE — THE GOVERNOR ACTUALLY MIKE — THE GOVERNOR ACTUALLY
PRAISED MIKE — THE GOVERNOR ACTUALLY
PRAISED THE MIKE — THE GOVERNOR ACTUALLY
PRAISED THE
BILL MIKE — THE GOVERNOR ACTUALLY
PRAISED THE
BILL FOR MIKE — THE GOVERNOR ACTUALLY
PRAISED THE
BILL FOR ITS MIKE — THE GOVERNOR ACTUALLY
PRAISED THE
BILL FOR ITS EFFORT MIKE — THE GOVERNOR ACTUALLY
PRAISED THE
BILL FOR ITS EFFORT TO MIKE — THE GOVERNOR ACTUALLY
PRAISED THE
BILL FOR ITS EFFORT TO ADDRESS PRAISED THE
BILL FOR ITS EFFORT TO ADDRESS PRAISED THE
BILL FOR ITS EFFORT TO ADDRESS
DOMESTIC BILL FOR ITS EFFORT TO ADDRESS
DOMESTIC BILL FOR ITS EFFORT TO ADDRESS
DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE. DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE. DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE.
BUT DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE.
BUT BECAUSE DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE.
BUT BECAUSE OF DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE.
BUT BECAUSE OF WHAT DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE.
BUT BECAUSE OF WHAT HE DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE.
BUT BECAUSE OF WHAT HE CALLED DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE.
BUT BECAUSE OF WHAT HE CALLED A VIOLENCE.
BUT BECAUSE OF WHAT HE CALLED A VIOLENCE.
BUT BECAUSE OF WHAT HE CALLED A
“ILL-CONSIDERED VIOLENCE.
BUT BECAUSE OF WHAT HE CALLED A
“ILL-CONSIDERED GIVEAWAY” VIOLENCE.
BUT BECAUSE OF WHAT HE CALLED A
“ILL-CONSIDERED GIVEAWAY” … VIOLENCE.
BUT BECAUSE OF WHAT HE CALLED A
“ILL-CONSIDERED GIVEAWAY” … HE BUT BECAUSE OF WHAT HE CALLED A
“ILL-CONSIDERED GIVEAWAY” … HE BUT BECAUSE OF WHAT HE CALLED A
“ILL-CONSIDERED GIVEAWAY” … HE
DID BUT BECAUSE OF WHAT HE CALLED A
“ILL-CONSIDERED GIVEAWAY” … HE
DID NOT BUT BECAUSE OF WHAT HE CALLED A
“ILL-CONSIDERED GIVEAWAY” … HE
DID NOT GIVE “ILL-CONSIDERED GIVEAWAY” … HE
DID NOT GIVE “ILL-CONSIDERED GIVEAWAY” … HE
DID NOT GIVE
HIS “ILL-CONSIDERED GIVEAWAY” … HE
DID NOT GIVE
HIS MUCH “ILL-CONSIDERED GIVEAWAY” … HE
DID NOT GIVE
HIS MUCH SOUGHT-AFTER “ILL-CONSIDERED GIVEAWAY” … HE
DID NOT GIVE
HIS MUCH SOUGHT-AFTER APPROVAL. DID NOT GIVE
HIS MUCH SOUGHT-AFTER APPROVAL. HIS MUCH SOUGHT-AFTER APPROVAL. HIS MUCH SOUGHT-AFTER APPROVAL.

IT HIS MUCH SOUGHT-AFTER APPROVAL.

IT WAS HIS MUCH SOUGHT-AFTER APPROVAL.

IT WAS NOT HIS MUCH SOUGHT-AFTER APPROVAL.

IT WAS NOT THE HIS MUCH SOUGHT-AFTER APPROVAL.

IT WAS NOT THE OUTCOME HIS MUCH SOUGHT-AFTER APPROVAL.

IT WAS NOT THE OUTCOME THE HIS MUCH SOUGHT-AFTER APPROVAL.

IT WAS NOT THE OUTCOME THE TEXAS IT WAS NOT THE OUTCOME THE TEXAS IT WAS NOT THE OUTCOME THE TEXAS
COUNCIL IT WAS NOT THE OUTCOME THE TEXAS
COUNCIL ON IT WAS NOT THE OUTCOME THE TEXAS
COUNCIL ON FAMILY IT WAS NOT THE OUTCOME THE TEXAS
COUNCIL ON FAMILY
VIOLENCE IT WAS NOT THE OUTCOME THE TEXAS
COUNCIL ON FAMILY
VIOLENCE EXPECTED. COUNCIL ON FAMILY
VIOLENCE EXPECTED. COUNCIL ON FAMILY
VIOLENCE EXPECTED.
“I COUNCIL ON FAMILY
VIOLENCE EXPECTED.
“I WOULD COUNCIL ON FAMILY
VIOLENCE EXPECTED.
“I WOULD BE COUNCIL ON FAMILY
VIOLENCE EXPECTED.
“I WOULD BE REMISS COUNCIL ON FAMILY
VIOLENCE EXPECTED.
“I WOULD BE REMISS IF COUNCIL ON FAMILY
VIOLENCE EXPECTED.
“I WOULD BE REMISS IF I COUNCIL ON FAMILY
VIOLENCE EXPECTED.
“I WOULD BE REMISS IF I DIDN’T VIOLENCE EXPECTED.
“I WOULD BE REMISS IF I DIDN’T VIOLENCE EXPECTED.
“I WOULD BE REMISS IF I DIDN’T
ACKNOWLEDGE VIOLENCE EXPECTED.
“I WOULD BE REMISS IF I DIDN’T
ACKNOWLEDGE THE “I WOULD BE REMISS IF I DIDN’T
ACKNOWLEDGE THE “I WOULD BE REMISS IF I DIDN’T
ACKNOWLEDGE THE
DISAPPOINTMENT.” ACKNOWLEDGE THE
DISAPPOINTMENT.” ACKNOWLEDGE THE
DISAPPOINTMENT.”
ON ACKNOWLEDGE THE
DISAPPOINTMENT.”
ON WEDNESDAY ACKNOWLEDGE THE
DISAPPOINTMENT.”
ON WEDNESDAY — ACKNOWLEDGE THE
DISAPPOINTMENT.”
ON WEDNESDAY — GOVERNOR ACKNOWLEDGE THE
DISAPPOINTMENT.”
ON WEDNESDAY — GOVERNOR GREG DISAPPOINTMENT.”
ON WEDNESDAY — GOVERNOR GREG DISAPPOINTMENT.”
ON WEDNESDAY — GOVERNOR GREG
ABBOTT DISAPPOINTMENT.”
ON WEDNESDAY — GOVERNOR GREG
ABBOTT VETOED DISAPPOINTMENT.”
ON WEDNESDAY — GOVERNOR GREG
ABBOTT VETOED SENATE ON WEDNESDAY — GOVERNOR GREG
ABBOTT VETOED SENATE ON WEDNESDAY — GOVERNOR GREG
ABBOTT VETOED SENATE
BILL ON WEDNESDAY — GOVERNOR GREG
ABBOTT VETOED SENATE
BILL 18-04. ABBOTT VETOED SENATE
BILL 18-04. ABBOTT VETOED SENATE
BILL 18-04.
THE ABBOTT VETOED SENATE
BILL 18-04.
THE BILL ABBOTT VETOED SENATE
BILL 18-04.
THE BILL — ABBOTT VETOED SENATE
BILL 18-04.
THE BILL — BACKED ABBOTT VETOED SENATE
BILL 18-04.
THE BILL — BACKED BY ABBOTT VETOED SENATE
BILL 18-04.
THE BILL — BACKED BY THE BILL 18-04.
THE BILL — BACKED BY THE BILL 18-04.
THE BILL — BACKED BY THE
NONPROFIT BILL 18-04.
THE BILL — BACKED BY THE
NONPROFIT — BILL 18-04.
THE BILL — BACKED BY THE
NONPROFIT — WOULD BILL 18-04.
THE BILL — BACKED BY THE
NONPROFIT — WOULD HAVE THE BILL — BACKED BY THE
NONPROFIT — WOULD HAVE THE BILL — BACKED BY THE
NONPROFIT — WOULD HAVE
UPDATED THE BILL — BACKED BY THE
NONPROFIT — WOULD HAVE
UPDATED LAW THE BILL — BACKED BY THE
NONPROFIT — WOULD HAVE
UPDATED LAW ENFORCEMENT’S NONPROFIT — WOULD HAVE
UPDATED LAW ENFORCEMENT’S NONPROFIT — WOULD HAVE
UPDATED LAW ENFORCEMENT’S
INFORMATION NONPROFIT — WOULD HAVE
UPDATED LAW ENFORCEMENT’S
INFORMATION SYSTEMS NONPROFIT — WOULD HAVE
UPDATED LAW ENFORCEMENT’S
INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO UPDATED LAW ENFORCEMENT’S
INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO UPDATED LAW ENFORCEMENT’S
INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO
INCLUDE UPDATED LAW ENFORCEMENT’S
INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO
INCLUDE A UPDATED LAW ENFORCEMENT’S
INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO
INCLUDE A SUSPECT’S UPDATED LAW ENFORCEMENT’S
INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO
INCLUDE A SUSPECT’S BOND INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO
INCLUDE A SUSPECT’S BOND INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO
INCLUDE A SUSPECT’S BOND
CONDITIONS… INCLUDE A SUSPECT’S BOND
CONDITIONS… INCLUDE A SUSPECT’S BOND
CONDITIONS…
…LIKE INCLUDE A SUSPECT’S BOND
CONDITIONS…
…LIKE HOW INCLUDE A SUSPECT’S BOND
CONDITIONS…
…LIKE HOW FAR INCLUDE A SUSPECT’S BOND
CONDITIONS…
…LIKE HOW FAR THEY INCLUDE A SUSPECT’S BOND
CONDITIONS…
…LIKE HOW FAR THEY MUST INCLUDE A SUSPECT’S BOND
CONDITIONS…
…LIKE HOW FAR THEY MUST STAY CONDITIONS…
…LIKE HOW FAR THEY MUST STAY CONDITIONS…
…LIKE HOW FAR THEY MUST STAY
AWAY CONDITIONS…
…LIKE HOW FAR THEY MUST STAY
AWAY FROM CONDITIONS…
…LIKE HOW FAR THEY MUST STAY
AWAY FROM A CONDITIONS…
…LIKE HOW FAR THEY MUST STAY
AWAY FROM A VICTIM. …LIKE HOW FAR THEY MUST STAY
AWAY FROM A VICTIM. …LIKE HOW FAR THEY MUST STAY
AWAY FROM A VICTIM.
“IT …LIKE HOW FAR THEY MUST STAY
AWAY FROM A VICTIM.
“IT LEAVES …LIKE HOW FAR THEY MUST STAY
AWAY FROM A VICTIM.
“IT LEAVES LAW …LIKE HOW FAR THEY MUST STAY
AWAY FROM A VICTIM.
“IT LEAVES LAW ENFORCEMENT …LIKE HOW FAR THEY MUST STAY
AWAY FROM A VICTIM.
“IT LEAVES LAW ENFORCEMENT AND AWAY FROM A VICTIM.
“IT LEAVES LAW ENFORCEMENT AND AWAY FROM A VICTIM.
“IT LEAVES LAW ENFORCEMENT AND
SURVIVORS AWAY FROM A VICTIM.
“IT LEAVES LAW ENFORCEMENT AND
SURVIVORS VULNERABLE “IT LEAVES LAW ENFORCEMENT AND
SURVIVORS VULNERABLE “IT LEAVES LAW ENFORCEMENT AND
SURVIVORS VULNERABLE
BECAUSE “IT LEAVES LAW ENFORCEMENT AND
SURVIVORS VULNERABLE
BECAUSE THEY “IT LEAVES LAW ENFORCEMENT AND
SURVIVORS VULNERABLE
BECAUSE THEY DON’T “IT LEAVES LAW ENFORCEMENT AND
SURVIVORS VULNERABLE
BECAUSE THEY DON’T KNOW “IT LEAVES LAW ENFORCEMENT AND
SURVIVORS VULNERABLE
BECAUSE THEY DON’T KNOW WHAT, “IT LEAVES LAW ENFORCEMENT AND
SURVIVORS VULNERABLE
BECAUSE THEY DON’T KNOW WHAT, IN SURVIVORS VULNERABLE
BECAUSE THEY DON’T KNOW WHAT, IN SURVIVORS VULNERABLE
BECAUSE THEY DON’T KNOW WHAT, IN
PARTICULARLY SURVIVORS VULNERABLE
BECAUSE THEY DON’T KNOW WHAT, IN
PARTICULARLY HIGH-RISK BECAUSE THEY DON’T KNOW WHAT, IN
PARTICULARLY HIGH-RISK BECAUSE THEY DON’T KNOW WHAT, IN
PARTICULARLY HIGH-RISK
SITUATIONS, BECAUSE THEY DON’T KNOW WHAT, IN
PARTICULARLY HIGH-RISK
SITUATIONS, THOSE BECAUSE THEY DON’T KNOW WHAT, IN
PARTICULARLY HIGH-RISK
SITUATIONS, THOSE CONDITIONS PARTICULARLY HIGH-RISK
SITUATIONS, THOSE CONDITIONS PARTICULARLY HIGH-RISK
SITUATIONS, THOSE CONDITIONS
ARE.” SITUATIONS, THOSE CONDITIONS
ARE.” SITUATIONS, THOSE CONDITIONS
ARE.”
A SITUATIONS, THOSE CONDITIONS
ARE.”
A NEARLY SITUATIONS, THOSE CONDITIONS
ARE.”
A NEARLY FOUR-YEAR SITUATIONS, THOSE CONDITIONS
ARE.”
A NEARLY FOUR-YEAR EFFORT SITUATIONS, THOSE CONDITIONS
ARE.”
A NEARLY FOUR-YEAR EFFORT — ARE.”
A NEARLY FOUR-YEAR EFFORT — ARE.”
A NEARLY FOUR-YEAR EFFORT —
DERAILED ARE.”
A NEARLY FOUR-YEAR EFFORT —
DERAILED BY ARE.”
A NEARLY FOUR-YEAR EFFORT —
DERAILED BY A A NEARLY FOUR-YEAR EFFORT —
DERAILED BY A A NEARLY FOUR-YEAR EFFORT —
DERAILED BY A
LAST-MINUTE A NEARLY FOUR-YEAR EFFORT —
DERAILED BY A
LAST-MINUTE AMENDMENT A NEARLY FOUR-YEAR EFFORT —
DERAILED BY A
LAST-MINUTE AMENDMENT FROM A NEARLY FOUR-YEAR EFFORT —
DERAILED BY A
LAST-MINUTE AMENDMENT FROM STATE DERAILED BY A
LAST-MINUTE AMENDMENT FROM STATE DERAILED BY A
LAST-MINUTE AMENDMENT FROM STATE
REP. DERAILED BY A
LAST-MINUTE AMENDMENT FROM STATE
REP. PONCHO LAST-MINUTE AMENDMENT FROM STATE
REP. PONCHO LAST-MINUTE AMENDMENT FROM STATE
REP. PONCHO
NEVAREZ LAST-MINUTE AMENDMENT FROM STATE
REP. PONCHO
NEVAREZ — LAST-MINUTE AMENDMENT FROM STATE
REP. PONCHO
NEVAREZ — OF LAST-MINUTE AMENDMENT FROM STATE
REP. PONCHO
NEVAREZ — OF EAGLE LAST-MINUTE AMENDMENT FROM STATE
REP. PONCHO
NEVAREZ — OF EAGLE PASS. REP. PONCHO
NEVAREZ — OF EAGLE PASS. REP. PONCHO
NEVAREZ — OF EAGLE PASS.
THE REP. PONCHO
NEVAREZ — OF EAGLE PASS.
THE AMENDMENT REP. PONCHO
NEVAREZ — OF EAGLE PASS.
THE AMENDMENT WOULD REP. PONCHO
NEVAREZ — OF EAGLE PASS.
THE AMENDMENT WOULD HAVE REP. PONCHO
NEVAREZ — OF EAGLE PASS.
THE AMENDMENT WOULD HAVE DELAYED NEVAREZ — OF EAGLE PASS.
THE AMENDMENT WOULD HAVE DELAYED NEVAREZ — OF EAGLE PASS.
THE AMENDMENT WOULD HAVE DELAYED
A THE AMENDMENT WOULD HAVE DELAYED
A THE AMENDMENT WOULD HAVE DELAYED
A
SURCHARGE THE AMENDMENT WOULD HAVE DELAYED
A
SURCHARGE AND THE AMENDMENT WOULD HAVE DELAYED
A
SURCHARGE AND FEE THE AMENDMENT WOULD HAVE DELAYED
A
SURCHARGE AND FEE INCREASE THE AMENDMENT WOULD HAVE DELAYED
A
SURCHARGE AND FEE INCREASE FOR THE AMENDMENT WOULD HAVE DELAYED
A
SURCHARGE AND FEE INCREASE FOR A A
SURCHARGE AND FEE INCREASE FOR A A
SURCHARGE AND FEE INCREASE FOR A
RADIOACTIVE SURCHARGE AND FEE INCREASE FOR A
RADIOACTIVE SURCHARGE AND FEE INCREASE FOR A
RADIOACTIVE
WASTE SURCHARGE AND FEE INCREASE FOR A
RADIOACTIVE
WASTE FACILITY SURCHARGE AND FEE INCREASE FOR A
RADIOACTIVE
WASTE FACILITY IN SURCHARGE AND FEE INCREASE FOR A
RADIOACTIVE
WASTE FACILITY IN WEST SURCHARGE AND FEE INCREASE FOR A
RADIOACTIVE
WASTE FACILITY IN WEST TEXAS.- RADIOACTIVE
WASTE FACILITY IN WEST TEXAS.- RADIOACTIVE
WASTE FACILITY IN WEST TEXAS.-
SOMETHING RADIOACTIVE
WASTE FACILITY IN WEST TEXAS.-
SOMETHING TOTALLY WASTE FACILITY IN WEST TEXAS.-
SOMETHING TOTALLY WASTE FACILITY IN WEST TEXAS.-
SOMETHING TOTALLY
UNRELATED WASTE FACILITY IN WEST TEXAS.-
SOMETHING TOTALLY
UNRELATED TO WASTE FACILITY IN WEST TEXAS.-
SOMETHING TOTALLY
UNRELATED TO THE WASTE FACILITY IN WEST TEXAS.-
SOMETHING TOTALLY
UNRELATED TO THE DOMESTIC SOMETHING TOTALLY
UNRELATED TO THE DOMESTIC SOMETHING TOTALLY
UNRELATED TO THE DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE SOMETHING TOTALLY
UNRELATED TO THE DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE BILL. UNRELATED TO THE DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE BILL. UNRELATED TO THE DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE BILL.
IN UNRELATED TO THE DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE BILL.
IN HIS UNRELATED TO THE DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE BILL.
IN HIS VETO UNRELATED TO THE DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE BILL.
IN HIS VETO PROCLAMATION UNRELATED TO THE DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE BILL.
IN HIS VETO PROCLAMATION — VIOLENCE BILL.
IN HIS VETO PROCLAMATION — VIOLENCE BILL.
IN HIS VETO PROCLAMATION —
GOVERNOR VIOLENCE BILL.
IN HIS VETO PROCLAMATION —
GOVERNOR ABBOTT VIOLENCE BILL.
IN HIS VETO PROCLAMATION —
GOVERNOR ABBOTT CALLED IN HIS VETO PROCLAMATION —
GOVERNOR ABBOTT CALLED IN HIS VETO PROCLAMATION —
GOVERNOR ABBOTT CALLED
THE IN HIS VETO PROCLAMATION —
GOVERNOR ABBOTT CALLED
THE MOVE IN HIS VETO PROCLAMATION —
GOVERNOR ABBOTT CALLED
THE MOVE AN IN HIS VETO PROCLAMATION —
GOVERNOR ABBOTT CALLED
THE MOVE AN “ILL- IN HIS VETO PROCLAMATION —
GOVERNOR ABBOTT CALLED
THE MOVE AN “ILL- CONSIDERED GOVERNOR ABBOTT CALLED
THE MOVE AN “ILL- CONSIDERED GOVERNOR ABBOTT CALLED
THE MOVE AN “ILL- CONSIDERED
GIVEAWAY.” THE MOVE AN “ILL- CONSIDERED
GIVEAWAY.” THE MOVE AN “ILL- CONSIDERED
GIVEAWAY.”
A THE MOVE AN “ILL- CONSIDERED
GIVEAWAY.”
A MOVE THE MOVE AN “ILL- CONSIDERED
GIVEAWAY.”
A MOVE THAT THE MOVE AN “ILL- CONSIDERED
GIVEAWAY.”
A MOVE THAT ADVOCATES THE MOVE AN “ILL- CONSIDERED
GIVEAWAY.”
A MOVE THAT ADVOCATES SAY THE MOVE AN “ILL- CONSIDERED
GIVEAWAY.”
A MOVE THAT ADVOCATES SAY SENT THE MOVE AN “ILL- CONSIDERED
GIVEAWAY.”
A MOVE THAT ADVOCATES SAY SENT A GIVEAWAY.”
A MOVE THAT ADVOCATES SAY SENT A GIVEAWAY.”
A MOVE THAT ADVOCATES SAY SENT A
BLOW GIVEAWAY.”
A MOVE THAT ADVOCATES SAY SENT A
BLOW TO GIVEAWAY.”
A MOVE THAT ADVOCATES SAY SENT A
BLOW TO THE GIVEAWAY.”
A MOVE THAT ADVOCATES SAY SENT A
BLOW TO THE DOMESTIC A MOVE THAT ADVOCATES SAY SENT A
BLOW TO THE DOMESTIC A MOVE THAT ADVOCATES SAY SENT A
BLOW TO THE DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE A MOVE THAT ADVOCATES SAY SENT A
BLOW TO THE DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE COMMUNITY. BLOW TO THE DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE COMMUNITY. BLOW TO THE DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE COMMUNITY.
“THE BLOW TO THE DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE COMMUNITY.
“THE SAME BLOW TO THE DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE COMMUNITY.
“THE SAME PROBLEM BLOW TO THE DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE COMMUNITY.
“THE SAME PROBLEM THAT BLOW TO THE DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE COMMUNITY.
“THE SAME PROBLEM THAT WAS BLOW TO THE DOMESTIC
VIOLENCE COMMUNITY.
“THE SAME PROBLEM THAT WAS A VIOLENCE COMMUNITY.
“THE SAME PROBLEM THAT WAS A VIOLENCE COMMUNITY.
“THE SAME PROBLEM THAT WAS A
PROBLEM VIOLENCE COMMUNITY.
“THE SAME PROBLEM THAT WAS A
PROBLEM YESTERDAY “THE SAME PROBLEM THAT WAS A
PROBLEM YESTERDAY “THE SAME PROBLEM THAT WAS A
PROBLEM YESTERDAY
CONTINUES “THE SAME PROBLEM THAT WAS A
PROBLEM YESTERDAY
CONTINUES TOMORROW “THE SAME PROBLEM THAT WAS A
PROBLEM YESTERDAY
CONTINUES TOMORROW AND “THE SAME PROBLEM THAT WAS A
PROBLEM YESTERDAY
CONTINUES TOMORROW AND MOVING PROBLEM YESTERDAY
CONTINUES TOMORROW AND MOVING PROBLEM YESTERDAY
CONTINUES TOMORROW AND MOVING
FORWARD.” CONTINUES TOMORROW AND MOVING
FORWARD.” CONTINUES TOMORROW AND MOVING
FORWARD.”
MOVING CONTINUES TOMORROW AND MOVING
FORWARD.”
MOVING FORWARD CONTINUES TOMORROW AND MOVING
FORWARD.”
MOVING FORWARD WHILE CONTINUES TOMORROW AND MOVING
FORWARD.”
MOVING FORWARD WHILE VICTIMS CONTINUES TOMORROW AND MOVING
FORWARD.”
MOVING FORWARD WHILE VICTIMS — FORWARD.”
MOVING FORWARD WHILE VICTIMS — FORWARD.”
MOVING FORWARD WHILE VICTIMS —
AND FORWARD.”
MOVING FORWARD WHILE VICTIMS —
AND LAW MOVING FORWARD WHILE VICTIMS —
AND LAW MOVING FORWARD WHILE VICTIMS —
AND LAW
ENFORCEMENT MOVING FORWARD WHILE VICTIMS —
AND LAW
ENFORCEMENT — MOVING FORWARD WHILE VICTIMS —
AND LAW
ENFORCEMENT — REMAIN MOVING FORWARD WHILE VICTIMS —
AND LAW
ENFORCEMENT — REMAIN AT MOVING FORWARD WHILE VICTIMS —
AND LAW
ENFORCEMENT — REMAIN AT RISK. AND LAW
ENFORCEMENT — REMAIN AT RISK. AND LAW
ENFORCEMENT — REMAIN AT RISK.
“OUR AND LAW
ENFORCEMENT — REMAIN AT RISK.
“OUR DISAPPOINTMENT AND LAW
ENFORCEMENT — REMAIN AT RISK.
“OUR DISAPPOINTMENT GOES AND LAW
ENFORCEMENT — REMAIN AT RISK.
“OUR DISAPPOINTMENT GOES DEEP AND LAW
ENFORCEMENT — REMAIN AT RISK.
“OUR DISAPPOINTMENT GOES DEEP IN ENFORCEMENT — REMAIN AT RISK.
“OUR DISAPPOINTMENT GOES DEEP IN ENFORCEMENT — REMAIN AT RISK.
“OUR DISAPPOINTMENT GOES DEEP IN
THAT ENFORCEMENT — REMAIN AT RISK.
“OUR DISAPPOINTMENT GOES DEEP IN
THAT WE ENFORCEMENT — REMAIN AT RISK.
“OUR DISAPPOINTMENT GOES DEEP IN
THAT WE WEREN’T ENFORCEMENT — REMAIN AT RISK.
“OUR DISAPPOINTMENT GOES DEEP IN
THAT WE WEREN’T ABLE “OUR DISAPPOINTMENT GOES DEEP IN
THAT WE WEREN’T ABLE “OUR DISAPPOINTMENT GOES DEEP IN
THAT WE WEREN’T ABLE
TO “OUR DISAPPOINTMENT GOES DEEP IN
THAT WE WEREN’T ABLE
TO MAKE “OUR DISAPPOINTMENT GOES DEEP IN
THAT WE WEREN’T ABLE
TO MAKE THIS “OUR DISAPPOINTMENT GOES DEEP IN
THAT WE WEREN’T ABLE
TO MAKE THIS PROTECTION THAT WE WEREN’T ABLE
TO MAKE THIS PROTECTION THAT WE WEREN’T ABLE
TO MAKE THIS PROTECTION
AVAILABLE, THAT WE WEREN’T ABLE
TO MAKE THIS PROTECTION
AVAILABLE, BUT THAT WE WEREN’T ABLE
TO MAKE THIS PROTECTION
AVAILABLE, BUT IT’S THAT WE WEREN’T ABLE
TO MAKE THIS PROTECTION
AVAILABLE, BUT IT’S ONLY THAT WE WEREN’T ABLE
TO MAKE THIS PROTECTION
AVAILABLE, BUT IT’S ONLY A THAT WE WEREN’T ABLE
TO MAKE THIS PROTECTION
AVAILABLE, BUT IT’S ONLY A MINOR TO MAKE THIS PROTECTION
AVAILABLE, BUT IT’S ONLY A MINOR TO MAKE THIS PROTECTION
AVAILABLE, BUT IT’S ONLY A MINOR
SETBACK. TO MAKE THIS PROTECTION
AVAILABLE, BUT IT’S ONLY A MINOR
SETBACK. WE TO MAKE THIS PROTECTION
AVAILABLE, BUT IT’S ONLY A MINOR
SETBACK. WE WILL TO MAKE THIS PROTECTION
AVAILABLE, BUT IT’S ONLY A MINOR
SETBACK. WE WILL BE TO MAKE THIS PROTECTION
AVAILABLE, BUT IT’S ONLY A MINOR
SETBACK. WE WILL BE BACK.” AVAILABLE, BUT IT’S ONLY A MINOR
SETBACK. WE WILL BE BACK.” SETBACK. WE WILL BE BACK.” ALL ALL SIX ALL SIX OF ALL SIX OF THE ALL SIX OF THE STATE ALL SIX OF THE STATE
REPRESENTATIVES ALL SIX OF THE STATE
REPRESENTATIVES IN ALL SIX OF THE STATE
REPRESENTATIVES IN THE ALL SIX OF THE STATE
REPRESENTATIVES IN THE
AUSTIN ALL SIX OF THE STATE
REPRESENTATIVES IN THE
AUSTIN AREA ALL SIX OF THE STATE
REPRESENTATIVES IN THE
AUSTIN AREA VOTED ALL SIX OF THE STATE
REPRESENTATIVES IN THE
AUSTIN AREA VOTED IN ALL SIX OF THE STATE
REPRESENTATIVES IN THE
AUSTIN AREA VOTED IN FAVOR ALL SIX OF THE STATE
REPRESENTATIVES IN THE
AUSTIN AREA VOTED IN FAVOR OF REPRESENTATIVES IN THE
AUSTIN AREA VOTED IN FAVOR OF REPRESENTATIVES IN THE
AUSTIN AREA VOTED IN FAVOR OF
THE REPRESENTATIVES IN THE
AUSTIN AREA VOTED IN FAVOR OF
THE BILL REPRESENTATIVES IN THE
AUSTIN AREA VOTED IN FAVOR OF
THE BILL THAT REPRESENTATIVES IN THE
AUSTIN AREA VOTED IN FAVOR OF
THE BILL THAT INCLUDED AUSTIN AREA VOTED IN FAVOR OF
THE BILL THAT INCLUDED AUSTIN AREA VOTED IN FAVOR OF
THE BILL THAT INCLUDED
THAT AUSTIN AREA VOTED IN FAVOR OF
THE BILL THAT INCLUDED
THAT LAST-MINUTE AUSTIN AREA VOTED IN FAVOR OF
THE BILL THAT INCLUDED
THAT LAST-MINUTE AMENDMENT. AUSTIN AREA VOTED IN FAVOR OF
THE BILL THAT INCLUDED
THAT LAST-MINUTE AMENDMENT. TWO THE BILL THAT INCLUDED
THAT LAST-MINUTE AMENDMENT. TWO THE BILL THAT INCLUDED
THAT LAST-MINUTE AMENDMENT. TWO
OUT THE BILL THAT INCLUDED
THAT LAST-MINUTE AMENDMENT. TWO
OUT OF THE BILL THAT INCLUDED
THAT LAST-MINUTE AMENDMENT. TWO
OUT OF THE THE BILL THAT INCLUDED
THAT LAST-MINUTE AMENDMENT. TWO
OUT OF THE FOUR THE BILL THAT INCLUDED
THAT LAST-MINUTE AMENDMENT. TWO
OUT OF THE FOUR AREA THE BILL THAT INCLUDED
THAT LAST-MINUTE AMENDMENT. TWO
OUT OF THE FOUR AREA STATE THAT LAST-MINUTE AMENDMENT. TWO
OUT OF THE FOUR AREA STATE THAT LAST-MINUTE AMENDMENT. TWO
OUT OF THE FOUR AREA STATE
SENATORS THAT LAST-MINUTE AMENDMENT. TWO
OUT OF THE FOUR AREA STATE
SENATORS ALSO OUT OF THE FOUR AREA STATE
SENATORS ALSO OUT OF THE FOUR AREA STATE
SENATORS ALSO
VOTED OUT OF THE FOUR AREA STATE
SENATORS ALSO
VOTED IN OUT OF THE FOUR AREA STATE
SENATORS ALSO
VOTED IN FAVOR. SENATORS ALSO
VOTED IN FAVOR. SENATORS ALSO
VOTED IN FAVOR.
WE SENATORS ALSO
VOTED IN FAVOR.
WE REACHED SENATORS ALSO
VOTED IN FAVOR.
WE REACHED OUT SENATORS ALSO
VOTED IN FAVOR.
WE REACHED OUT TO SENATORS ALSO
VOTED IN FAVOR.
WE REACHED OUT TO NEVAREZ’S VOTED IN FAVOR.
WE REACHED OUT TO NEVAREZ’S VOTED IN FAVOR.
WE REACHED OUT TO NEVAREZ’S
OFFICE VOTED IN FAVOR.
WE REACHED OUT TO NEVAREZ’S
OFFICE TO VOTED IN FAVOR.
WE REACHED OUT TO NEVAREZ’S
OFFICE TO ASK WE REACHED OUT TO NEVAREZ’S
OFFICE TO ASK WE REACHED OUT TO NEVAREZ’S
OFFICE TO ASK
WHY WE REACHED OUT TO NEVAREZ’S
OFFICE TO ASK
WHY HE WE REACHED OUT TO NEVAREZ’S
OFFICE TO ASK
WHY HE INCLUDED WE REACHED OUT TO NEVAREZ’S
OFFICE TO ASK
WHY HE INCLUDED THAT WE REACHED OUT TO NEVAREZ’S
OFFICE TO ASK
WHY HE INCLUDED THAT AMENDMENT OFFICE TO ASK
WHY HE INCLUDED THAT AMENDMENT OFFICE TO ASK
WHY HE INCLUDED THAT AMENDMENT
— OFFICE TO ASK
WHY HE INCLUDED THAT AMENDMENT
— BUT OFFICE TO ASK
WHY HE INCLUDED THAT AMENDMENT
— BUT HAVEN’T WHY HE INCLUDED THAT AMENDMENT
— BUT HAVEN’T WHY HE INCLUDED THAT AMENDMENT
— BUT HAVEN’T
HEARD WHY HE INCLUDED THAT AMENDMENT
— BUT HAVEN’T
HEARD BACK. — BUT HAVEN’T
HEARD BACK. — BUT HAVEN’T
HEARD BACK.
IN — BUT HAVEN’T
HEARD BACK.
IN THE — BUT HAVEN’T
HEARD BACK.
IN THE STUDIO, — BUT HAVEN’T
HEARD BACK.
IN THE STUDIO, PATTRIK — BUT HAVEN’T
HEARD BACK.
IN THE STUDIO, PATTRIK PEREZ, HEARD BACK.
IN THE STUDIO, PATTRIK PEREZ, HEARD BACK.
IN THE STUDIO, PATTRIK PEREZ,
KVUE HEARD BACK.
IN THE STUDIO, PATTRIK PEREZ,
KVUE NEWS. IN THE STUDIO, PATTRIK PEREZ,
KVUE NEWS. KVUE NEWS.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *