Who Drafted The Indian Constitution? Sankrant Sanu |Why India Is Still A Colonial State #SrijanTalks
Articles,  Blog

Who Drafted The Indian Constitution? Sankrant Sanu |Why India Is Still A Colonial State #SrijanTalks


People might say no no this is not true, the
British India Act was there, but we have a new constitution that the code started in…
promulgated and we became a republic in 1950, after the Constitution was accepted and so
on so forth. So now we have to look at the history of this
constitution coming from. So if we look at it who is actually the framer
of the Constitution, Who? if you ask any child in India say who was who created the constitution? what is the answer — Ambedkar. Ambedkar was the chairman of the drafting
committee. But most of the work was actually done by
this one person, and this person’s name.., also again we don’t even know recently,
but his name is Sir Sir Benegal Narsing Rao. Now, he is actually the drafter of the Indian
constitution. What does that mean? That means that he is actually the one, that
he had been in the ICS. He had been an employee of the British government
for a long time and he was the one who actually prepared the entire draft document which was
the Constitution. All the drafting committee did was some comments
made, some changes suggestions. Then there was a constitutional assembly. But, he, I would say, is really the writer
of the Indian Constitution.He was later on honored also. So who is he? he is an ICS, is the use or word or the companion of the order of the Indian empire. He was knighted in 1938. Why is somebody knighted? Because of loyalty to the British crown and
then, of course, he became the constitutional adviser in 1946 and then in 1948 he prepared
the initial draft. In fact he is the one who traveled to different
countries including US and other countries to look at their constitutions and so on so
forth. So I would say that for all practical purposes
he is the drafter of the Indian Constitution and then of course other people gave their
inputs and so on so forth. What does he use? Again, the template. He is a long loyal servant of the British
Empire and the template mainly comes from the British india Act, which is what he used
as the code template, which is by the way the British India Act, is the biggest act
that the British Parliament has ever passed. Till that it is a 4,000 pages act, which pretty
much like the ones every single thing about India 1935. The British in the act of 1935… is the longest
act part passed by the British Parliament. Because there… if some master is going to
figure out how to manage the the servants, then a lot of regulation is not.., if you
compare with the US Constitution, US Constitution is a very small, very small tiny booklet. Because the the power of more or less is vested
in the people. Right you don’t need a big framework of
somebody telling you what to do, if if the people are considered moral and intelligent
enough to figure it out for themselves. Right? All you need is some guidelines. But when you are in a civilizing mission then
you need to specify everything as much as possible. So this Benegal Narsing Rao actually framed
it, and then there is another code that you might be familiar for with, who is saying,
I am quite prepared to say, I should be the first person to burn it out and do not want
it, it does not suit anybody. This is a quote about the Constitution by
another well-known figure. So of course I think to be fair, we have to
look at that in a little bit of a nuance, he’s talking about a particular, in a particular
context, is speaking about that and later. Also, but in any case, it is a… there’s
a few things to, also a member of the Constitution, is firstly the framer or the drafter of it
is Sir Benegal Rau. Secondly the constitute assembly itself is
not a body which is elected an independent India. Constitution assembly itself comes from an
election. That is happening pre British India in terms
of who were they represented, and then after partition they kind of sorted them out, and
say, he represented India, Ok. So the calls constituted an assembly itself
is a colonial institution coming from pre-partition India. The drafter is clearly taking on the colonial
act, but then we start with and of course the Constitution is never ratified by the
people of free India. Right. There is no referendum on the Constitution
that says, do you ratify? Do you the people of India agree that this
constitution shall happen? Again as I said it’s not by elected people
of the free India either, but we start with ‘we, the people of India’. Now how did we the people of India come in
this matter? It has nothing to do with the people of India. We should, in fact, say we either colonized
elite who have been here by subservient to the British Empire, now deem to put this structure
on the Indian people. I mean that would be a fair and honest preamble
to the Constitution. But that’s not now how it is. it’s actually a good question. There are
long different histories are there, in terms of ratification of the Constitution. For instance, I think, in Brazil there was
an entire referendum for that. In the United States it was ratified. See, one of the other things is very strange
thing happens in India, the Constituent Assembly actually makes the constitution and it also
ratified the Constitution. Right. It is like saying ‘homework diya hai kisi ko, jisne home work kiya hai usne grade bhi kardiya khud ko”.. So in the US what happens is that the the
the framers of the Constitution framed it, but then it had to be ratified by each of
the states. Right. So each of the states so they’re the the
framers and the people who are ratifying it was different that means there is some check
on the people who are framing it because somebody else is going to ratify it. You have to make sure it’s going to be acceptable
to those who are going to ratify it. Right. So this process never happens in India because those two entities are the same, the people who are doing.

56 Comments

  • maha bharat

    मोलान आंबेडकर की शरियासंविधान हटेगा यह तो तय है।
    एक तो भारत का इस्लामीकरण होने के बाद
    मोलान आंबेडकर की शरियासंविधान हटा कर
    जिहादी शरिया लागू कर देंगे।
    और भारत फिर से गुलाम बनेगा।
    लेकिन हिंदू शास्त्र और शस्त्रों के साथ
    हिंदू संविधान
    हिंदू राष्ट्र
    बनायेगा तो भारत में धर्म का बचना संभव है।
    बाकी आपकी मर्जी क्या चाहते हैं ?
    जिहादी कटमुल्ला या धर्म के अनुयायी।
    जय श्री राम।
    Hgitoekwnwbchvh sbaqnnakskfoho59492o1iuhshf dsbgusixuf g gngkdowoqnsbfjfir fndnsjwieirjr ggbjdiskw
    flgigotoehwnegitorownw
    fngkhototouiho93927eyteg.

  • Vijay Ghunowa

    Indian Constitution should be rectify In Modi government, जय हिंद भारत माता की जय वंदे मातरम आनंद काल तक l प्रणाम

  • Hindu History

    Indian National Congress is puppet of Breaking India forces and the real enemy of India…

    Destroy UPA totally..

    All Hindusthani must unite against them..

  • Muscline Presenting Transgender Lesbian Women

    Indian constitution is the worst constitution in all of the Liberal Democracy.All Fundamental rights have been Distorted in Indian Constitution compared to Other Countries.

  • MahaVakyas

    This is not entirely true – Alladi Krishnaswamy Iyer was the one who drafted the constitution of India.

  • Ramesh Vardhan

    SIR BENEGAL NARASING RAO WAS A G S B FROM MANGALORE, KARNATAKA. WHO WAS TRUSTED SERVANT OF THE BRITISH. WITH OUT ELECTIONS, THEY CHELAS & CHAMCHA OF THE BRITISH WERE MADE MINISTERS TO RUIN OUR COUNTRY. THE BRITISH V C, WAS MADE GOVERNOR GENERAL OF INDIA, THE HEAD OF STATE INSTEAD OF MAHATMA GANDHIGANDHIJI, ON 15 AUG 1947, GANDHIJI WAS SENT OUT OF DELHI TO WATCH BLOODSHED AT CALCUTTA HELPLESSLY. …… FROM VERY FIRST DAY OF TRANSFER OF POWER ( NOT INDEPENDENT DAY). THE PROBLEMS STARTED…….. THE HYDERABAD NIZAM, KASHMIR KING, INVASION BY PAKISTANI SOLDIERS IN DISGUISE……. MANY OTHER ANTI NATIONAL IDEAS WERE PROMOTED……… DUE TO SUCH POLICIES, EVEN TODAY 30 % of US HAS TO FACE PROBLEMS EVEN TODAY.

  • apka dost

    In manusmiriti atleast its saying ppl can chnge their varnas bby proving themselves not by any authority bt chnge their by themselves….
    Bt in new constitution i cant chnge my category…
    Its bullshit…
    Radicalising
    And collecting ppl under one umbrella for collective power and wht they are doing with this power all wrng things

  • Raja will

    From the Draft of the Indian constitution to
    Jallianwala Bagh massacre Slum dog millionaire the GORA has really taken the piss out of INDIA sooooooo much.

  • Sir 2k6

    Time to update the Indian constitution to bring it up to date, to make it for the Indian people and not from the colonized Indian people. Jai Hind
    🇮🇳👌🏼

  • ll विनी शर्मा ll

    Indians should consider getting into parliament more and more, armed with this knowledge. With this
    methodology? We can weed out the corrupt western modeled politicians and slowly install a true Indian values based government.

  • Bakula Thompson

    Just like c(G)azi nehru, momana(indira)ghandy khan, rajiv ghandy khan ,,,all gave Bharat Ratna awards to themselves<<<>>>> Samvidhan ka drafting, framing , ratification, Final dhaancha, usme sau se adhik so called reforms, jisme koi Janta ki raay nahin ,sub kucch mugalia gulam parivar ne kiyaa, phir, PM ke pud pur bhi Janta ki murzi ke viruddh, apni munmaani se hi chipka so chipka tha…..National Herald ka Patrakarita kissa ki wohi kahaani .. ise Democracy KAHENGE ..
    ya, hau-khau-hau-khaucracy ???= AAKRAANTA-cracy ???
    and this is only the beginning of the loot-kaand !!!

  • Balj Bhullar

    Sikhs refused to sign on indian constitute, they never did…and fuddu hindus did, and now crying like bitches..

  • Googlie Googlinkty

    TIME FOR AN ALL INCLUSIVE REFERENDUM – Shocking revelation……very tragic and unfortunate……just does not rhyme nor reflect the culture, tradition, ethos and mindset of the Indian Civilization……It's time to throw the current copy and paste malicious and viciously forced un-ratified Constitution! on us by Brown British Servants/Sepoys, out of the window. We the people want to create our own sacred RASHTRIYA CONSTITUTION. Jai Hind & thanks Sanuji

  • KABIR GHOSH

    Constitution framers tried to force the unjust alien, imperialistic concepts of liberty, equality, and fraternity down the throats of godfearing Indian People. They should have got it ratified accordingly with the varna hierarchy.

    Sadly they were extremely naive people, with shallow and dubious backgrounds unlike Mr. Sankrant Sanu and foolishly considered all Indian people's equal. Sankrant Sanu should go back in time in a vedic quantum time machine and teach them that some Indians are more equal than others, and the Constitution needs their ratification.

  • Venkatnarayanan T G

    Since NDA has the majority let it get the Constitution ratified and pass it for acceptance. In fact, I am of the firm belief that since the Constituent Assembly was not elected then it has been thrust upon the people of India. For the first few decades after independence, the then elders were still in the mode of servitude be it in administration, politics or in social set up and many people were ignorant of the various nuances of government functioming imcluding the Parliament etc. It is, therefore, absolutely necessary that either the existing Constitution is ratified or a new Constitution is framed with appropriate election procedure etc. for electing an elected body for framing it and subsequently getting it passed for implementation.

  • Sreelakshmi Chandramohan

    Sir Benegal Narasinga Rao, I.C.S. main person of Constitution who drafted.Dr.Ambedkar was chairman of drafting comitee.Thank you for the truth.Oh, what a truth.

  • inner smile

    Constitution of India is best constitution having full fundamental rights fundamental duties Directive principles every type of love and many other things it is the best constitution of the whole planet

  • Tanishq Mahajan

    Bharat never got independent, it was shift from one colony to the other and both the colony was solely based on divide and rule which finally took a hit in 2019 where people choose development over appeasement.

  • Asha Pandey

    Indian constitution was initially also the state matter. All the states had to give the constitution according to the state's need to the centre. And this is how 370 came into existence. Later, sardar Patel said we will have one single constitution which will be of state as well. There shall be no different constitution of the state and that of the centre

  • Pratap Mudbidri

    So why don't we ratify it by both houses of parliament
    I never heard such an argument and it is shocking that it has happened. Thank you for opening our eyes Sir

  • Pratap Mudbidri

    Another point – it was all good in 1935-40, we are now nearing 2020 so who has the authority to change it/crop it down in size and make it conducive to the present day Indians. I had read a bit about BN Rao but was not aware that he was a British bureaucrat and wrote it totally with a white flavour – shame to us….

  • Freedom fighter

    Yes, there was Jawaharlal Nehru also in the committee. Constitution was made favouring the British!
    The extracts from different constitutions were given to Babasaheb just to arrange! And Babasaheb had told that this constitution would never benefit the country. He had nothing to do with this😢

  • राजन्य राठौड़

    आडम्बरकर का आडम्बर इसाइओँ की कठपुतली ।।

  • Saaga R

    We don't deserve a constitution like US.
    Indians litter, drive reckless and wrong side, do whatever they want no matter educated or not.
    Many people on various posts or profession have no morals.
    Traders of vegetables and food will hold stock just to inflate the prices.
    And the list is endless.
    If this big Constitution is not able to mandate and make us a good society, how can US Constitution like help ?
    India would have been much better under British in this era I would say.

  • Dipak Basu

    British officers made the Constitution in 1934-35 as British India Act. It was revised later as the Constitution of India. Ambedkar was appointed by the British too.

  • Indian Knight

    Still we are loyal to the crown of thief , we are just slaves , yes we do not need framework definitely , inthe favour of colonial the pakistan ?

  • Shashank Tripathi

    read the constitution assemble debate and the way ambedkar tried to defend many provisions of the constitution, three-tier it doesn't seem that he wanted to burn it out then. otherwise why he accepted to become the law minister of India

  • Telef Fernandes

    I think whatever he wrote came under the guidance and supervision of Dr. Ambedkar.
    Your statement is misguiding.

  • Suraj Dip

    The constitution is biased towards the Hindu population of India. This is why the minorities are ruling over the majority. Hindus talk so much about their scriptures, their 5000 year old plus civilization ,their beyond approach heros in the scriptures,my question is how did they get it so wrong that they became slaves to two subsequent invaders. Second question is how Hindus with so much knowledge did not see what was coming to them. Third question is why they are still slumbering and only saying something when they are awake just to hear themselves talk .
    Hindus even today are drifters. They love to indulge in bureaucracy just to make themselves feel important . Hindus are a credulous bunch of people with wandering mind. This coming five years is the period for Modijis government to get all the critical matters resolved and chart out the path for next 60 years.Modiji should not take for granted the drifting Hindu minds.
    Time is favorable right now.

  • Anand Mohan

    What do you mean by People ratifying //??? Everyone got to read it before Voting //?? How many could have done that ever //??
    What wrong is there I write my Self Exam and correct it seeing the Answer Pages.That is the way of any fine student does. If You were born before 1947,then you are a Colonial Man ///???What nonsense you are talking//?We didn't make a Constitution and send it for Ratification to VICEROY like Manmohan singh made the BUDGET and presented to IMF & WORLD BANK before reading in Parliament . Don't disseminate false information behind some Historical fact as contraband goods.
    We talk English .That way we are COLONIAL SLAVES: Say that way. It is unfortunate India could not find a common National language and there is no hope finding also because English turned into WORLD LANGUAGE also the one integrating force of India by the COMPUTERS. you can't go abroad with your regional Language. And finally all freedom fighters in the fore are Barristers who learned about Human freedom from English only,but not from Native rulers. You better go to Psychiatrist.

  • Shkhar Advaith

    in a team the team leader gets the credit for his wisdom !! Dr. Ambedkar was Leader of drafting committee – at the peak time everyone gave up – at that time it was only alone Dr . Ambedkar Alone stood by and executed so we acccept him(DR. B. R AMBEDKAR AS father of " INDIAN CONSTITUTION "

  • CHANDU ADDANKI

    After the great publicity who will now believe today that Benegale Narasimha Rao is drafter of Constitution.

  • PRASHANT SURYAGAN

    But ,sir Benegal rao was the only constitutional adviser.drafting work is done by constitution body which was set up,chairmen had the right to which article added and which not and which article suited to Indians or not..I saw the constitutional making debates in Sanvidhan series

  • Seeker

    IT IS TIME FOR THE COUNTRY TO RECOGNIZE THE IRONICAL ORIGINS OF THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION AND SYSTEMATICALLY AMEND IT, SO THAT OUR FUTURE GENERATIONS ARE SAFE FROM THE RADICAL AND TREACHEROUS ELEMENTS OF THE NATION. WITHOUT SUCH TRANSFORMATION, THERE WILL BE NO PEACE IN THE COUNTRY, ONLY UNCONTROLLED TURMOIL.

  • Krishnamoorthyvaradarajan Varadarajan

    From your presentation, what is going on within the guidelines laided by the outdated consti'n
    and the comments by the responsible publc its very clear the constn fully favouring anti Hindus and depriving us of our basic rights…lakhs of crores worth of wealth is being looted by corrupt
    rulers and which goes unquestioned.. Current example is the thirumala balaji temple being looted by andhra Christians..I stopped offering there and tell my people not to do so. Jagan the new cm, a Christian in Hindu name
    cheating all as a Hindu, with a new conversion story and appointing administers in tirupati and taking out the wealth for Christian s welfare…a very big looting going on in andhra,, started by his.father rajasekara reddy (y reddy for christains? cheating)….so also in Tamil nadu……Hindus are unsafe….the constitn. with dual secular and minority…..nonsense gives way for this…job reservation for Muslims in telimgana…how in secular…… Any solution…..?

  • Arhant Patharde

    This man doesn't even know constituent assembly passed the Constitution and after acceptance elections happened .This man is trying to look naive

  • Raj Rajn

    Our ancestors were cheated and conned successfully as they had blind.faith on Mahatma. Today Indians are waking up and realizing everything.
    Mr. Sankrant seems like a really brilliant person who cares deeply for sanatana dharma.

  • Youth Ethics Club

    If this process happens in india that this constitution never be followed by any state there is one only manuscript could have been followed Because only that time the second most powerful people were hidutva people.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *