The Anti-Federalist Papers | Cato 5
Articles,  Blog

The Anti-Federalist Papers | Cato 5

To the Citizens of the State of New York, In my last number I endeavored to prove that
the language of the article relative to the establishment of the executive of this new
government was vague and inexplicit, that the great powers of the President, connected
with his duration in office would lead to oppression and ruin. That he would be governed by favorites and
flatterers, or that a dangerous council would be collected from the great officers of state;—that
the ten miles square, if the remarks of one of the wisest men, drawn from the experience
of mankind, may be credited, would be the asylum of the base, idle, avaricious and ambitious,
and that the court would possess a language and manners different from yours; that a vice
president is as unnecessary, as he is dangerous in his influence–that the president cannot
represent you because he is not of your own immediate choice, that if you adopt this government,
you will incline to an arbitrary and odious aristocracy or monarchy the that the president
possessed of the power, given him by this frame of government differs but very immaterially
from the establishment of monarchy in Great-Britain, and I warned you to beware of the fallacious
resemblance that is held out to you by the advocates of this new system between it and
your own state governments. And here I cannot help remarking, that inexplicitness
seems to pervade this whole political fabric: certainty in political compacts, which Mr.
Coke calls the mother and nurse of repose and quietness, the want of which induced men
to engage in political society, has ever been held by a wise and free people as essential
to their security; as, on the one hand it fixes barriers which the ambitious and tyrannically
disposed magistrate dare not overleap, and on the other, becomes a wall of safety to
the community–otherwise stipulations between the governors and governed are nugatory; and
you might as well deposit the important powers of legislation and execution in one or a few
and permit them to govern according to their disposition and will; but the world is too
full of examples, which prove that to live by one man’s will became the cause of all
men’s misery. Before the existence of express political
compacts it was reasonably implied that the magistrate should govern with wisdom and Justice,
but mere implication was too feeble to restrain the unbridled ambition of a bad man, or afford
security against negligence, cruelty, or any other defect of mind. It is alledged that the opinions and manners
of the people of America, are capable to resist and prevent an extension of prerogative or
oppression; but you must recollect that opinion and manners are mutable, and may not always
be a permanent obstruction against the encroachments of government; that the progress of a commercial
society begets luxury, the parent of inequality, the foe to virtue, and the enemy to restraint;
and that ambition and voluptuousness aided by flattery, will teach magistrates, where
limits are not explicitly fixed to have separate and distinct interests from the people, besides
it will not be denied that government assimilates the manners and opinions of the community
to it. Therefore, a general presumption that rulers
will govern well is not a sufficient security.–You are then under a sacred obligation to provide
for the safety of your posterity, and would you now basely desert their interests, when
by a small share of prudence you may transmit to them a beautiful political patrimony, that
will prevent the necessity of their travelling through seas of blood to obtain that, which
your wisdom might have secured:–It is a duty you owe likewise to your own reputation,
for you have a great name to lose; you are characterised as cautious, prudent and jealous
in politics; whence is it therefore, that you are about to precipitate yourselves into
a sea of uncertainty, and adopt a system so vague, and which has discarded so many of
your valuable rights.–Is it because you do not believe that an American can be a tyrant? If this be the case you rest on a weak basis;
Americans are like other men in similar situations, when the manners and opinions of the community
are changed by the causes I mentioned before, and your political compact inexplicit, your
posterity will find that great power connected with ambition, luxury, and flattery, will
as readily produce a Caesar, Caligula, Nero, and Domitian in America, as the same causes
did in the Roman empire. But the next thing to be considered in conformity
to my plan, is the first article of this new government, which comprises the erection of
the house of representatives and senate, and prescribes their various powers and objects
of legislation. The most general objections to the first article,
are that biennial elections for representatives are a departure from the safe democratical
principles of annual ones–that the number of representatives are too few; that the apportionment
and principles of increase are unjust; that no attention has been paid to either the numbers
or property in each state in forming the senate; that the mode in which they are appointed
and their duration, will lead to the establishment of an aristocracy; that the senate and president
are improperly connected, both as to appointments, and the making of treaties, which are to become
the supreme law of the land; that the judicial in some measure, to wit, as to the trial of
impeachments, is placed in the senate, a branch of the legislative, and some times a branch
of the executive: that Congress have the improper power of making or altering the regulations
prescribed by the different legislatures, respecting the time, place, and manner of
holding elections for representatives, and the time and manner of choosing senators;
that standing armies may be established, and appropriation of money made for their support
for two years; that the militia of the most remote state may be marched into those states
situated at the opposite extreme of this continent; that the slave trade is, to all intents and
purposes permanently established; and a slavish capitation, or poll-tax, may at any time be
levied–these are some of the many evils that will attend the adoption of this government. But with respect to the first objection, it
may be remarked that a well digested democracy has this advantage over all others, to wit,
that it affords to many the opportunity to be advanced to the supreme command, and the
honors they thereby enjoy fill them with a desire of rendering themselves worthy of them;
hence this desire becomes part of their education, is matured m manhood, and produces an ardent
affection for their country, and it is the opinion of the great Sidney, and Montesquieu
that this is in a great measure produced by annual election of magistrates. If annual elections were to exist in this
government, and learning and information to become more prevalent, you never will want
men to execute whatever you could design–Sidney observes that a well governed state is as
fruitful to all good purposes as the seven headed serpent is said to have been in evil;
when one head is cut off, many rise up in the place of it. He remarks further, that it was also thought,
that free cities by frequent elections of magistrates became nurseries of great and
able men, every man endeavoring to excel others, that he might be advanced to the honor he
had no other title to, than what might arise from his merit, or reputation, but the framers
of this perfect government, as it is called, have departed from this democratical principle,
and established bi-ennial elections for the house of representatives, who are to be chosen
by the people, and sextennial for the senate, who are to be chosen by the legislatures of
the different states, and have given to the executive the unprecedented power of making
temporary senators, in case of vacancies, by resignation or otherwise, and so far forth
establishing a precedent for virtual representation (though in fact their original appointment
is virtual) thereby influencing the choice of the legislatures, or if they should not
be so complaisant as to conform to his appointment–offence will be given to the executive and the temporary
members will appear ridiculous by rejection; this temporary member, during his time of
appointment, will of course act by a power derived from the executive, and for, and under
his immediate influence. It is a very important objection to this government,
that the representation consists of so few; too few to resist the influence of corruption,
and the temptation to treachery, against which all governments ought to take precautions–how
guarded you have been on this head, in your own state constitution, and yet the number
of senators and representatives proposed for this vast continent, does not equal those
of your own state; how great the disparity, if you compare them with the aggregate numbers
in the United States. The history of representation in England,
from which we have taken our model of legislation, is briefly this: before the institution of
legislating by deputies, the whole free part of the community usually met for that purpose;
when this became impossible by the increase of numbers the community was divided into
districts, from each of which was sent such a number of deputies as was a complete representation
of the various numbers and orders of citizens within them; but can it be asserted with truth,
that six men can be a complete and full representation of the numbers and various orders of the people
in this state? Another thing [that] may be suggested against
the small number of representatives is, that but few of you will have the chance of sharing
even in this branch of the legislature; and that the choice will be confined to a very
few; the more complete it is, the better will your interests be preserved, and the greater
the opportunity you will have to participate in government, one of the principal securities
of a free people; but this subject has been so ably and fully treated by a writer under
the signature of Brutus, that I shall content myself with referring you to him thereon,
reserving further observations on the other objections I have mentioned, for my future
numbers. CATO

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *