The Meaning and Reality of Individual Sovereignty
Articles,  Blog

The Meaning and Reality of Individual Sovereignty


Good evening, ladies and gentlemen, my name is David Theroux, and I’m the president of the independent Institute We’re especially delighted to welcome you to this Evening our special program is entitled the meaning and reality of individual sovereignty with a renowned scholar and best-selling author Jordan B. Peterson For those of you who may be new to the independent Institute, you’ll find information on us in the printed program that hopefully you received The independent Institute is a nonprofit nonpartisan public policy research organization that sponsors in-depth studies of major social and economic issues The purpose is to bowl the advance peaceful prosperous and free societies grounded in a commitment to human dignity In the process we seek robust dialogue of key issues and we stand against efforts to shut down the free exchange of ideas The results of our work are published as books and form the basis for numerous conference and media programs Neither seeking nor accepting government funding. We hope that you will join our lighthouse society Within just a couple years Jordan Peterson has taken the world by storm Indeed he’s become a profound and powerful phenomenon in the midst of the cultural confusion of our age a A courageous articulate and sparkling champion of free speech individual liberty personal responsibility Free markets civic virtue the rule of law and the judeo-christian values that underpin Western civilization Dr. Peterson has burst onto the public scene with his incisive critiques of political correctness identity politics moral relativism post-modernism and collectivism and statism on the left and right Here’s just a sampling of the many memorable quotes by him quote Don’t compare yourself with other people compare yourself with who you were yesterday unquote or Free speech is not just another value is the foundation of Western civilization Don’t lie about ANYTHING, EVER. lying leads to hell We have to rediscover the eternal values that… and then live them out No one gets away with anything ever So take responsibility for your own life Now what is remarkable is that such common sense and enduring wisdom Has been so sadly lacking in the public square But what is also so astounding and encouraging is the enormous interest Dr. Peterson is generating globally in restoring first principles Author the number 1 international bestseller 12 rules for life an antidote to chaos Jordan Peterson is professor of psychology at the University of Toronto He is also author of the book maps of meaning the architecture of belief Plus over 100 scientific papers and he has almost 2 million subscribers to his YouTube channel His work explores the modern world by combining the hard-won truths of ancient tradition With the stunning revelations of cutting-edge science now you can read further details about his background on the program that hopefully you got But I will just add one additional note He’s a native of North Western Canada (in) 2016 he was inducted as an honorary member of the quack-e-to-tell tribe in the Pacific Northwest and given the name alestalagie meaning great seeker Please join me in welcoming Jordan B Peterson Well, thank you all for coming. it’s good to see you here The meaning and reality of individual sovereignty That’s a fundamental question as far as I’m concerned Because it’s by no means self-evident Why? the idea of individual sovereignty should be granted the primacy of place that it Has been granted or you could say it another way the The reasons that that proposition have been deemed self-evident are not obvious so When I was just backstage, I was looking at the Declaration of Independence, which I do quite regularly make sure that I’ve got that especially the introductory Statements formulated properly and the introductory statements. I won’t quote them precisely but They lay out a series of propositions And the first is that we hold these truths to be self-evident and that people are endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights that they’re equal and that Government is to govern bike by the consent of individuals and Those are axiomatic statements, right? There are this sort of statements that you build a system from you have to accept the statements first before you can build the system And it’s analogous in some sense to Euclidean geometry, right? There’s a Set of axioms and you accept them and then you can build a system, but you have to accept the axioms But you don’t have to accept the axioms. That’s the thing and one of the things that’s very much worth understanding is that the current culture war that we’re Embroiled in which really has been going on for in some ways For thousands of years, but in other ways for More specifically political ways. I suppose since the rise of Marxism about a hundred and fifty years ago It depends on how you analyze it whether you think about it as political or psychological because as a psychological phenomena, it’s much older The the proposition that Those truths that are laid out in the Declaration of Independence are self-evident is No longer accepted by a large number of people Let’s say in the intellectual academy and I would say that’s particularly true of the post modernists. It’s also true of the Marxists and the post modernists and the Marxists have United in a very strange manner because their Philosophies are not really commensurate with one another the post modernists profess Skepticism about meta-narratives large-scale stories that perhaps might Might serve as uniting structures for people’s own cognitive Contents but also that unite groups of people across large swaths of territory they profess skepticism about the validity of those narratives and yet well, the problem with that is it leaves you nowhere because if you don’t have a Uniting narrative a uniting story of uniting ethos. You don’t have an explanation for Your existence in the world and you don’t have a direction And that’s not helpful Because you can’t live without an explanation for your existence in the world and a direction or if you do live under those conditions You’re bound to be miserable. And the reason you’re bound to be miserable is because And I would say that this is technically true That almost all the positive emotion that you’re going to experience in your life is a consequence of pursuing valuable goals It’s not a consequence of attaining them It’s a consequence of positing them aiming at them and then observing yourself moving towards them and that… the sense that accompanies that and we know the neurobiology of this sense actually quite well. the sense of that is one of Forward movement and engagement and meaning and accomplishment. It’s something like that Hope that’s another way of thinking about it. And it’s the antidote in some sense to the flip side of life which is the fact that it’s nasty brutish and short as Thomas Hobbes put it And that’s inalienable as well there’s no escape from the limitations and suffering of life And so in order for that not to become overwhelming and then that can easily become overwhelming and often does in people’s lives Then you need a countervailing Set of propositions that you can act out and embody to endow that- Limitation with worth and that’s a not a trivial Problem. I was just debating… Not really Slavoj Žižek about a week ago and two weeks ago maybe and I was debating him because he had been advertised to me and many others as sort of the world’s foremost Marxist scholar and it turned out that He really was not much of a Marxist at all. And so I ended up criticizing the communist manifesto which Deserves criticism and and then I expected him to defend it but he didn’t and so that was Sort of Interesting but non blessing um But he said something very interesting during that debate and it came all of a sudden it came out of the blue, you know And I think it was the most striking part of the entire discussion And then this is just a strange segue, but I’m trying I want to I need to Discuss this because it struck me so hard because I think it’s such an important point I’d never thought about it before so he told me something I’d never thought about before at all He was talking about the Christian passion and he said that his Sense was that the most important part of it was The scene let’s say where Christ is crucified and cries out to God that he’s been Forsaken And he said look you gotta think about what that means. I’m paraphrasing him. He said that the suffering that characterizes individual human life is so intense that even if God Himself Dane’s to undergo it it will test his faith to the point where he will not believe in his own existence That’s really something and I thought wow, that’s such a brilliant. That’s such a brilliant observation. Is that Because it’s definitely the case, you know, if you if you if you interact with people in any manner, that’s the least bit Below the surface you find out that most people are carrying A relatively heavy existential burden of one form or another, you know, I mean most people many people have a physical illness that they’re dealing with or a mental illness that they’re dealing with and if You’re in a fortunate position where you’re not dealing with either of those you probably have a family member that does and if you don’t have either of those you will that’s for sure and And you know, that’s just one of many terrible catastrophes that are certain to visit you and That terrible catastrophe is A challenge to us in many ways. It’s a challenge to us because it forces us to look deeply for a countervailing meaning that can make sense out of that and then maybe more than makes sense out of it and And so I’ve been curious about whether or not that countervailing meaning exists, you know the post modernists The first thing about them especially the identity politics types I never know really what to call this group of people because if I call them postmodern Neo-marxists then I’m accused of being alt right conspiracy theorists and if if I if I call them Collectivists well that’s accurate in some sense But not not precisely and I could call them identity politics players and that happens on the right and the left but that’s the basic Rubric, I would say that uniting Idea is that the individual is that… the individual’s a fiction in some sense and the right level of analysis for… Society and the political scene and and the economic scene is the group right is Who you are as an individual is well, first of all, perhaps that’s just an illusory category altogether But who you are is going to be defined essentially in terms of your group identity your gender Your sex that’s already 70 different things Your your that’d be funny if it wasn’t true Your your Maybe your socioeconomic status your class. That was the original Marxist Definition of identity right because Marx believed that history was a war between two classes and that your fundamental Being was established by your class identity Or it’s your Ethnicity or your race? Those are two other Fundamental group identities or it’s some combination of them all which is Intersectionality, which is something that sort of devours itself and I’ve done a little bit of mathematics It’s like if you could imagine that you belong to ten groups, you know ten canonical groups there’s probably like one of you and so if you get intersectional enough one of the things that happens is that you break the group’s all the way down to the level of the individual if you’re gonna take someone’s group centered peculiarities entirely into account you end up with ends of one and I actually think that that’s what the West figured out thousands of years ago was that if you were gonna take everyone’s Uniqueness into account in the way the intersectionalists appear to want to do with the plethora of group identities that you end up at the individual and so But it but there’s no requirement for coherency on the part of the postmodernists and in fact They believe that coherency is actually I would say something akin to a conspiracy theory. That’s part I’m dead serious. I’m absolutely dead serious about this. It’s a it’s a conspiracy theory on the part of the modernists who invented or elaborated the oppressive Patriarchy that we all exist under which is something akin, I suppose to Marx’s Proletariat versus Bourgeoisie, it’s some mishmash of idiocy like that and But you know, I mean it’s there’s a question there that that’s worth Answering it’s like well Why do we believe in the individual? You know the founders of the people who wrote the Declaration of Independence know it’s like they justified it Right. They said we hold these truths as self-evident like that’s not an argument That’s just a statement. It’s like and it starts a statement like a game in some sense It’s like well, let’s assume these things are true and move on from there and see what happens now They had their reasons, you know, like from a Canadian perspective The people who The Americ… you Americans who Ran a revolution against England. You’re just Englishmen that we’re after their own rights and and And had been denied by by By your colonial status, but the American system is deeply embedded in the English common law system, and it’s deeply embedded in Well, whatever gave rise to the English common law system and certainly part of that is the Judeo-Christian tradition I don’t I don’t think any of that’s particularly debatable and and so I’ve been very interested in what makes these propositions self-evident to look to see if there’s any truth in the sub structure that makes For the self evidence and so I’m gonna lay out some propositions For you today. We’ll see how many I can get to As there’s a number of them that are important I think I’ll start first of all with a little discussion of Genesis I did a biblical series in 2017 on Genesis which some of you might be interested in either watching or listening to. it’s actually being very popular Which is very peculiar I rented a theater of about this size to give the lectures and it sold out 15 lectures on Genesis and almost all the people who came were men which is completely incomprehensible because you can’t get men near a church and you know and and they were usually men and I would say between about 28 and 40 25 and 40 something like that and so it was pretty interesting that they came and the most popular lecture I ever gave on YouTube is On the first sentence of Genesis. It’s like two and a half hours on the first sentence of Genesis You never think anything like that could possibly be popular but I want to tell you a little bit about Genesis because I think it’s I think there are things in it that are Well, they’re what make the self evidence self-evident, but I also think that They’re also true. They’re true metaphorically for sure. They’re true psychologically. I believe and they might be true metaphysically, but I don’t know because no one knows about that and you know, that’s where you’re When you’re speaking of ultimate things your knowledge runs out and so but I’ll stick to the metaphorical and the psychological That’ll do you know so The way Genesis is structured. It’s quite interesting. There’s three elements That are discussed as Constituting the being It’s not It’s not a theory of the material existence like a scientific theory. It’s not that it’s a theory of being so it it’s And that’s a hard thing to understand in itself. You could think about it as a theory of the structure of experience That’s another way of thinking about it. You know, you have experience of the world and You have your emotions and your motivations and you have your aims and your stories and your thoughts your there’s a characteristic human mode of existence That’s conscious. We’re aware that things exist and We we live within that structure and as far as I can tell Given that Genesis is certainly not a scientific account of the structure of the Universe. It has to be some account of some other Of something else and it’s it’s an account of experience itself and maybe experience itself is the ultimate reality And it depends to some degree on how you define ultimate It depends also on how you define reality, but you can play that game You can say well, let’s assume that it’s just that your experience is reality. It’s certainly reality as far as you’re concerned I mean especially and I would say one of the things about that that make that Self-evident is pain Like there’s there’s nothing like pain to convince you that your experience is real I don’t know anyone who isn’t convinced that their experience is real by pain and the only people I know that might be Unconvinced just haven’t had enough pain because if they did they’d be convinced. There’s no arguing it away in Genesis, there’s God and It’s God the Father which applies something like a structure, you know Like like a patriarchal structure that that might be one way of thinking about like a hierarchical structure It’s not surprising because God would be at the pinnacle of the hierarchy and there’s the logos which is the word that God uses to Create order out of chaos. And so there’s God and there’s the logos That’s the Word of God and then there’s the chaos and the chaos is Tohu wa-bohu , or Tehom? Those are the original words and they’re They’re uh…derived from older words from Sumeria from a word Tiamat and Tiamat or Tiamat was a Sumerian goddess a dragon like a subterranean No, no Fiddian monster Who lived in the salt water or who was the salt water? It’s not exactly clear and she was taken apart by the Sumerian Creator god Marduk, who was a hero type like Beowulf or like Bilbo in in in in The Hobbit Its Bilbo in The Hobbit isn’t or is Frodo doesn’t matter. It’s one of those little hobbits anyways and he He confronts Tiamat who has decided in the justify of bull fit of anger in some sense I’ll tell you the whole story Tiamat there’s two gods Tiamat and Abzu Tiamat is the goddess of the salt water and Abzu is the goddess of the fresh water. And as far as the Sumerians were concerned There was the land and underneath the land. There was fresh water and underneath the fresh water There was salt water and the world was a dome on top of that and that was the same conceptual world that the people who wrote Genesis lived in and it’s it’s kind of how the world looks if you go outside in the field looks like there’s a dome There’s some ground if you dig down you hit salt water or fresh water and then you know surrounding that There’s salt water. And so that’s the world and they thought of the salt water in the fresh water as God and Goddess Salt water being the goddess Fresh water being the God and then it was the union of Azbu and Tiamat produced The first generation of children gods and they were Active sort of proto-human creatures greater than human but Human-like and they made an awful lot of racket and they were very careless and they killed Abzu and Then they tried to make their abode on his corpse. That’s a very smart idea Abzu you could think about him the representation of the patriarchy, you know society itself and the idea that the Mesopotamians came up with in this mystical dramatic way was that We’re careless we tend to kill our society and we try to live on its corpse And that’s exactly right and it’s always been right and that’s then that that stories thousands of years old and it was a foundation story for a very sophisticated civilization and it still affects the stories that we live by today and it’s a brilliant idea because of course you were handed your society and you know you may be Doing everything you can to derive as much benefit as you possibly can from it without contributing it to it in the least and so it’s it’s something dead in that it’s the past and it’s something that you can you can Mmm, what would you say? It’s not manipulate precisely you can exploit That’s your privilege How to exploit or exploitation anyways, they kill Abzu stupidly and that makes Tiamat very mad And so she comes back and says well, I’m just wipe you all out. It’s like the flood It’s it’s the same kind of story as Noah and the flood, which is also a very common kind of story And this new God comes up His name is Marduk. And he has eyes all the way around his head and he speaks magic words both of which are very important features because the fact that he has eyes all the way around his head means he pays attention and the the fact that he speaks magic words means that he’s a master of communication and he goes out to Fight Tiamat and he successfully cuts her into pieces and he makes the world and so she’s the goddess of chaos and destruction the goddess of nature and the idea is that That entity that confronts the chaotic unknown cuts it into pieces and makes the habitable world Which is exactly right. It’s exactly right. It’s exactly what you do And then that’s what I want to get at if I can get to it It’s hard. It’s a hard story to tell anyways, that story is at the bottom of the story of Genesis. And so God confronts the Tohu-wa bohu or the tehom with logos and And logos gets elaborated over the course of centuries into a very complex idea First of all logos is or turns into Christ, which is very strange thing. So there’s the Christ in Christianity Who’s there at the beginning of time and then is incarnated in history And is there at the end of time it’s a very strange notion So something that’s eternal and is always there but also incarnated in a specific time and at a specific arbitrary place, right So it’s this principle that is also so it’s Universal and eternal and also local Both at the same time very very important idea and very much relevant to what a human being is like as far as I’m concerned And God uses the logos the word and he interacts with the Tohu-wa bohu the chaos and He generates order and that’s what happens in Genesis, and he generates order over a number of days using the logos and every time he generates a new form of order so each day he says And it was good And so that’s interesting eh because First of all, it’s not obvious that it’s good that goes back to the comment that Slavoj Zizek made it’s like Here we are in this being that’s being Being constructed in this reality and it’s very it’s very difficult reality Human beings are very for us Our lives are bounded limited. We’re mortal we suffer and If we suffer enough injustice Or justice, even sometimes if we suffer enough It’s very easy for us to turn against being and to curse it and it’s not surprising and this is why she Zizek’s words hit me so so hard because when he said that that suffering could become so intense that even God himself would have doubts about The Benevolence of himself in some sense. That’s what that moment means on the cross It’s like well what in the world would you expect from mere human beings? and so But there’s this insistence in Genesis that things that are created as a consequence of the logos are good So first that they’re created by the logos and second that they’re good and so that’s a very interesting set of propositions so the logos is true is something like truthful speech and So, this is partly what makes me a free speech advocate Because I don’t think that you can get to truthful speech without like speeches and speeches dialogical what you don’t know much and you don’t know much and neither do you like we’re full of biases and we and and Blind spots and even when you’re trying to formulate your thoughts clearly, you’re not that good at it Especially if you’re thinking about something complex and chaotic and unknown and you’re gonna have to stumble around Madly and make all sorts of mistakes to make any progress at all and with any luck, you know You’ll be able to talk to other people and they’ll be just as clueless about it as you but out of that Dialogical process if you’re actually trying to communicate something approximating the truth will emerge and Hopefully the truth will set us free as its supposed to and put us on the proper path You see the thing about the collectivist types at the universities, you know, they’re they’re very interested in shutting down free speech But you have to understand that it’s not because they oppose the views of the people That they’re trying to shut down It is that but it’s cuz they don’t believe that there’s such a thing as free speech Because they don’t believe that there’s such a thing as individuals They believe that you’re just the avatar of your group and that whatever your opinions are are conditioned socially constructed and the reason they’re socially constructed is because you’re born in a certain hierarchy of identity and That hierarchy of identity has conditioned every single thing you say so you might think that you’re expressing your opinion but if you’re a postmodernist, you don’t have an opinion because there isn’t a you You’re just the mouthpiece of your privilege or your lack of privilege. And so The debate on campuses isn’t about who should speak and who shouldn’t speak. Although it does degenerate into that the debate is way more fundamental than that and it is well whether There is anyone who has anything to say because the battleground for the post modernists is nothing but identity groups at war with one another For dominance and that’s it. And so this War is way deeper than you think it’s not who should speak. It’s whether There is such a thing as free speech. All right, so back to human beings. I I might manage this So It’s an amazing idea first of all that it’s this capacity for cumulative For speech and and for attention because I think the logos is a combination of that like Marduk you know Marduk has all his eyes and he’s able to speak magic words and So and he’s one source of the idea for what the logo says another source is there’s an Egyptian source It’s often identified with Christ as a god named Horus and you all know about Horus because you all know about the Egyptian eye You’ve all seen the famous Egyptian eye And Horus is the god of attention and He’s often identified with a falcon and or a bird of prey and that’s because the only creatures that can see better than human beings are birds of prey so Eagles for example Bald Eagles They have an eye the same size as ours and they have two central, you know Use your central vision to look at things because you know, if you look right at someone you notice you can see them But you can’t really see the people off to the side they start to fade out You have a foe via in the middle of your eye, which is very very high resolution. But Eagles have two of those and so they can see better than us Eagle can see a dime from the top of the Empire State Building. Although why an eagle would be interested in that isn’t obvious to me But that’s the acuity of their vision. Anyways, the Egyptians one of the Egyptians gods that was identified with the Pharaoh and therefore was sovereignty was Horus and it was Horus’s eye in particular his eye his capacity to pay attention that made him part of what constituted sovereignty so there’s this idea that complicated idea that you have to pull out of multiple sources that The capacity to pay attention and the capacity to speak truthfully takes chaos and transforms it into order into into cosmos and that that order is good and So that so that’s the second part of the the proposition. It’s a very interesting It’s a daring proposition the first proposition is something like consciousness communicative consciousness interacts with The underlying chaotic structure of reality and brings existence into being Now we don’t really know if that’s true There are physicists who suspect that. It’s true. We know that who suspect that without consciousness whatever consciousness is there’d be nothing but something like a vague potential that it requires consciousness to bring structured to that potential to make existence Exist and people argue about that. No one’s exactly sure what it means but But there are physicists who believe that very strongly and Well, and it’s definitely An open question, for example The… an open question of what it is that could exist if there was nothing conscious of its existence Now, I don’t … Existence seems to be one of those things that requires consciousness to be it’s like no consciousness. Well, what is there? Well, it’s not even it’s not possible answer. There’s no duration. There’s no size. There’s no quality. There’s there’s there’s nothing And it’s a mystery. It’s I’m not saying it’s a mystery we understand but implicit in the idea of existence consciousness seems to be implicit in the idea of existence and it does seem that we’re conscious and so Consciousness interacts with chaos to produce order and if it’s truthful and attentive consciousness Then the order it produces from chaos is good. That’s the next proposition and that’s a daring proposition It’s an ethical proposition. So the first proposition in Genesis is like an ontological or epistemological Proposition it’s sort of about the nature of reality but the second is an ethical proposition and it’s a really interesting one and I Think this is this is I don’t know if there’s a more interesting question that you can ask yourself it’s like Because the proposition is that what you bring into the world when you interact with chaos? what is brought into the world in the interaction with chaos as a consequence of truth if that’s what’s embodied in the logos is by definition good and so one of the things I’ve been suggesting to my audiences, it’s one of the rules in my book is that You should tell the truth or at least you shouldn’t lie It’s like you can’t tell the truth because what the hell do you know, but but you cannot lie You know Like each of us knows when we’re about to utter something that isn’t true now sometimes maybe you’re confused about it because you’re ignorant and you’re biased and and so You say something and it might be true It might not be but you know it clear about it but sometimes it’s pretty damn clear that you say something or You do something that you know perfectly well not to be true and you do it anyways and the proposition that Genesis puts forward is If you act in truth then the order you produce is good regardless of how it appears it’s an axiomatic statement of ethical it’s an axiomatic ethical proposition that you’re that the job of Whatever extracts order from chaos Is properly done if it’s done in truth and that’s That’s worth thinking about because it might be true. And then the question is like well, do you believe it’s true? That’s a good question it’s not a religious question even it’s a practical question as far as I’m concerned and my sense is that people just Believe that this is true deeply and The way you can tell that is not by what they say but by what they do and so for example, one of the things that you might observe is that You know if you love someone your children, let’s say You don’t tell them that’s the best way to get through the world is to lie about everything all the time. You don’t sit down You don’t sit them down and say look this is a corrupt Enterprise and All together and you can’t trust anyone because they’re always lying about everything and your job is to become the best liar, you possibly can become because that’s the way to Get to where you need to get to and to set the world straight no one ever does that And so if they don’t do that, which would be belief in the lie, then they must assume something. That’s approximately Opposite and I would say that most people are not- Pleased When they catch their children in a lie, and so then you have to ask well, why is that? it has to be because people believe that the truth is the proper way to proceed and it isn’t obvious why they believe that but it’s obvious that they act as if they do believe that and then I would also say Well, there’s more to it than that because we know for example that Societies that have a high level of trust and there aren’t that many of those in the world They happen to almost all be Western societies Where there’s a high level of trust there’s a high level of economic development They’re unbelievably highly associated and I’ve never been able to figure out how countries ever became Not corrupt, like it just seems completely impossible to me for countries that were corrupt once to ever become not corrupt I don’t understand how that happens at all but there’s a handful of countries in the world that are Fundamentally not corrupt where your default pri… proposition presupposition when you deal with a stranger let’s say in a financial transaction is that you don’t have to be on guard like you’re investigating a pit of vipers Because the person is likely to act out what they say they’ll do and it it reduces the transaction the unnecessary Transaction costs to about zero right? Because I can take you at your word We don’t know each other. I can take you at your word a good example That is eBay You know because eBay was stranger transactions and people were concerned It would degenerate into an unplayable game and turned out that the default trade on eBay was like if you have 98% seller rating on eBay you’re actually a crook, you know You need you need ninety-nine percent or above? It’s so high. It’s unbelievable. So So we do we do know that trust is Necessary. We do assume that people shouldn’t lie. We are upset if our children don’t tell the truth We feel that that’s a moral failing, but we’re not very courageous Because we won’t live the full We won’t live out the full implications of that so the third part of Genesis that I’d like to concentrate on very briefly is the part that makes the Declaration of Independence Self-evident and that is that man and woman alike are made in the image of God And that’s a very mysterious statement because well first of all, it seems on the face of it absurd Partly because it turns God into something approximating a person Because there’s an equation there and that it’s not obvious what that might mean It’s also not clear what being made in the image of God would mean given that by that point in the book you don’t know much about God except that you do know that He uses Logos to extract order out of chaos that’s about all you know, and that that’s good and So the proposition there as far as I’m concerned is that that’s what human beings do that’s what we do and and That this is way more important than people think that we are co-creators of Reality now you think well, do you believe that? Well, let’s let’s let’s think about that for a minute or two. It’s like You know the standard scientists they tend to think of human beings as Materialist and deterministic. I Don’t think that works very well for consciousness. I don’t think there’s any evidence that it works as an explanation for consciousness at all And I think so. I think consciousness is self-evident I mean we certainly act as if it’s self-evident, you act like you’re conscious you act like all the people around you are conscious They’re not happy. If you don’t act like they’re conscious. That’s for sure you’re not going to get along with yourself or your family members or Society at large if you don’t treat people like they’re conscious You’re also not going to get along with any of them Unless you treat them like they are active agents that have some role in determining their own destiny, right? I mean God, you see that in two-year-olds, you know when they’re already pushing for autonomy and so we make these assumptions that while we have this capacity for autonomous choice and I’m gonna split an argument into two parts here. The first thing is I don’t think that we can be deterministic because it looks like neurobiologically that if you want to run deterministically like on habit Which would be what? Deterministically would be you have to practice and practice and practice and practice and practice and build all the machinery that allows you to act deterministically and then there’ll be a stimulus and the whole Deterministic process will lay itself out but that doesn’t happen unless you’ve built the machinery So like if you’re a tennis pro, you know, you’re acting deterministically all the time because you don’t have enough Time to consciously decide what you’re going to do when a ball is come you so fast You can’t actually see it properly It’s all reflex but it’s really complicated chains of reflexes and You spent like ten thousand dollars building them and so fine and when you’re driving your car you’re walking You’re doing these things that you’ve practiced so well, well your deterministic, but when you can counter the chaos of the day That’s a whole different story And so what consciousness seems to do actually is to act when deterministic processes aren’t at hand So and so what we could walk through that we say look look here – here here’s one way of thinking about yourself You’re you’re a clock and you’re wound up and you wind down Mechanistically, but the clock mechanism has to be there for you to wind down mechanistically and unless you’ve practiced something a long time It’s not there so I don’t see how determinism ISM can account for that So here’s an alternative and you can tell me if this is in keeping with your experience. So you wake up in the morning Your consciousness re-emerges from the darkness in which it’s been embedded like the Sun coming up Just why consciousness has always been associated with the Sun we’re daytime creatures and we and we’re creatures of vision and so we identify Consciousness within with the light with illumination with enlightenment you wake up in the morning. And what do you have in front of you? Well, it depends whether you’re excited or worried But it doesn’t it doesn’t really matter because it’s the same thing what you have in front of you This is as far as I can tell is that you have a field of possibility You have a field of potential you might wake up And worry you think well, I have to do this or you know, this series of negative consequences might emerge and I have these Obligations that need to be taken care of for the same reason duties, you know tax bills that have to be opened before they turn into some sort of terrible monster or Work work requirements that need to be done for the same reason to keep to keep chaos at bay And that will run through your mind and if it’s overwhelming if there’s too much chaos in your life You might wake up in the middle of the night and have all that running through your head You have all these this potential of what could be Manifesting itself in front of you and then that’s that that can be very stressful. It can also be very exciting right because The flipside of that obligation is opportunity. And so you see in front of you this field of potential that’s opportunity but what what what you see as far as I can tell with your consciousness is the potential that could be right you see a sequence of worlds that you have some Causal ability to bring into being And and you act like that you think well I have to do this because then this will happen or if I don’t do this then this will happen and hopefully if you’re not too skewed most of the decisions you make are positive ones because you want to take the Potential that’s in front of you the chaos and you want to turn it into a reality That’s good And most of the time you’re going to assume although you may be tempted not to From time to time that the best way to do that is to confront that potential forthrightly and to deal with it in a positive and truthful manner and that The hopeful consequence of that will be that well, even if you don’t produce something good It will be less hellish than it might have been right, but maybe you’ll maybe you’ll get lucky because you’re focused and you’re doing your best and you’re confronting what’s there as potential and you turn it into something good and then you can live with yourself properly and you don’t wake up in the middle of the night and Bemoan, your lost opportunities and your lost possibilities. And so I think that what we are as individuals are spirits that confront the potential of reality and Transform it into the actuality of reality as a consequence of our ethical decisions That’s what it looks like and I think that that’s why There’s an insistence in Genesis that were made in the image of God because we’re partaking in the same process Continually and you know you think well, do you believe that well, huh, let’s look at how you act I mean The first thing is you tend to think you your kids is full of potential and and You tend to think of the world that confronts them as full of opportunity. I mean Or full of potential for that matter the whole potential thing is very strange Notion and we don’t think about it much and I think it’s mostly because we’re materialistic. It’s like there’s nothing material about potential It’s not here. It’s not here now It’s it’s out there whatever that means in the future with no qualities whatsoever Except our apprehension of it. It has no weight. It has no mass it has no has no being whatsoever it’s just what could be but we treat it as it is if it’s more real than anything else what could be and Then if we have children and they don’t live up to their potential they don’t take advantage of their opportunities Then we’re angry at them. We say you had this potential that you could have done something with and you didn’t do it and so that you’ve Sacrificed your own potential by not taking advantage of this opportunity and you’ve made yourself in the world less than it could be and you’re never happy about that not when you’re dealing with someone that you Love you’re always upset because you see very clearly that they are not being who they could be and you and you see Very clearly that that’s a downward path and it’s definitely not something that you want for your children. Then you think too, well What about how you treat other people use yourself? Well Conscience is a good example of that you let an opportunity go by so you have some potential that manifests itself in front of you as a doorway through which you could pass and maybe you you forego the opportunity because you’re Faithless and afraid and I mean that happens to everyone but it doesn’t mean that you’re gonna let yourself off the hook for that You know, if you look at older people and you ask them what they regret in their lives, it’s not the opportunities They took it’s the opportunities. They could have taken and didn’t and it’s because I believe that deep in their conscience part of our structure our deep deep structure We have a known moral obligation to take what’s offered to us in its full Catastrophe And to make the best of it and to do that properly with our ethical choices and that we do not let ourselves off the hook if we fail at that and then I don’t believe that we can organize our human relationships without believing that because if I believe you have no agency and no capacity for Your own choice and your own… I believe you have no ability to transform the future into the into the present into the into the reality of the present I’m going to be you’re going to react to that like it’s demeaning and Patronizing I have to treat you like a moral agent of worth. I have to do that to me I have to do that to my kids I have to do that to my friends and If we do try to establish a community like a political community and we don’t use that as an axiom Then the political community is a bloody catastrophe. And so that’s part of what makes me think that this sort of thing is real It’s like well, it’s real enough so that it governs your relationship with yourself whether you want it to or not It’s real enough that it governs your relationship with your children and their and the rest of your family It’s real enough that if you don’t build your political system with those self-evident axioms Then you just get a catastrophic tyranny. It’s like that’s pretty real So those are the self-evident propositions and so I’ve been talking to people and trying to remind them of this you know because We’re in danger of losing this and we shouldn’t be losing it because there’s something about it. That seems to be correct I think people are afraid of it and then they should be I mean one of the statements with regards to my introduction was that my Observation as a clinician was that no one ever got away with anything And I believe that I’ve seen that because you’d make a mistake Especially a conscious mistake and you think you’ve got away with it. You wait, it’ll come back years later Something something you bent the fabric of reality in some manner and in the short term you got away with it, you know no one noticed but that has consequences that unfold and sooner or later that Chickens come home to roost and sometimes it takes years if you’re doing therapy with someone and they’ve gone off on a very bad pathway to Trace all the decisions all the way back to that one Decision you made that you knew was wrong when you made it and you made it anyways And then you forgot about it because you don’t remember every decision you make and your life is going off astray in some terrible manner I’ve been suggesting to people and this is and I’ll close with this first of all, you have this moral obligation because you have this potential in front of you and the hypothesis is that you should be approaching that let’s say with courage and truth and transforming it into the best that you can transform it into because that’s actually the world and you do that locally you do that to the limits of your power and sometimes you don’t have much power because You’re not that competent and sometimes you have a lot of power and you’re very competent, but it doesn’t matter You have a certain amount of potential at hand and you? can either transform it into the order that’s good or you can do the opposite and Generate a little bit of hell right here and now and if enough of us do that Then we get a very large amount of Hell right here and now and we’ve seen that multiple times particularly in the 20th century with the establishment of great Totalitarian regimes that were based on nothing but lies that were as close to hell as anyone could possibly desire short of metaphysical reality But it’s worse – it’s not only I think that you’re called upon This is a responsibility You’re called upon to act ethically in the Face of this potential that confronts you so that what you produce is good But there’s there’s there’s there’s a part of that. That’s worse that it’s that’s more Burdensome than that even if that’s burdensome enough Make a mistake bring something into reality. That shouldn’t be there then it’s there and then It’s there to plague you and it’s there to plague the people around you and it’s not gonna go away till someone fixes it so that’s a scary thing, but the other thing is is that even if you If you fail to take the responsibility that’s laden upon you to use truth to structure possibility properly then you leave a hole in the structure of being that you Could have filled with something good and it doesn’t just stay there as a hole it’s that you invite something that’s terrible in to take its place and That’s what happens when people become bitter and resentful and cynical because they’ve been hurt in their lives and they start to use deception and They start to deviate from the desire to confront the potential that surrounds them properly and to make things better They they look for revenge. They look to hurt. They they develop malevolent motives and then not only are you not bringing into the world what could be good and Sustaining, but you’re inviting into the world what can definitely be Hellish is the only … to properly conceptualize it and so I think that There isn’t anything more Meaningful or real than the idea of individual sovereignty and that It’s mostly predicated on not on rights but on responsibility Which is where our cultural? Conversation has gone wrong because we’ve been talking about rights forever. It’s like you have a responsibility you’re you’re given a modicum of possibility to play with in your life to do something with to build something with and What you build is dependent on your ethical choices and It’s the sum total of those ethical choices that create the world and then I’ll close with this We actually believe this politically because our Western systems which are quite functional are also predicated on the idea that You’re sovereign Well, what does that mean? What means the government has to respect your rights? But like I said, we’ve talked too much about rights, there’s more to it than that the proposition is that The state is blind and old and decayed and dead and that requires the vision and the truth of the living in order to keep it on track and so what you do to keep it on track is you consult the living each one of us as sovereign individuals and the reason you do that is because of the proposition that You could actually do that. You could open your eyes you could see what was in front of you You could speak the truth and you could keep the ship of state properly afloat and oriented in the correct direction and our entire society is predicated on that idea as well and So that’s the responsibility, right? And it’s it’s a burdensome and terrible responsibility, but I also think given the fundamental catastrophe of life and the fact that you have to deal with that without becoming embittered that you need a weight and a load of responsibility That’s of sufficient magnitude And worth so that it balances the fragility that characterizes you You could make things better You could reduce suffering in the world you could act in a meaningful and truthful way and there would be nothing in that but good if It was good that you wanted and that’s all at the bottom of what constitutes the self evidence of our Equality before God our inalienable rights and The requirement for the consent of the governed Thank you very much Thank You, dr. Peterson We would now like to engage in conversation with dr. Peterson drawing on questions. We’ve received from many of you and Joining with us now are two of my colleagues at the independent Institute The first is Mary Theroux a senior vice president and Graham Walker who was executive director Mary received a degree in economics from Stanford University as she’s been chairman of Garvey international co-founder president and CEO of San Francisco grocery Express and Member the National Board of the Salvation Army as well as chairman of the Salvation Army here in San Francisco. And in the East Bay Graham received his PhD in public law and government from the university of Notre Dame he’s been a professor at Catholic University of America and the University of Pennsylvania as Well as the scholar in the social science at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton Mary do you want to begin? Thank you. Thank you. That was just terrific We really appreciate your being here and you gave us a lot to talk about I’ve heard you say that we humans are more sensitive to negative emotion than to positive And in fact that we’re tilted to negative emotion in terms of its potency But the enormous popularity of your message where you cast a vision that we can overcome problems and we can achieve lives of meaning and love and Resiliency shows the tremendous hunger that exists for that positive alternative In the realm in which independent operates Politicians typically do employ a threat based narrative So the world’s going to end in ten years unless you give us control of the economy with a green new dough, right? In which case it will certainly end in ten years. Absolutely So as with your messaging Independent cast the possibilities based vision, we produce publications and commentary and other things that it’s positive Solutions-oriented has an opportunity based narrative emphasizing how human ingenuity operating within a virtuous framework of the free market Can overcome virtually every challenge including? Improving lives and providing solutions to problems that governments can’t or actually make worse So my question is given your observation regarding the outside appeal of the negative how would you advise us and indeed anybody in the audience who wants to counter that negative that threat based narrative and Advance the opportunity human valuing Narrative well, that’s a great question. I mean there’s an old old idea that you have to rescue your dead father from an abyss and That sort of associated in some sense with the Nietzschean idea of the death of God And when every generation goes through its crisis of meaning, so the question is well, where do you find? the spirit that revives and the answer is in the darkest possible place and And see this is where I think that conservatives go wrong My lectures well Tonight wasn’t particularly a classic example, but my lectures tend to be very dark. There was darkness in this one. I mean there There there is a inalienable reality of Finitude and suffering that characterizes people’s lives and it’s not surprising that they become bitter they become embittered and resentful And that has to be that has to be forthrightly Examined as Deeply as possible Before anything optimistic can emerge because you have to say look I understand why You’re you feel the way you feel but Despite all that and all of that is a lot The proper antidote is the ethical way of life and Not only is it the proper antidote because it’s your duty which is another thing that conservatives stress. It’s deeper than that It’s because it actually works Ya know you need You need a meaningful life It’s not optional because that combats the suffering and more than that if you lead a meaningful life Which means to adopt responsibilities almost inevitably you actually make things better And so you can take people down to the bottom of the abyss and you can say it’s no wonder that you despair given your finitude but There’s so much possibility that surrounds you that You can make something of that regardless of its of the reality of its horror and you do that with responsibility and people understand that and so It it isn’t just a call to make making things better. It’s not a call to a utopia that’s produced by a human imagination. It’s It’s it’s a… It’s it’s it’s the insistence that Without The proper engagement in truth that your life will Your life will degenerate and you will end up embittered and in hell and so The conversation just hasn’t been serious enough I would say and that’s especially bad for young people, you know One of the things I tell young people all the time I’m not a very typical psychologist in this regard because I call it just like to Pat people on the head and say You’re all right. The way you are. I talked to Bishop Baron a while ago I’m gonna broadcast this and he said that the Catholic priests were trained in the 1960s to kind of be accepting, you know humanistically You’re okay. The way you are, you know, and that’s such rubbish it’s like Not only are you not okay the way you are you don’t think that anybody else is okay the way they are either You’re not, you don’t think your children are okay the way they are like you love them and all that But you don’t want them to stay three years old their entire life you want them to Expand and improve and become who they are. And so Instead of telling young people that they’re okay the way they are I tell them that And it’s a terrible message for them if they’re desperate You know, so let’s say ten and percent of the people in my audience are young Maybe they’re young men just for the sake of argument and they’re like not in good shape They don’t have any goals, They’re drinking too much. They’re watching pornography all the time. They’ve got no aim they’ve got no structure in their life and they’re just bloody miserable and the misery is twisting them into Malevolence because enough misery will absolutely do that to you And then what are you gonna do and come along and say well you’re you’re okay the way you are It’s like that’s the last thing they want to hear It’s like get your damn act together, you know You got things to do and they’re gonna be difficult and that there’s a there’s a there’s a an echoing Christian message in there I would say which is you pick up the weight of your suffering Voluntarily and you walk uphill with it and that not only gives you the meaning that you need in life in your life To stop you from degenerating in a dangerous manner, but it actually makes things better And so that that that all has to be part of it like I believe in human ingenuity I think we can solve all the problems that beset us, but it can’t just be It has to be more than we can enhance material well-being. That’s just what it tends to be now It’s not enough. And so and you get brushed off by the apocalyptic types yeah, there’s that that creativity that only comes from the individual consciousness and it can’t be simply reduced to some kind of a Formula or a machine? It’s it’s mysterious in some way which is why I think your Recourse to the archetypal structures of Genesis is so illuminating But there was one thing you said about that that I just wanted to pursue a little bit if I may The idea that we can’t not operate like this is what’s especially compelling in your portrayal Yeah, exactly. Good luck precisely. That’s the thing That’s so strange is that you know Nietzsche thought we could create our own values Right that was his solution to the death of God, right? but you can’t because well Dostoyevsky figured this out right in crime and punishment, for example You try breaking a moral rule Especially one of your own. Mmm-hmm and then try convincing yourself that it’s okay. It’s like good luck with that man You break a moral rule that’s sufficiently deep you’ll traumatize yourself and you’ll never recover and if you break one, that’s you know, maybe just a Medium-sized. Well, all that’ll happen is you’ll wake up at 3 in the morning You know night after night perhaps for years Torturing yourself because of the mistake you made it if you could create your own values You dispense with that in two seconds, you’d say well that was my decision. There’s no fundamental meaning to reality whatsoever I can do whatever I choose and I’m not gonna be guilty about it. It’s like and the point is that’s neither Neither true nor functional. it’s it’s that’s it’s it’s neither true nor functional Yeah, and it’s functional in a psychopathic manner well The closest people and people who are closest to be able to do that are psychopaths, but like their outcomes, aren’t that great They don’t have they’re not they don’t do that. Well, despite what you read about, you know psychopathic CEOs, they don’t do that well and most people caught on to their tricks and generally they spend nomadic lives because they have to go from place to place because People catch on to their deceit and you know, they’re quite prone to suicide and and spontaneous emotional collapse so no you You have this moral law that you exactly yeah But this is one way in which our position as being image bearers of God is a misleading parallel insofar perhaps as God uses his words to create bring order a create order out of chaos And we can create order too by speaking truly the difference being that We don’t know Whether there were any constraints at all constraining his choice at the beginning of the process But we do know that we live within a context ourselves both physically physically naturally as well as morally that constrains our choice we can either Recognize our moral obligations as you said or try and elide them When it’s not successful But we can try And I just noticed one thing that seems a little odd you can tell me if to strike you as odd or not Or maybe I’m missing something in an era when identity politics seems to be everything And as you said a lot of post-modernism has devolved into this notion that there’s nothing but competing groups with their different Self-contained mindsets competing for power and what never the twain shall meet epistemologically and so forth That’s certainly the case and at the same time Doesn’t there seem to be coexisting with that a kind of? mutated Individualism, which is alike what you just mentioned of Nietzsche namely the idea that I can I’m an individual I’m the creator of a meaning. I can use my own words or my own will to create my own identity I’m not obligated to independent moral obligations. I create moral obligations Yeah, how can this kind of mutate a toxic individualism coexist with identity politics? Well, I say the things things that you cheat. What is it? You can chase nature Oh with a pitchfork, but she always comes rushing back in right? You know, if you if you one of the things I tried to do in maps of meaning which was the first book I wrote was to write a description of what distinguished a religion from ideology and One of the things that distinguishes a religion from an ideology as a religion takes everything into account it’s like well, there’s a tyrannical element of culture, but there’s also the benevolent element and there’s the tyrannical element or the destructive element of nature but there’s also the creative element and there’s the Heroic element of the individual which would be embodied say in Christianity in the figure of Christ But there’s also the adversary there’s always this balance. Yeah With if you think everything is a social construct, so it’s all social Well, the individuality is going to creep back in somewhere and it does it in exactly the form It’s this very very childish form, right because it’s so immature. It’s so underdeveloped. It’s like well, we’re entirely socially constructed Except at moment to moment We can determine our gender and by our own individual choice and everyone has to bow down to that Yes, yes. Well, that’s also what makes it so childish. Is that not only Not only is it in the incoherent doctrine because you can’t have it both ways You’re not socially constructed and able to choose your gender Those things don’t go together, but the idea that your identity now self-produced Also takes precedence over the negotiation you have to have with other people about what your identity is going to be is Really at the same development level I would say as a two-year-old and I mean that I mean that technically because two-year-olds two-year-olds cannot Take their own Identity and integrate it with the identity of other children they can’t do that until they’re about three and so it’s so It’s it’s so infantile that it’s almost beyond imagination like epistemic solepcism Meaning meaning I mean that the idea that only I exist that solepsicm is amiss so that yeah that I therefore I know only what I know, but everyone else doesn’t really exist. Everyone else is an illusion I only am familiar with my own thoughts and the only true reality is the reality that I experience everyone It’s like except you can’t live consistently with that and no one does well, but guess those aren’t identities It’s this is another thing. That’s so immature about it. It’s like okay, you’re gender fluid fine. Well now what? I’m dead serious. I’m dead serious. Like what the hell are you gonna do with that? you know like Part of the reason you have gender roles and and of course their tyrannical and constricting, you know obviously because everybody gets taken by culture and crushed into something, that’s a Compromise between their individuality and the rest of world everyone suffers from that But you know, if you’re if you’re let’s say you’re straight and you’re heterosexual For sorry. Those are the same thing Let’s say you’re heterosexual and you’re monogamous and you’re in a committed relationship so like all of a sudden you have an identity Well, what’s the identity? Well, it’s easy You get married? You have children You raise them together you tie your lives together. You try to you try to build something for the decades, right? And that’s an identity. It’s a pathway forward. It’s it’s a way to be well, I’m gender-fluid It’s like, okay. Well pick your pronoun. It’s like, okay. Well, what do you do tomorrow? Well, I’m I don’t know. I’m out there in no-man’s land. You don’t want to be in no-man’s land. That’s not good You’re off the beaten path you think well, I can go off the beaten path. It’s like You go off the beaten path and you just see how long you last You’re lucky if you’re if you’re a highly creative person and you’re very disciplined and you have most of your life in pristine order you might be able to risk a Substantial deviation from the beaten path and managed to maintain your sanity But if you’re a disorganized person and you wander off the pathway of tradition you are in so much trouble You can’t even possibly imagine it there are things out there that you will encounter that you have Absolutely, no defense against whatsoever. And so it’s naive beyond Comprehension it’s like Well, I’m a new kind of gender. It’s like You’ve got 60 years to figure that out and then take Fifty thousand years to even take a crack at it, so it’s terrible Mary did you have another question you want to ask? I think we can slip one in because I think one more you okay? You talk about how dangerous it is to tell some Young person whose life is messed up that they’re just great the way they are with which I completely agree But how do you reach a young person who’s bought into the notion that life is meaningless? Well, you’re the first thing is you tell them why they think that It’s like they’ve got all sorts of reasons to think that it’s like life is hard. It’s it’s it’s a crucifixion That’s right. And so It’s no wonder they think that it’s like okay fine. First of all, we’re gonna take it seriously. Yeah, you’re suffering and adrift and you have your reasons but so you take those reasons seriously, and you say despite that Despite that there’s more to you than you think and you know that too because you upgrade yourself for not Manifesting it and you say to people well I ask people for example Who do you admire? Because that’s the instinct for admiration is part of the instinct for imitation. It’s like how do you admire? Do you admire people who are completely irresponsible you admire people who can’t take care of themselves. They can’t even take care of themselves Here’s the most admirable person Completely useless to themselves maybe even counterproductive just a bloody catastrophe for their family and like What would you call a social danger like no one admires that no one admires that it’s like you start Minimally, can you take care of yourself? At least that? That’d be the first thing and then is there more than eyes there enough to you so that maybe someone else could rely on you Now and then maybe maybe a number of people maybe your family it could be a it could be the glue that holds them together and and And mends them and then maybe there could be more to you than that. Maybe you could be Someone for your community and god only knows how far you could go with that. Those are the people you admire It’s like well try that out See what happens and start locally Jung Carl Jung said this is one of my favorite Carl Jung Quotes that modern man does not see God because he will not look low enough. I Really like that. And so, you know, I’ve been telling the people that I talk to the same thing it’s like you have a certain amount of Potential within your grasp you may find what you have contemptible because you’re not in a position of power this modicum of Possibility that’s been granted to you is beneath you and so you do nothing with it. And so you get nothing from it You take that seriously you do the small things You can the humble things that you can to put yourself together in that in those tiny Embarrassing ways that are real and if you do that enough you’ll You’ll will fortify yourself and that will work and you know, one of the things that’s been unbelievably hardening to me It’s ridiculous really like Normally now if I go out during the day If I go to any city I’ve been to like 150 cities in the last year and if I’m walking around on the street or in an airport Someone will come up to me about every 10 minutes or so, and they’ll say the same thing They always say the same thing They first of all apologize for bothering me and they’re very polite To all my interactions with people you’d never guess this from like my reputation in the press but all my interactions with people in public are unbelievably positive and the people will come up and say You know, I was in this small domain of hell a year ago or six months ago, whatever It is addiction. Alcoholism. I wasn’t getting along with my family I’ve been living with my girlfriend for five years and we were stuck. I didn’t have any direction for my career I was nihilistic, you know, I was whatever, you know, although different ways that people can fall into a pit and and and and Be miserable said I read in your books or I watched your lectures and I decided I was gonna I Was gonna try to put my family together Or I was gonna I was gonna make a vision and pursue it or I was going to try telling the truth just try one of these things and things are way better way better, you know And sometimes it’s a father and a son or sometimes. It’s a son and a daughter it’s usually it’s usually it’s not often a daughter and a mother not so much but I Mean if it’s a pair of people But or it’s a girlfriend and a boyfriend and the girlfriend is very happy usually because her boyfriend has straightened up Substantially and maybe they’re getting married and like he’s half civilized at this point but But but it’s but it’s it’s an unbelievably positive thing to see and and it’s a real thing You know it’s like it’s it’s so interesting to watch the fact that all people have to do is put some of these things into practice and All of a sudden that little modecum of potential that they had because they got humble enough to deal with it properly Starts to expand and expand and like I believe and I do believe this and I think this is part of the Christian message Fundamentally is that there’s actually no limit to that expansion You know because in some sense like we are this weird combination of finite and infinite like we’re related to the infinite in some manner obviously because the infinite Exists and here we are and so we’re related to it in some manner and I don’t know what manner that is But I don’t know what the limits are It’s like if you were the best person you could be No truly if you Decided to live by truth and to aim at the good and you really did that you put your whole heart and soul into it Like you were like that’s what you were staking your life on because you’re staking your life on something who the hell could you be? And no one knows, you know, you know perfectly Well, you could be far more than you are and you don’t know what the oppor limit of that is And we certainly don’t know what the upper limit would be If there were lots of people doing that god only knows what problems we could solve, you know There’s lots of suffering and misery in the world Plenty and it’s no wonder that people get bitter But God as you pointed out before, you know We’ve got no shortage of ingenuity and possibility and if we were serious about making things less wretched than they are Who knows what miracles we could pull off? I want I want to especially thank Dr. Peterson again for his brilliant courageous and inspiring work and We’re particularly grateful to all of you for joining with us tonight i Want to also especially thank the wonderful people who’ve made tonight possible especially my colleagues that the independent Institute Our team is just fabulous and i thank you for that. I particularly want to thank my colleague Alicia Luthor Who’s our director of administration For all of her supportive work and organizing and overseeing all that made tonight possible Incidentally, there are copies that you may have noticed of 12 wheels for life outside signed copies Please visit our website at independent dot org for information about upcoming events and publications and more We look forward to seeing you again at future independent Institute events Thank you and good night

100 Comments

  • Hunter Bowles

    Dr. Peterson is other than my father I would have to say one of the most inspiring men I ever watched. I'm not a big believer in god but perhaps he came along right at the moment our collective western consciousness needed him most. Fortune favors the brave and he's taken the hits from people trying to destroy our values out of some misguided sense of guilt and relativism.

  • Black Shingo

    How ironic is it that we are returning to Heidegger's revelations about Being and the loss of the fundamental question of philosophy…

  • ThisIsSolution

    The struggle and plight of every human is so sufficiently difficult that when God descended into the ranks of human as Jesus he himself was tested and was almost broken by temptation, even on the cross, knowing God is real and in Heaven as his father, he cried out "why have you forsaken me". Jesus the son of God felt that HE was abandoned by his father,….what chance does a regular, non-god person have then? zero chance, that's why you need God.

  • Mary De Voe

    The sovereignty of the human being is pronounced through the acknowledgement of The Supreme Sovereign Being WHOSE Love, Justice and Mercy are perfect and infinite.

    Latent sovereignty, that sovereignty unacknowledged, laid waste and discarded or worse, hated, held in contempt and disdain brings forth evil of unimaginable proportion.

    Homo Sapiens, the man of wisdom maintains his innocence.

    The King James version of the Bible refers to God as a thing, a "which" and a "that. This needs to be a "WHO in heaven"

    The Supreme Sovereign Being is Three Sovereign Persons in one Trinity.

    The sovereign person is referred to as a "WHO"

  • Vic Martinez

    Six words of the Declaration of Independence are always forgotten: "In order to secure those rights …" That phrase defines and limits the role of government under the American experiment. That phrase also defines that the main role of government is to protect the individual from coercion.

  • Matt Spinto Smith

    We do have as individuals have a huge responsibility to ever renew democracy. The greatest threat comes from dishonest messages from politicians and think tanks who have been bought by corporations and commercial lobby groups – and who wish to persuade us to acquiesce in decisions that funnel all power away from ordinary people to the point one per cent. This process is leading to the destruction of the middle class, not to mention the working class.

  • Benjamin David Eddy

    As long as we stay individuals we will continue to be slaves to individualistic perspectives… Individual sovereignty is a dead end. All individuality is. As all notions of the self eventually dies to a higher global understanding. Awareness, consciousness, these are universal. The individual point at which they are expressed through is just an access point. And the access point cannot be raised above that which is accessing it.. individuality is the perfect perspective tool for a ruling class to continue. “The Word” and living by it, is the base underlying deceit to all of this. There is no perfect word, or phrase or any combination of words that can be used universally. However we all can, without words, feel and experience that which is. We can see, hear, taste and touch it. Trying to speak it is a dead end.. the true serpent. The tongue of the human mouth and all its games it plays on that which plainly is. Don’t believe what comes out of the mouth, even your own, believe the rest for it is far more real and self evident. The word is and always will be a pale mirror. It’s all it can be. A description. Now we have made it a religion. And that’s where we fell.

  • J. Ryan

    1:14:15 – "You can't have it both ways. You're not social constructed and able to choose your gender." I'm a little confused by this, because it seems like these two ways of thinking would work well with one another. If someone believes everything is a social construction then in their mind, gender can be one of those things, right?

  • Kamala lynda Gail Todd Davidson holt

    Thank you . When talking about children and not being pleased about them lying – which I believe is true , how confusing to them it must be when we lie to them often eg the Father Christmas exists , the tooth fairy, boogie man , Easter bunny , even never talking about death and impermanence in a way is a hidden lie, etc are these the very foundations for them to subconsciously, at any rate, distrust us at a foundimental level and later compounded by education systems telling mere teories as truth and so on and so forth . It is further compounded that often when indeavouring to tell your truth or observation you are told to 'shutup " or that you are 'lying" etc . So although truth is the last leg remaining standing in this age that makes us individual conscious beings with some integrity – it appears it is being servered at every angel and when lost will indeed be the end of civilisation of worth and individualism will be totally lost to the lie!? All seems bleak but the Logos says he will always appear in the Bhagacvad Gita , Bible, – in the instruction or through the shaman , the saint and disciplic particioners of truth to reignite that truthful path again. I guess that is hope and faith ! ?

  • Flaoo

    I need examples of actual people who believe that only group identity matters and individuals are fiction. Quotes etc.

  • Richard Hunter

    So true, but today we have people not believing in basic truths of male/female. That genitals attached to one's body can be swapped for the other, and academia, educators, doctors, philosophers, counselors, teachers, lawyers, CEO's, VP's of businesses, Diversity Departments all buying into this dogma with no checks…what can a father do against it?

  • Charles Martel

    Individual sovereignty is everywhere under attack as part of a deep state plan to reduce everything under collective "equality." "Only a god can save us now" — Heidegger.

  • brady tanguay

    Jordan Peterson has changed my life and has given such a blessed outlook that i would never have formulated on my own. Thank you so much Jordan. You are great man and i love you for it.

  • John Smith

    RESPONSIBILITY AND RIGHTS.
    Women "want", women demand "rights", but don't want "accountability".

    They "want" the assets, but not the liabilities attached to them.

    They "want" the equality of responsibility that men have, but not the "accountability" that comes with that "responsibility" … women want "power" and "rights" (just because they are born with a vagina), not "power" and "accountability".

    They want to outsource the accountability and just have power and rights … in that way the get to cherry pick all the good bits and when their actions bring negative consequences then they want to outsource those negative consequences to other people … blame others, because they have "rights", not "accountabilities" for their actions … they burden others with the "accountability".

    In essence it is inequality, not equality.

  • Mary De Voe

    Friedrich Nietzsche, in his will to power lost, forfeit, his ability to act in free will, to change from Christianity to atheism, then to revert to Christianity, in an act of free will. Nietzsche lost his personal freedom to his agenda, his ideology.

  • Calebwarden11 Calebwarden11

    How can people dislike this video. Been watching you Mr. Peterson for alittle over 3 years now. I believe you break the barrier of reality and common sense so easily. Appreciate the talks and speeches. One question, will you be going on Joe Rogan's podcast again?

  • Mary De Voe

    Dr. Jordan B. Peterson struggles to define existence; the existence of existence. He needs the word “infinite” but uses the word “eternal”, whereas God is infinite and eternal. “Eternal” to me means through existence to eternity.

    The sovereign person comes from infinity to eternity.

    Jesus Christ, WHOM Dr. Peterson refers to as the “Logos”, HE WHO brings order out of chaos is infinite as God and eternal as man.

    Dr. Jordan B. Peterson struggles to define The Supreme Sovereign Being.

    Saint Thomas Aquinas said that God can only be described as ONE WHO cannot be described. So holy, that people cannot say His Name, except that God has called us to say His Name: “I AM”. “I AM” is from WHOM all creation comes into being; the existence of existence.

    Jesus Christ is the revelation of God: “I AM HE”.

  • Tiktaalik

    Peterson, the major league con artist.

    On nearly every occasion where Peterson makes a straightforward, comprehensible statement of fact, he's outlandishly fucking WRONG.

    Pick just about any of the zillions of Peterson videos. In one, he glares at the camera with his signature faux serious expression and declares: There are FAR more female physicians than male physicians! (Actually, 69.9 % are male.)

    Or maybe L. Ron Peterson's pathological nonsense about IQ? Here's but a taste. If you want to be the best at what you're doing, then having an IQ above 145 is a necessity and maybe you're pushing 160 in some situations.

    That would certainly surprise Richard Feynman, a leading figure in 20th century physics and one of the most explosively creative individuals in modern history, who had an unremarkable IQ of 125.

    Oops…no time to dwell on such trivialities as facts, Peterson is off talking about Alice Cooper (I wish I were kidding) or how to get girls or his lunatic hobby horse of Marxism, (about which he is similarly uninformed).

    Jordan Peterson on Postmodernism.
    Jordan Peterson on why the CUBS keep losing.
    Jordan Peterson on Aztec metallurgy.
    Absurd!

    The LAWWWWBSTER! The LAWWWWBSTER!

    Lobsters did NOT diverge from humans 350 million years ago as Peterson bizarrely insists in his rant with Cathy Newman and in his "book." He's off by over 400 million years. Indeed, where biology, evolution and neuroscience are concerned, Peterson gets virtually every relevant fact spectacularly wrong.

    I was particularly intrigued by Peterson’s insistence that ancient Chinese, Egyptian and Hindu peoples were acquainted with the structure of DNA and depicted it in their colorful artwork. Yeah. That's highly plausible. Fucking LOON!

    Of course, L. Ron Peterson's day would scarcely be complete without him saying something idiotic about quantum mechanics:

    Now you may know that there's an interpretation in quantum physics, for example, called the Copenhagen interpretation, and not everybody agrees with it, but according to the Copenhagen interpretation no event is an actualized event until it's perceived. And the person who formulated that hypothesis, John Wheeler, is one of the most renowned physicists of the 20th century and he believed, before he died, quite firmly that whatever consciousness is played an integral role in Being. Now it seems to me after studying this for a very long period of time that the entirety of Western civilization is predicated on the idea that there's something divine about individual consciousness and after studying that for such a lengthy period of time and trying to figure out what it meant, I think I found out what it meant. I think I found out that the reason that our archaic stories say that human beings, men and women, are made in the image of God is because consciousness plays a central role in Being itself.

    Wrong. Garbage. Lunacy. Oh–and does "John Wheeler" sound like a Danish name to you? Is that why it's called "The Copenhagen Interpretation"–because John Wheeler lived and worked in Copenhagen? Anyone who has even HEARD of the Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum mechanics knows it was formulated by Niels Bohr, not John Wheeler. He's confusing the Copenhagen Interpretation with the anthropic principle.

    He also cites GODEL theorem to try to pass off his hokey religious bullshit.

    Speaking of which, Peterson describes having a profound religious experience "while listening to Mozart's 4th Symphony—the JUPITER Symphony." Pretty moving account, save for the fact that the Jupiter is Mozart's FORTY FIRST symphony, not his FOURTH.

    Just google what this hyena says. It's always WRONG.

    He's a fervent climate change denier, largely based on the laughable horseshit of fellow con artist Bjorn Lomborg.

    He claims in his H2 interview that the trunk of his car is infested with ghosts. GHOSTS!!

    In his chat with Joe Rogan, Peterson claims he went 25 days without sleep after having a nervous breakdown due to APPLE CIDER!
    Go check it out!

    Peterson, in a mangled discussion of Nietzsche makes a senseless digression into the feline visual system. At 28:13 he says:
    The rat freezes because he’s using predator avoidance strategy basically to deal with the threat. It doesn’t move because if it moves a predator could pick it out like a cat because cats can see lateral movement. That’s why they have slit eyes, by the way. So they can detect lateral movement. And you know that because if you play with your cat like this (motions with his hand side to side) it will follow your hand but if you do this (moves his hand vertically up and down) it wont. (bullshit). It’s cuz it doesn’t chase things that do this (moves his hand up and down). It doesn’t chase kangaroos!

    No that is complete bullshit from top to bottom. That is NOT why cats have slit eyes and yes they absolutely CAN follow vertical movement. I feel bad for gullible kids sitting in this looney's lecture hall listening to this inane bullshit hour upon hour and thinking they are getting educated.

    Con artist. Sleezeball. Neo-Nazi. Fraud. Nice diagrams of dragons though. LOL.

  • Stem Factory

    1:09:20 Formula for consciousness, Modern man will not find God because he won't look low enough. I thought you had articulated a formula for consciousness already, in that you are a construction of an underlying hierarchy of subsystems that have compounded on top of one another from your biological DNA to the function of the psyche, it's out of this system that your self-aware consciousness arises. What makes your heart pump? it's not your self-aware consciousness it's the same system that makes your hair and nails grow you are not in control of that system and it's most of you, the self-aware consciousness is the driver or the eye on top of the pyramid.

  • Your Friend The Internet

    Whenever you hear someone say " Judeo Christian Values " you know they are lying. Jewish values are the Antithesis of Christian values. The core of Christianity is believing in Christ. Thats why its called CHRISTianity . Judaism VEHEMENTLY denies CHRIST as Devine or of the holy trinity . Our civilization was not built on these 2 ideals that are at 100% odds with each other. Western civilization was built on CHRISTIANITY . Its a trick to try to make people think that a group of people who's occupation on earth are less than a % played a equal or greater roll in shaping AMERICA as or than Christian values have. What a lie. No wonder JPB is partnered up with the likes of Ben Shapiro. Its clear that these individuals , though appealing at first glances are only seen as such by design , are funded by an establishment who has an agenda, motive , and goals set forth with a script in place on how to achieve it . Through this , JPB is playing his part in a culture war to snuff out Nationalism and Christian Identity , by trying to Redefine Christianity to be something more " Judeo " which is literally the inverse of christianity . To be Jewish is to DENY CHRIST AS YOUR LORD AND SAVIOR. TO DENY CHRIST AS YOUR LORD AND SAVIOR IS THE OPPOSITE OF CHRISTIANITY . When you watch this reader / speaker and reading his script, watch when he reads and says " Judeo Christian Values " . What an oxymoronic thing to say or suggest. I cant believe how many fools fall for this trick. Candace Owens does it too. Disgusting. Shamefull. Words are spells, thats why its called spelling. May god grant you each wisdom and strength to see through Charlatans who speak on behalf of the dollars and cents that are provided to them for said employed cause.

  • Justin Case

    When you're alone, thinking, is the universe still there or is it still only what you think it is? Is it only other people that change your reality? If I'm alone and then alone with a dog, my thinking and experience is different and less self involved. If it's a person it's more complicated and less peaceful and only occasionally more interesting. Have I been taught to experience this, or have I been taught to think this?

  • Carl Smith

    It would be informative for your take on the young killers that are out for maximum chaos?
    It's obvious something has gone haywire with thier mental ability to process reality but what, in your opinion, is the overriding trigger. Attention? Fame? Suicide by Cop?

  • Malcolm Nadeau

    The lie seems to serve an individual's interests. What about a shared lie? Like the one that allows a person's conscience to accept all the injustice in the world and still sleep at night. The one we tell ourselves to believe we're just naturally good people, instead of accepting that we're just easily corrupted and constantly on the verge of doing something selfish and destructive. Something about a physical world forces a person to sometimes choose destruction as a way to feel they have some power. Which is why I think people smoke, drink, do drugs, drive to fast… or that they commit professional suicide. When poverty limits a person's choices to the point they are dissatisfied with their life and can't imagine anything beyond their scenario and despair self-destruction becomes a reasonable thing. When other people reflect in you the fragility of human kind and you're struggling to overcome that sentiment then killing them might seem right. Like if someone were crying constantly… especially an adult because the expectation would be that this person control their emotions and contribute responsibly rather than overwhelm everyone with their problems… anyway, a lie can create a problem that is intangible, unmanageable, and a diversion from the real practical issues. But to be very very honest, since we all live with our illusions and are each limited by our single perspective… we can't help but be so wrong about so many things. To say that we have to be honest should just mean we don't try to be God. But we still have to make choices because either way there will be consequences. If it's a test then it's one we are bound to lose. Accepting to lose everything and despite having every reason not to care to decide to love and contribute positive things… I say that's the only real option… and lying doesn't fit in with that mindset, unless for example it would serve to protect someone from being tortured and dismembered.

  • Mary De Voe

    Inscribed and irrevocably ratified, our Founding Principles: The Declaration of Independence and The Constitution for the United States of America may only be changed with three fourths of the states ratifying a change.

    All generations and all future generations of citizens are George Washington’s constitutional Posterity as inscribed in The Preamble, the purpose for our Constitution. George Washington's constitutional Posterity, "We, the people" come under the purview of our freedom.

  • Luis Fernando Ojeda Varrasso

    Jordan you should debate with Taleb. You both share a similar vision on suffering (Antifragile) and individual responsibility (Skin in the game) but also it would be amazing to compare your psychologist vision with his mathematician and statistical framework

  • The Don of M-Town

    I'm sick of the comments which praise God for anything positive while there is no mention of God whenever something in the world is bad or unjustly. Your belief in God.. And more specifically, that god is 'good' and fair is pure confirmation bias.. And it's retarded. People who believe in God only do so, to just deal with their anxiety of their death and to me, have no actual selfhood. Fucking weak.

  • Finesse

    Hey I’m trying to deeply study psychology and expand on different theories but in order to do this I need to therapy different people in different difficult situations or bounce ideas with someone who has a lot of understanding on how people think and themselves have cognitive thinking

  • unbere afigendlic

    Everytime I hear one of your interviews or presentations I think "That's the best one he's done. I need to memorize that one."

  • Rooster Forge

    If the religious aspect of this lecture interests you and you find main stream religions inadequate in teaching these deeper ideas of existence you should study the doctrine of premortal existence taught by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

  • Alan B Stewart

    If you are demanding proof of the validity of a conscious state, you are limiting that conscious state to the level of your proof which you are demanding.

  • Tony Sortore

    @ around 36:00 it sounds like he is assuming that humanity alone has consciousness which has produced order in the form of society, and that nature is unconscious and chaotic. That does not sound very coherent to me.

    It seems to me that, assuming he is correct about consciousness producing order, that nature (and humanity by extension) is ordered and conscious, and humanity, which is able to conceptualize and compartmentalize order/chaos and conscious/unconscious has created chaos to explain what it does not understand or would like to avoid — for a variety of reasons, sanity, survival, happiness, etc…

  • Tony Sortore

    40:00 Peterson's lack of political awareness baffles me sometimes. I agree with him on many of the topics he addresses, but when it comes to his praise of western society for ridding itself of corruption I just want to jump into my computer and set him straight.

  • Tony Sortore

    I understand that JP is a therapist and thus thinks on a personal level, but when he makes a distinction between heirarchies and corrupt heirarchies without ever trying to pinpoint the source of the corruption or tyranny.

  • Martin Merx

    I can watch an entire JP video in the time I'm waiting for my wife to get ready. What ever did I do before these videos?! Thank you.

  • Arun Mahadev

    Tatvamasi … it simply is Dr. JBP. Yes conciousness is implicit in experience and yes it is a choice to see it so. It is ,it was and it will continue to be. The Christ / Narayana( ever pervading conciousness) will manifest and it will always be a part of the communion of potential and structure and it manifests in these epic stories as the point in infinity that connects the internal infinite to the external infinite. Anyway, it's nice to see you go through this philosophical exercise. Makes me appreciate the philosophical rigor carried out by sages of the past. Maybe at some point someone will come along and explain better to you the philosophy of the east rather than the surface level stuff that is pinned to the tribalism of the east. Here's a hint that I actually learnt from you that helped me understand the west, focus on language. Etymology. Go to source scripts.

  • Earth Angel Leia Morgana

    How to become a Biblical Elect
    (Like Jordan B. Peterson)

    If you want to become an Elect, then you should read the KJV Bible, fast, and pray about it. It’s not difficult. Vegetarianism and veganism both count for all intents and purposes as fasting. Try to pray for thirty minutes a day, read the KJV Bible for 30 minutes a day, and be a vegan or a vegetarian. If you do this, there is a good chance that an angel will visit you or that you might automatically be put onto Elect radio. I’m telling you this as an earth angel. I only serve the Lord Jesus.

    That being said, Hebrew doesn’t mean what you think it means unless you’re educated on the subject. It is called being a good Christian. If you’re ambitious, then keeping up with Doctor Who doesn’t hurt. Of course Jordan Peterson knows all about this already. Watch Doctor Who and figure it out. They talk about Hebrew constructs like Sheol and the like and how to escape (this is in the Bible – Doctor Who is very cosmically Christian).

    If you want to become a Hebrew, it is not difficult. This is a real thing! It’s called being an Elect. This is how you can become one. Jesus loves you!

  • Mary De Voe

    Dr. Jordan B. Peterson: Bring your wife, Tammy, to Saint Joseph’s Oratory in Montreal on Mount Royal. There in the crypt is the sarcophagus of Saint Andre Bessette, the miracle worker of Montreal who healed me when I touched his tomb.

  • Mary De Voe

    Jesus Christ is the revelation of God. Jesus spent His time on earth doing His Father’s will and work. The three sovereign persons in the Trinity of the Supreme Sovereign Being are a community of love, the first family.

  • Zonun Ralte

    Dr. Peterson would go down in history as the man who had saved the civilization of his time from the nihilistic deconstructionist/ post-modernist approach to reality.

  • Tiffany Timbric

    Jordan B. Peterson appears correct; however, does he believe that gay and transgender people should constrain themselves to binary gender roles? Clearly that is not right. He can not be ignorant of the natural variation I see in all mammals including people. Dogma is wrong. Negative judgement and discrimination against gays and transgenders is wrong. Please, Jordan, please address the problems you cause for me by so many who perceive your message as justifying their negative judgements against me and the discriminations therefrom.

  • Solace Creat

    Sigh I love Jordan's mind, but his tremendous bias for individuality shines just as brilliantly. He's totally right on most things, imo. But, in his babble about the "post-modernists", he says "It's as if the individual doesn't even exist." Yet, this is exactly Jordan's stance in reverse: it's as if the collective doesn't even exist. His whole thing is how if the individual changes, so too does society. But he completely neglects societal change.

    As Slavoj nailed him in the debate, would you tell a North Korean to simply "put their house in order before thinking about society"? No. The system needs to change. The goal of the system should be not only encouraging personal responsibility and growth as Peterson does–which equates effectively to "Get your shit together bitch," [which, don't get me wrong, has helped me tremendously in my own life]–but the system needs to actively foster individual's growth and personal responsibility.

    If I put a gun to your head, it doesn't matter how responsible you are: an external force is preventing you from excelling.

    Yeesh. Jordan's so blind in this area it amazes me. He must need to believe it's all personal responsibility, because that is how he fixed his own life. So he expects everyone to fight just as hard as he has had to.

    The post-modernists don't take individual responsibility into account–Peterson doesn't take societal responsibility into account.

    I love the man, and he's the only one who gave me the answer I needed. But this is a fatal flaw in his reasoning.

  • Robert Hayes

    I suppose I'm as guilty of this as the average person, but who is familiar with Marx's writings beyond 'The Communist Manifesto' and 'Capital'? Most of JBP's criticism of Marx seems limited to the former.

  • K Lesaichuk

    Why is it assumed that consciousness creates order from chaos especially when nature doesn’t need us… why is it assumed consciousness is order… and why is it assumed order is good when it’s about control…

    What about reality and actual independence… what about self-direction and the ability to think for one’s self… how is it adults are still being told what to do…

    There’s law of attraction. There’s also laws of distraction.

  • Yeshua Vargas

    Although Christ's cry from the cross may be interpreted- in a sense – as Dr Peterson does, it cannot be forgotten that the Lord is actually directly quoting Psalm 22. Psalm 22 is a Psalm of trust in the face of unimaginable humiliation and strife. Its a Psalm of victory which describes exactly what was happening at the cross with regards to The Lord, as well as the Jews. In light of this Psalm we see that the interpretation that "God lost faith in Himself" is pushing poetic hyperbole to the extreme, if not just flat out wrong.

  • Butcha Pete

    It has taken me two straight years of listening to this man (which led me to others like Jocko or Naval Ravikant,) but I've finally gotten my life back on track.

    I hope things are going better for your family, Dr Peterson.

  • KungFuKuya

    I am overcoming insane anxiety jumping into becoming a student of economics after 10 years. Every fiber in my body screams flee, but my soul – and your lectures Jordan – tells my body to stay calm and boldly go forward. You're lectures, philosophy and persona has inspired me in ways I always looked in movies and music. But in the end – I only need a father figure to tell me straight that there is no escaping the chaos that is life.

  • Eugene the Philostopher

    It was always strange to me that Peterson puts Marxists and postmodernists in the same bin. They are very different.
    The fact that Peterson doesn't like them both doesn't mean there is any similarity between them.

  • Richard1979hush

    he goes to such depths that you better wear an oxygen mask to reach back up to the surface. actually what i said doesnt make much sense since one can go higher than the depths by using a spaceship and therefor exceed any depth of any sea… actually i messed up by comparing the airtank capacity with the hights and depths so i compared two things that dont belong in the same category. my mind changes levels too rapidly which leaves me all confused and now im realizing how ive wasted time but decide here to not waste any more of yours…

  • pastmike

    I was a little underwhelmed of the beginning of the presentation, mostly for egoistic reasons, since it wasn't providing me with something I need right now. Then he just dropped this:
    "What should constitude the transcendent value that sits above all other values is your capacity to voluntarily accept the restricted and painfull conditions of your life. To face them and as a consequence of that to immediately transcend them."
    This is excactly the answer to a question I would have asked him if I had the chance. What is an example of a "higher good"?
    It took 24 hours to sink in and lift my mood which was declining bit by bit within the last weeks. Obviously I needed that answer. Truly amazing. Thank you.

  • The Cult of the Jim

    I use the "it's all been said before" angle all the time, though I imply older generations had the same or a similar idea first so look there for wisdom to build off of. I didn't think of it as a way to say "shut the hell up" meaning no new data to be found here so don't bother. That explains why these types can't grasp the concept of you can't see where we're going if you don't know where we've been, and why rewriting the past to match whatever narrative they want to apply is such a big thing. That does make things seem more like they're searching for novelty over substance, a societal constant, yes, but putting way too much effort into defending why they have to keep up with the hottest trends.

  • Tony lopez

    His comments on responsibility are correct,but people do try to oppress others always ,the thing is to not allow that always fight for human rights, equal rights, so yes take responsibility,follow your dreams but also fight for fairness and social justice,then through hard fought effort you get a fair and equal society , never perfect but better

  • veronica

    Regarding the book you mentioned about South America, the terrible story, we walk among masked kidnappers, torturers and murderers, all free or most of them, and when they are brought to court and refuse to declare, then they are granted the privilege of "home prison", which in this country is fun!… Our current government has practically disintegrated the office that took care of the files of the disappeared and so far, from the 40.000 pages the US government handed to our President, we have had absolutely no news as to the people mentioned there. Trump gave those to the civil sector that promoted and supported the dictatorship, our president's family among them.
    Some of the murderers are not even masked. They have kept their jobs while the trials for crimes against humanity proceed against them, they are in activity where they used to work! There is little hope for justice in our country, and as you said in one of your lectures, I do not know how a corrupted country can possibly overcome corruption… If you get to have any information accidentally through people who served in the military forces those days, you do not dare to go and make a statement against them, as there is no legal protection for whoever testifies against them nor for their families.

  • Kheng Ung

    Amongst the many things I admire about Dr. Peterson is his fearlessness. When he's confronted with the b.s from the radical left, he's not afraid to take them on like a true warrior. He has grit. He's my hero!

  • Silver Strings

    New drinking game: Watch a Dr. Peterson talk, and take a shot every time he says Fundamental, Question, Marxism, Intellectual, Solzhenitsyn, Dostoevsky, Meaning, Lobster, and three every time he goes on a tangent that eventually comes back around to the point.

  • T Clark

    Pretty goddamned interesting that this is at the Msrines Memorial….SF is a bastion of liberalism, and must once again become so, rather than the current iteration of what passes as 'liberal'. The Bay Area at large is a very important hub in the Western world, and, as such, needs to regain its footing from ideological hub back to liberalism. Thank You Independent Institute…I'll be looking into this organization deeper.

  • Alehia klorian

    Why is it he seems very manipulative! White Men listen to him because some of his view speaks to white male anger. He baits white male anger im order to sell books. I dont know what planet hes from but there is white male tyranny. The idea that he thinks its false is ridiculous. He view make are telling people that their is no such thing as white male tryranny so you dont have to feel you did any thing wrong and its a myth. EVERYBODY else who not white and male are looking at each other like is he for real. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRfFfr-tYh0 yeah no such thing!

  • Alehia klorian

    His ideology on women and white male power .You have the opportunity to get the job…but you actually getting the job is subjective. He saying some job women can not do because of X Y Z. This is why hes on the hot plate. for example being a fire fighter she has the opportunity to apply but to get a job where you have to carry a hose and possibly carry people from a fire she should not get job or giving them the job can be tragic. THAT IS COMPLETE BULL!

  • Ryan Ross

    Lmao I love how he can never remember which hobbit is Frodo or Bilbo. He always questions himself everytime he mentions it. Ive seen like 10 lectures where he talks about it.

  • Valencia Spain

    Honestly would love to see you discuss major topics with Shaykh Hamza Yusuf, both of you are inspirational individuals that have helped me understand life.

  • I'm lockey, lockey, leave you pokey, pokey No Rice a Roni, that's the okey, dokey

    Jordan "word salad" Peterson. If someone saying mumbo jumbo is what it takes for you idiots to get your life together then you're clearly still a mess but a more organized one.

  • Ava Anderson-Kemper

    Around 20-25 minutes in…talking about the Hebrew having been derived from older languages. I was working on my daily translations of Hebrew and pondered if the word "Anokiy" (I), might have derived from Anke. I have no idea, but it was a thought.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *